Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle friendship types
Nicomachean ethics friendship
Aristotle friendship types
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Generally speaking Aristotle first describes friendship with the Greek word philia which is a broader definition than just friendship. Philia includes all kind of friendship that can exist, families, the political community, neighbours and children.
Aristotle pointed out that friendship is a thing most important in nowadays life, since without friends no one can survive. Friendship to be a necessity to live. Also he argued that friendship is a key to human happiness ,that our friends can inspire on us positively ,share their experience and help us when we need them. The most important fact for Aristotle is to have a real friendship , people have to spend lots of time together, became very close to each other.
For Aristotle there are three main qualities that defines if someone qualifies as a friend: Those types called Nicomachean Ethics and focuses on the three kinds of friendship one can have.The are pleasantness - Friendship between the young is thought to be grounded on pleasure, because the lives of the young are regulated by their feelings, and their chief interest is in their own pleasure and the opportunity of the moment. , excel-lence - Only the friendship of those who are good, and are similar in their goodness, is perfect. and usefulness . As from him point of view friends in this theory love each other for their usefulness “ not in his own right, but insofar as they gain some good for themselves from him” (Aristotle, 121 ) .
He is highliting some types as advantages,admiration and pleasure.However you must not chooce your friends, because he can pay for the expensive drinks or he has lots of usefull connection or just simply can bee helpfull for you at any time of the day.We are friends not as long as one of us are v...
... middle of paper ...
...ore and more depending on the technology and certainly there a lot of advantages which we can get from it .Moreover, in the context of globalization, friendship is irrespective of religion, creed, colour, language, and geographical boundaries. With the emergence of various social networks, technology has made it possible that a person from one part of the world can befriend another individual from totally different background and social upbringing .
The most satisfactory conclusion , that I can come to is that for Aristotle traditional virtual friendship of the is simply and psychologically impossible, as it is not involved real life interaction and communication face to face by two partners.
From my point of view nowadays we are living in a free world and everybody has his rights and alternative choices , which mean he or she can choose his perfect friendship.
The article “Faux friendship”, written by William Deresiewicz, explains the influence social media has had on the structure of friendship over the years. In the article states, that in this day in age friendships are so common and under looked that we are essentially friends with everyone. Deresiewicz believes that, with the introduction of social media sites such as, face book, my space, and twitter, people seem to value the number of “friends” they have rather than the quality of their few intimate friendships. Deresiewicz explains that, in ancient times friendships were drastically different. He applauds friendships like that of Achilles and Patrodus, David and Jonathan, Virgil Nisus and Euryalus stating that they were unordinary, but universal,
One of the things Aristotle discusses is the need to limit the number of friends we have. He states: “So the right course is perhaps not to seek to
Aristotle uses a rather categorical approach to friendship. By making strict delineations and then using examples, he establishes a rather strict definition of friendship that is created along lines of social class. He argues, among other things, that friendship must be between similarly virtuous men of equal standing. In addition, the purest form of friendship, and the one that Aristotle considers the only genuine friendship, involves that of two men and that is free from outside reciprocation.
Late one evening, curled up in her nest, Harriet lay thoughtfully reading the last of Aristotle’s model of friendships: the perfect friendship. Though no secret to Harriet, Aristotle presents the idea that it is the most desirable and genuine of the three forms. The foundation of this friendship is not trivial, but instead the relationship is built on a common good and virtuous nature. As Aristotle explains, “those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves, and those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves.” Aristotle continues, “Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for those wish well alike to each other qua good, and they are good in themselves.” (concluding sentence or two...)
Friendship is undoubtedly one of the most important elements in the books of Aristotle’s ethical principles. Aristotle takes the idea of friendship to a serious degree. He categorizes them into three groups or types of friendships. This report will attempt to define each type of friendship as well as identify the role of friendship in a society.
In the writings of Aristotle, seen in Nicomachean Ethics, it is evident that Aristotle believes that friendship is necessary for a virtuous and therefore happy life. I believe that this is accurate due to the similar conditions necessary for a complete friendship and a happy life. It is also evident that friendship is useful in achieving a happy life because friendship can make performing virtuous actions easier. His interpretation can be misunderstood and mistakes in practice can be made, so we will need to discuss these follies as well, in order to understand all the effects of friendship on achieving a happy life.
First, the article introduces the audience to friendships described by Aristotle, and Todd May. In the text it states, “It is threatened when we are encouraged to look up on those
Philosophers have discuss and debate about friendship and the true meaning to be a friend to others Aristotle have given requirements as well as qualities a friend possession within different types of friendships. He debates that a good man does not need friends but the points he brings up proves that a good man can not live a pleasant life in solitary.
Aristotle argues that friendship is a vital part of life. It serves not only as a means to bond individuals together, but also a necessity in achieving overall happiness. Aristotle comments on the various types of friendships that exist, and the role they each play in society. He explains three overarching types; utility, pleasure, and complete friendship. Yet, with family, friendship is different than it is with companionship. As Aristotle states in his piece, Nicomachean Ethics on friendship in families, “they all seem to depend on paternal friendship” (Aristotle, 1161b18). In The Aeneid, Aeneas and Anchises’ relationship, perfectly embodies this. The father son bond does not distinctly resemble one of the three types, rather it is a friendship in of itself; a paternal friendship.
Aristotle regards Virtue Friendship as perfect. He does not comment on the potential negatives, whereas Lewis more realistically presents possible dangers of his highest form of friendship. Lewis believes that the birth of friendship proper from companionship reveals friendship’s dark and idolatrous side. Lewis comments on the sense of inclusiveness between friends that can create an “us/them” tension that can be potentially dangerous. He believes there is danger in the sense that a partial indifference or deafness to the voices of the outside world may develop and morph into dangerous perversions of
So if you look at Aristotle’s ideas of what friendship is in the simplest way possible, I agree with him. But if you think about it in a more intricate way, observing every detail, I don’t think friendship can be broken down into three groups. Aristotle has some interesting points regarding each type of friendship, but when it’s viewed collectively, considering the many elements along with it, I don’t think his three categories cover all the potential ideas about friendships.
Friendships are based on a completely different set of structural relationships to those with parents. They are more symmetrical and involve sharing and exchange. Friendships are important to young children but there is a change at the beginning of adolescence -- a move to intimacy that includes the development of a more exclusive focus, a willingness to talk about oneself and to share problems and advice. Friends tell one another just about everything that is going on in each other's lives... Friends literally reason together in order to organise experience and to define themselves as persons.
Friendship is a relationship that all the individuals can create by themselves. Though it is not a god gifted relationship like that of the relationship of a mother, father, sister, brother or any of the other family but still it is one of the best relations an individual can possess. People who have true friends consider themselves as the luckiest individuals on earth.
What is a friend? If someone were to ask this question, it would get many contending answers. Some may say a friend is someone who has common interests, others may say it’s someone who is incredibly generous and enjoyable. These are two different types of friends, but are they true friends? How does one know if a friend is real or false. As Aristotle explains in Book 8 of Nicomachean Ethics, there are many forms of friendship, yet only one is true. A true friendship is one not only of mutual giving or common interest, but of mutual benefit. A true friend is someone who helps bring one closer to the God within them, bettering them as a person.
Aristotle claimed that true, virtuous friends spend time together to grow accustomed to each other. They are similar in their beliefs, and it was rare to find such good friends. Now that technology has evolved with the internet and social media, it has been very easy to look up people whom you might share similar values and thoughts to get together or create a group on social media to discuss. I believe that Aristotle would have agreed that social media narrowed the search for people who might end up becoming your true friends.