Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How has social media changed relationships
How has social media changed relationships
How has social media changed relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How has social media changed relationships
Friendship and love are important relationships that everyone needs in their lives. Many great philosophers wrote about both friendship and love, and most of them classified the relationships as means to a happy life. Aristotle describes in his book, Nicomachean Ethics, the good and virtuous way to live a successful and happy life in this world. In these modern periods, technology, more specifically social media, has prevailed explicitly in a short time. It has paradoxically affected modern relationships. It increased opportunities for communication and connections, but still decreased the value and meaningfulness attributed to some kinds of relationships.
Aristotle claimed that true, virtuous friends spend time together to grow accustomed to each other. They are similar in their beliefs, and it was rare to find such good friends. Now that technology has evolved with the internet and social media, it has been very easy to look up people whom you might share similar values and thoughts to get together or create a group on social media to discuss. I believe that Aristotle would have agreed that social media narrowed the search for people who might end up becoming your true friends.
…show more content…
one can have over three hundred friends on facebook, but it does not mean that they are really your friends. Aristotle believed in a few amount of true friends. If he was on facebook, he would have less than ten friends. This is mostly true in that no one texts all their friends on facebook. Everyone has a set number of people they text frequently and whom they would call their real friends. As we get deeper into the online friendship we also mistake the level of intimacy involved there. We may be texting each other everyday and later believe we became best friends which may not be the case on the other person. Therefore, most of the time online friendship creates superficial
The article “Faux friendship”, written by William Deresiewicz, explains the influence social media has had on the structure of friendship over the years. In the article states, that in this day in age friendships are so common and under looked that we are essentially friends with everyone. Deresiewicz believes that, with the introduction of social media sites such as, face book, my space, and twitter, people seem to value the number of “friends” they have rather than the quality of their few intimate friendships. Deresiewicz explains that, in ancient times friendships were drastically different. He applauds friendships like that of Achilles and Patrodus, David and Jonathan, Virgil Nisus and Euryalus stating that they were unordinary, but universal,
Have you ever made any friends via Facebook, Twitter, or Snapchat that you have never met before? I know I have through Twitter due to having the same interests. Some may say those friends are not really your friends, but virtual ones instead. In the article, “The Limits of Friendships,” by Maria Konnikova, she talks about friendships that are made virtually and in reality. The author argues that the use of social media has hindered friendships and face to face connections within one’s social circle, however, she does not address that they have met their closest support group through social media. Face to face connections help identify who one’s true friends are and they are more realistically made when it is in person rather than over social media, but there Konnikova fails to address the fact that social media has allowed many to connect
To be a friend has almost certainly become a role of infinite definition. Agreeing with author Joyce Xinran, after reading her article, “Friending: The Changing Definition of Friendship in the Social Media Era,” the modern idea of a friend has changed in its meaning of intimacy. People have considered no boundaries when allowing one the position of associate. The act of being mildly pleasant will promote even a stranger to the status of friend. To solve this issue people must realize that receiving a simple electronic request to be a friend is hardly mastering the technique of camaraderie.
Aristotle considers friendship to be a necessity to live. He claims that no individual would chose to live without friends even if the individual had all of the other good things in life. He also describes friendship as a virtue and as just. Given the above statements on friendship, it is safe to say that Aristotle felt that friendship is something that every human must have in order to reach a peaceful state of mind. It has all of the qualities of good as long as both parties of a friendship are considered good. Therefore, the role of friendship in a society is to promote goodness between all parties involved in it.
Alex Pattakos used Aristotle to explain the value of friendships several times in his article, “The Meaning of Friendship in a Social-Networked World”. Aristotle said that friendship was like “a single soul living in two bodies” (210); a thought that contrasted quite a bit from the movie The Social Network. Pattakos used the popular movie to assess the effect of social media in friendships. He described our lives as now having five-hundred friends, meaning more of a quantity than good quality friendships. Pattakos believes that as a society we have drifted away from friendships and the sense of community. He also believes that we would rather talk to random strangers because as a society we have lost the will to work towards close friendships.
Naturally, human beings are social beings and cannot live without friends. Friendship is an essential part of the structure of human existence. Today’s people are seeking and participating in relationships because they believe that it is good to have friends so as to experience pleasure, to be honored, to be healthy, and to prosper in life. Even in the inferior kind of friendships, people cooperate for the common advantage or pleasure. Irrespective of qualifications, career, personal perspectives, cultural differences, and interests, all people seek for love and acknowledgement from others (Curzer, 2012). This means that at a particular time, every individual will seek for a friendship, whether based on utility, pleasure, or even virtuous
In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle describes both justice and friendship as an intertwining bond that hold together a society. Subsequently, Aristotle makes reference to three (3) kinds of friendship. The first is friendship based on utility, where both people derive some benefit from each other; a lowest form of friendship. During this stage, the friendship is still at its lowest form, shallow and or “easily dissolved”. This so-called friendship is in its exploratory phase, as each person is still discovering and learning about the other person’s personality, perhaps likes and dislikes and how one fits in the other’s needs. During this phase, the friendship is also fragile or easily broken; it’s perhaps in the inception phase. Additionally,
Adam Briggle also talks about how on online friendships in his article Real friends: how the internet can foster friendship. He states that we can sell our best quality and hide or not show the weaker side of ourselves, whereas in face-face friendships we may not be able to hide those negative traits about ourselves and they may just come out without our knowledge. This being said gives us or the internet user full control on how and what they what to share with other individuals online. (Briggle, 2008, p.
‘’friend’’ mean? The person who keeps you grounded, the eyes needed when you can't see
...to Facebook, as well as to many other social media that is found on the web. Social communication online can never replace the true face-to-face communication, and many people justify it.
People have the right of freedom to post and type what they want to express in the group without any interfere. Thus, even they are quite and isolated in the reality, they still are able to find friends easily online, because they do not need to see each other and just have the online interactions, such as textually conversations, etc. As long as they find someone who could talk to, then they could become friends easily. In this case, I am able to connect it to the reading by Tufecki, who is the author of the reading of “Who Acquired Friends Through Social Media and Why?”. “Seek and ye shall find” is the major theme of this reading. The author concluded that people believe in online friendship are higher chance to acquire new friends online, compared to those who do not trust online friendships. In his reading, people who believe in online friendship had 52% higher odds of acquiring new friends. There are some different reasons for those who support the idea of make new friends online. Most of the people support the belief in “hyperpersonal” nature of
"We believe that more relationships provide more opportunity." (Source 2). It has gotten into the minds of avid Internet users that the more people you have retweeting you, liking your pictures, or your status, the more social you become. How many of these followers are actually their friends? The more notifications you have on social media does not equal the amount of friends you have. It does not make you social, it just makes you another active user on social media. Receiving notifications does not help you make friends. Even just having a little chat with people online does not mean you are friends. More relationships with people online do not provide any opportunity of creating any real friendships. Friendship are not created by liking someone's status or retweeting someone's picture. ". . . online Americans tend to have 644 ties on average." (Source 1). There is more focus on making connections, than making real friends. A casual conversation does not automatically create a real friendship. Online you can create a larger group of connections, but this does not make you social. The social ties that the internet offers do not create a real bond between people. Social media connections do not help you create a real relationship with another person. More social ties do not mean you are interacting with more people, it just means you have connections with a larger group. I don’t agree with the belief that
Online friends are not really too different from real friends. For some people, friendship is all about affiliation, intimacy, or close relationships. It is
A friend is someone difficult to find. A friend is someone you can always count on when times are tough. The dictionary's definition of a good friend is a person attached to another by feelings of affection or personal regard. A good friend is there when you are struggling. For example, when a boy breaks your heart a good friend walks you through it and offers a shoulder to cry on. According to Bree Neff, a good friend is someone who is trustworthy, doesn't talk behind your back, listens to your problems, gives good advice and tries to lend humor along with his or her support. There are also bad friends, those who pretend to care and then turn around gossiping and starting drama. Good and bad friends are all around you, involved in your everyday life. To find good friends you should look for such traits as being kind, trustworthy, loyal and dependable.
“In order to maintain a positive on-going relationship in any difficult face-to-face circumstance, an individual must learn the appropriate socialization rituals. Knowing these rituals and being able to play a proper front stage role is crucial in order for an individual to get along with others (Brignall and Valey, 2005).” With the relatively recent rise of social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, the means for maintaining relationships through these platforms rather than speech communication and face-to-face communication are becoming much more apparent and widespread throughout society. However, it is difficult to maintain these relationships without knowing proper social skills especially if these skills are not practiced or introduced to an individual. Although, “Communication frequency and self-disclosure play a role in computer-mediated communication and the formation of online friendships just as they do in face-to-face interactions and offline friendships (Subrahmanyam and Greenfield, 2008).” Yet, in our vast digital world that we reside in today, the ways in which we choose to communicate are becoming hindered by our participation in online communication. “We must have a philosophical understanding of the purpose and importance of communication to individuals and based upon this understanding, shape our attitude and value toward the communication process (McFarlane, 2010).” It is extremely crucial to understand communication’s importance and to not tuck the original beliefs and values regarding the tool underneath the rug, resorting and succumbing to communicating poorly in a fashion that mimics what we have now experienced via our devices. “As with any social change, we also believe there is a need to study and understand the impacts that change might have, regardless of whether such changes are viewed as positive or