Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect and impact of colonialism
Effects Of Colonialism
Effects Of Colonialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect and impact of colonialism
No other colonial master had a more extensive empire than Britain. The country put a
spirited fight against other European nations in the scramble and partitioning of the rest of the
globe. British imperialism was felt in the west, south, and East. The country had one of the
best militaries for a long time, and this enables it to conquer many territories in the world.
The history of colonization dates back to early years, and Britain was at the lead in most
African and Asian countries. The situation, however, was short-lived in some countries. Most
American nations secure their independence in the late 17th and early 18th century (Kahler,
2014). The act marked the beginning of decolonization, and most countries fought the
colonial masters to
…show more content…
be Free states. The aftermaths of the Second World War two marked a significant point for African and most of Asian countries as they secured their independence. The massive development of new states had far-reaching effects on their colonial masters. Britain had an enormous empire, and as a result, it faced many impacts which directly affected its culture. Britain was culturally known as a superpower, but this changed with decolonization. The country boosted of the most significant and most influential military forces in the world after the Second World War (Kahler, 2014). It had collaborated with its allies in defeating the Nazi soldiers of German. With the down of decolonization, however, its army decreased in size as it composed of soldiers from its colonies. The achievement of independence by other countries meant that Britain had to rely on its native soldiers. It was a big challenge to the nation which had made itself a name due to the formidable military. The country’s global power slowly declined, and some of its former colonies military forces even became stronger than it. A good example is the rapid rise of the United States as the world’s superpower. The inception of decolonization eroded Britain culture of being a superpower. The British culture was based on its native people and was spread to its colonies, but decolonization reversed the whole process. Britain is a colonial power, conquered other empires and established its rule as well as incorporating its culture in the new territories. The cultural aspect of Britain is viewable in its colonies. For example, it introduced a dressing code that is still used in most of its former African colonies. The situation reversed in the mid-19th century when most African and Asian countries gained freedom. The new empires established their rules and rejuvenated the culture of its people. With globalization, spreading one’s way of life to other foreign land is possible (Hopkins, 2008). It has caused many people from different backgrounds to tour the U.K. the people move with their culture and spread it to the British. Many residents of Britain have been assimilated by foreign cultures as Free states foster their doctrines. When the British from foreign countries moved back to their homeland, they had diluted their culture. Decolonization is responsible for the diverse cultural aspects in Britain. Nearly all British were Christians, and some of the missionaries even originated from the land. Its imperialism role was coined with the spread of Christianity. The Christian religion categorized the British Empire. It undermined the existing beliefs in the new territories. When decolonization occurred, most of the Asian-Pacific and North Africa countries backslide to its religious beliefs (Creary, 2012). Britain had changed its original stand and wanted to continue with its relationship with the former colonies. In return, the independent states spread their religion to the U.K. Britain has opened its borders to most of the Commonwealth countries, and this has fostered massive inflow of foreigners with different religious backgrounds. Britain’s religious classes are more diversified in the decolonization era as compared to the pre and the colonization period. Britain culture was based on autocratic power. The Queen was responsible for all decisions made by the empire. The country also conquered and established its rule in other countries without their consent. Such culture dominated most colonies till the 18th and even 19th century. The superpowers would invade foreign countries and establish its rule. The expansion of empires was based on fighting, and the stronger side was the most substantial beneficiary. Things changed with decolonization and establishment of the United Nations (UN) which recognized independent nations (Buettner, 2016).
The country shifted from
dictatorial form of governance to a democratic one. Even though the queen still exists, the
state has a different approach to foreign lands as it was in the pre-colonial era. Today, Britain
has developed a diplomacy form of strategy. They only invade foreign lands with logical
reasons. The leadership culture in Britain has significantly been affected by the
decolonization.
The Britain culture was based on the native languages spoken in the country, but the
culture has changed due to new languages. English was the major language used in the
British Empire. The language was taught and used in all formal functions. Decolonization
reversed the whole process as the former colonies incorporated their languages to the official
state functions. One such effect result from the inception of the U.S English which has a
significant difference to the one used back in Britain. All these foreign languages have been
incorporated in the British societies. Unlike the past, most British today speak foreign
languages, particularly those in their former colonies. Decolonization has created different
states, each with its language, which has diffused into the U.K
culture. Food and clothing characterize a people’s culture. It corrupted the British culture during the colonial era and even had more significant effects in the decolonization period. Different foods and clothing are used in particular backgrounds. Britain conquered many nations and introduced its foods and dressing style to the local people. The act was short lived as independent states sprouted and the colonial masters’ hand to return to their motherland. The colonialists did not go home empty-handed but took some food and dressing styles with them. They introduced new plantations in the homeland. Britain being a superpower had many returnees who had carried some goodies to their parent nation. Today, the country is diversified as different vegetation and dressing are found in the country. Decolonization made colonial masters return to their home, and in so doing, they carried items that directly affected the culture of its people. The precolonial culture entailed animosity among countries in the world. Some empires established ties with the others that had common interests. War characterized the life of the people, and it reached its climax during the Second World War (Buettner, 2016). European nations were in a competition to conquer many countries and established its authorities. The countries fought to control resources in some countries, and the one with the powerful military always owned. The frosty relationship in the globe existed for a long time and only ended during the massive decolonization era of the mid-19th century. With independent states, no other country was willing to fight each other to have control of it. The war-oriented culture also changed as the colonial master established close ties with its former colonies. It is right to argue that decolonization played a significant role in transforming the war-dominated culture into a peace-focused culture in U.K. A discriminatory culture by race and origin was dominant in the pre-colonial and colonial Britain. Interestingly, the government played a lead role in creating divisions among the human race. The Jewish and other foreigners were unwelcomed in the country, and the situation only changed during the decolonization era. When Britain colonized Africa, it took some of its citizens to their homeland. At U.K, the blacks had no dignity and were discriminated in broad daylight. Had decolonization not been achieved, racism would still be at the pick point. The onset of independent states, made the British to understand that the other people had the same rights as theirs. The formulation of UN also advocated for the rights of the independent nations, and the result was a more unified society. The culture of all people across the globe is readily accepted in the U.K., thanks to the decolonization process. In conclusion, Even though colonization had several impacts on the British culture, the decolonization era had more drastic changes in the ways of life for the people of U.K. It is widely argued that colonization had a positive and negative effect to the colonies, but no substantive information is readily available on the impact of decolonization. The formation of independent states is an exciting occurrence not just to the new countries but the colonial masters. Its effects are visible at most of the imperialist’s base. Britain was at the forefront in partitioning and establishing its rule on new territories as compared to any other European country. Due to this fact, when decolonization came, the country’s culture was drastically affected. The effect of decolonization is not yet over, and it will not end any time soon. States are still freeing themselves from all external forces from their colonies, and as a result, more effects are on the way.
the two countries. But he saw the British Empire as a worldwide alliance of free
In 1419, Prince Henry the Navigator of Portugal began the period of time known as the “Age of Exploration”. Europe’s leading superpowers, France, Spain, Portugal, Holland, and England, all competed for colonization in unknown territories. Samuel de Champlain colonized along the St. Lawrence River in 1608, Henry Hudson of Holland established Albany in 1609, and Spain established colonies in Mexico and Mesoamerica. In 1607, England established its first colony in North America around the Chesapeake Bay, and nearly a decade later established a second colony in present-day New England. Both New England and the Chesapeake were founded by the British around the same time; however, both colonies developed a different economy, government, and many other ways of life.
They also needed land to acquire raw materials for growing markets. One country that had imperialism was India. By the mid-1880s, the British East India Company controlled three fifths of India. The cause of British domination was that the land was very diverse and the people could not unite and that the British either paid local princes or used weapons to get control. Positive effects of imperialistic rule in India were that the British set up a stronger economy and more powerful industries.
Imperialism is a policy of a country’s empire that extends its military power across other lands to get more contry of a area or region. England imperised the places that they did to ether get control over land. To get better access of trade, or just wanted to have more military power in the areas. The affected regions that England imperialized was intended to get access to more trade and to have a greater impact on the regions they were in.
Britain was committed to imperializing countries that benefitted them. Benjamin Disraeli, the British prime minister during the 1870’s, persuaded Great Britain to imperialize because it was a way to guard vital British markets overseas, resources, and jobs, as well as enhance their well known reputation as being the most powerful country (Butler). Great Britain wanted to spread its culture and religion (Butler). As a result, Christianity was dispersed imperialized countries under the name of Great Britain. Another major reason Great Britain imperialized in Africa was because other European countries that were participating in the “Scramble for Africa” (Berard). This was the time period where certain European countries fought over what countries in Africa to imperialize. Britain wanted more power, and therefore, more land as well. Therefore, they resorted to imperializing lands such as those in Africa.
Through expansion and imperialism, the west had begun to dominate the world. The British imperialism spread into American culture even after the Revolution. The painting “American Progress” by John Gast shows imperialism in America as the American’s began to expand west. The painting is also relevant to the expansion of Britain in the Eastern world. Both American imperialism and British imperialism did whatever it took right or wrong to expand and grow. The expansion was not only of land but also the spread of beliefs and religious views.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India, having previously been an group of independent and semi-independent princedoms and territories, underwent great change under British administration. Originally intended to consolidate their hold on India by establishing a population that spoke the same language as their rulers, the British decision in the 1830s to educate Indians in a Western fashion, with English as the language of instruction, was the beginning of a chain of events, including a rise in Indian nationalism, that led to Indian resentment of British imperialism and ultimately to the loss of British control over India.
defended its’ crown against British rule. This war had a great impact on the people of each country.
The belief of a nation running their own state is a right for most of us. However, this is only a new conviction. The right for one to sovereign their own nation has come due with hard work. Illicit imperialism has stricken humanity for numerous years. Due to the aspiration of power certain nations today do not self-govern their own state. But why would there be a desire for this power? Some of the main items include natural resources, increased assets, and military expansion. Ideally this is great if this is voluntary external rule, but when it’s no longer voluntary this is when the boundary has been crossed. This is why every nation should have control over their own state if they desire.
how the English language has changed in the many years from then until now. The
The British Empire was the largest empire in history and for a time was the foremost global power. It was a product of the European age of discovery, which began with the maritime explorations of the 15th century, that sparked the era of the European colonial empires.
English has assumed the status of ‘neutral lingua franca’ (Hyland: 2006: 24) for its pervasive use in both Anglophonic and international contexts to the extent that approximately “one in five of the world’s population now speaks English with reasonable competence” (Crystal, 2003). Canagarajah (2006) reports two different distributions of speakers for year 2050 as follows:
with this political change and worldwide multiculturalism, people stared to view dialects from a new perspective.
...al systems, together with morphology, syntax and vocabulary. It is recognized that multilingualists have got to learn in what ways grammatical, phonemic, and semantic policies can be generalized across two or more languages and, if this is not possible, they must go for awareness of any methodical structural dissimilarities. This is particularly pertinent when two languages do not contribute to the similar syntactical rules. On the other hand, it is necessary to keep in mind that the process of flattering literacy cannot be alienated from the social background. Language is eventually a means of expression and individuality. References David Crystal (1997) English as a Global Language, Cambridge University Press. Graddol, David. The future of English? A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. London British Council (1997)
Old English, and thus the English language as a whole, was first spoken in the fifth century AD in Britain. At the time, Britain was a former province of the Roman Empire, and most of its inhabitants spoke a Celtic language (Brief History). Around the year 500 AD, three Germanic tribes invaded Britain by crossing the North Sea from what is now Denmark and