Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Market structure: business economics
Demerits of perfect competition market
Market structure: business economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Market structure: business economics
a.) Perfect competition is used to benchmark allocative efficiency in market structure. It can be considered as unrealistic but still, characteristics of perfect competition guarantees efficiency. To demonstrate perfection is in fact the main purpose of perfect competition, it helps to evaluate the physical world market structure that certainly fall short of this perfection and illustrate the best of all possible resource allocation worlds. With perfect competition efficiency is achieved because the price is equal to marginal cost. The value of goods produced is indicated by price and thus production generates satisfaction. Opportunity cost of unproduced goods is indicated by marginal cost and therefore resulting lost satisfaction from forgone production. Overall satisfaction cannot be added by decreasing of increasing production because the price (satisfaction obtained) is equal to marginal cost (satisfaction forgone). If there is no equality between price and marginal cost then we can increase satisfaction by changing production. Allocative Efficiency: When the quantity of output produced achieves the greatest level of total welfare possible. When MB=MC. When P=MC. B.) Monopolistically competitive firms fail to achieve allocative efficiency because price is greater than Marginal cost. One of the reasons of its inefficiency is also because it charges greater prices and produces lower output as compared to perfect competition. As can be seen from the graph all firms wishes to make maximum profit. Allocative efficiency is the best point, where Marginal cost equals to marginal revenue (Q3). All firm will like to have maximum profits where marginal cost while equals to marginal revenue (Q1). ... ... middle of paper ... ...ortionate change in demand divided by the proportionate change in income) Elastic because the value is greater than 1. Complementary good because the demand for the good decreases as the price of the other good increases. Answer 9 (a) the firm will produce 70 units in order to maximise profits at a price of $8 per unit. (b) The firms avaerage cost of production will be $6 at the output. (c) The firm will make $2*70 = $140 profit. (d) The will produce 50 units in order to maximise its profit at a price of $5 per unit. (e) It will make $0 profit. (f) The firm will produce 40 units in order to maximise profits at a price of $ 4 per unit. (g) Firm will be at loss of $1.50*40=$60. (h) The firm will shut down below the price of $ 3.50 (where P=AVC). (i) The will shut down below the price of $ 5 (where P=AC) in the long run.
There are two solutions that provide the optimal profit given the current constraints under which JP Molasses operates. Under these conditions, the optimal profit is $63,571. This profit margin is achieved in both cases with revenue of $942,354 and cost of $412,333 for material purchased and $466,450 for fixed and variable costs in processing, for total cost of $878,783.
For the month of December, our expected demand is 377 units of Double Team (Fries and Nuggets with Drinks). 377 orders would need 28,297.08grams of fries and 18,864.72grams of nuggets; in cooking this, it will consume 12,563.90ml of oil; to make the juice, 4,716.18grams of powdered juice and 6,036.71ounces of water is needed; and 377 cups and 377 straws because 1 unit of Double Team needs 125g of Fries, 50g of Nuggets, 33.3ml of Oil, 12.5g of juice powder, and 16oz of water, 1 straw and 1 cup. In order to meet this demand for the month of September, we must be able to sell at least 16 orders of Double Team per
A couple of Squares has a limited capacity for which to produce their products and smaller companies tend to have larger fixed costs than bigger companies. Therefore, A Couple of Squares must maximize profits in order to ensure that they will stay in business. A profit-oriented pricing objective is also useful because of A Couple of Squares’ increased sales goals. A Couple of Squares increased their sales goals due to recent financial troubles. Maximizing profits is the easiest way to meet these sales goals due to the fact that A Couple of Squares has limited production capacity. The last key consideration favors a profit-oriented pricing objective because A Couple of Squares offers a specialty product. A specialty product often has limited competition, therefore can be priced on customer value. Pricing at customer value will maximize profits as well as customer satisfaction. A Couple of Squares’ lack of production capacity, increased sales goals, and specialty product favor a profit-oriented pricing
Lululemon’s has to produce and sell 150,000 jackets in order to cover their total expenses, fixed and variable. At this level of sales, Lululemon’s will breakeven (profit = loss).
Efficiency is concerned with the optimal production and allocation of resources given existing factors of production while equity is concerned with how resources are distributed throughout society (Pettinger, 2010). The equity-efficiency trade-off is an economic situation in which there is a perceived tradeoff between the equity and efficiency of a given economy. This tradeoff is commonly viewed within the context of the production possibility frontier, where any additional gains in production efficiency must be offset by a reduction in the economy 's equity. Within this equity and efficiency tradeoff, equity refers to the economy 's financial capital, while efficiency refers to the future efficiency in the production of goods and services. This theory asserts that, in order for a nation to
If the company follow this recommendations, it will obtain a profit of $ 531,000 that represents $180,000 more than with seasonal production
A perfectly competitive market is based on a model of perfect competition. For a market to fall under this model it must have a number of firms, homogeneous products, and easy exit and entry levels into the market (McTaggart, 1992).
Social efficiency is related to the concept of the government intervening in a situation where the costs pertaining to a firm or a number of firms acting in a specific way is higher that its benefits. One might want to say for correctness purposes that one achieves social efficiency when "the marginal benefits to society - or marginal social benefits (MSB) of producing any given good or service exceed the marginal costs to society or marginal social costs (MSC)." [2]
We know that it was going to be expensive to produce the product but we are confident that no matter the cost of production, our sales would greatly succeed the cost. The cost of producing a 5 oz. can was about 75 to 80 cents if they can produce 100,000 per month. If we were to produce 50,000 cans per month, that cost would rise by 5 to 10 cents per can. A 10 oz. can would cost about 25% more than a 5 oz. can would to produce. With those numbers, 100,000 5 oz. cans would cost us about $900,000-$960,000 per year to produce. 50,000 5 oz. cans would cost us $750,000. 100,000 10 oz. cans would cost us $1.125M-$1.2M a year...
A fraction-of-a-cent cost change can represent a large dollar change in overall profitability, when selling millions of units of product a month. Managers must carefully watch per unit costs on a daily basis through the production process, while at the same time dealing with materials and output in huge quantities” (From Academic
I chose a potential selling price of $24.99 and got a cost per unit of $2 from a manufacturer on Alibaba. I added all the other approximate costs associated with selling the product into the spreadsheet
The concept of perfect market allocation of resources was in W. Baumol's (1988,631), view largly theroretical. Baumol believed that economic models relied upon the concept of the invisible hand first discussed by Adam Smith. In these models, the perfectly competetive economy was able to allocate resources efficiently, without the need for market intervention by outside agents, including governments. However, there were significant weaknesses in these models particuarly in the area of ensuring equity of acess, social objectives and in the provision of public goods.
Perfect and monopolistic competition markets both share elasticity of demand in the long run. In both markets the consumer is aware of the price, if the price was to increase the demand for the product would decrease resulting in suppliers being unable to make a profit in the long run. Lastly, both markets are composed of firms seeking to maximise their profits. Profit maximization occurs when a firm produces goods to a high level so that the marginal cost of the production equates its marginal
“If firms operating under perfect competition want to optimize their input level by selecting the input quantities...
Efficiency is highly prized in a culture turned toward productivity. It is therefore cultivated in contemporary business administration theories. It also tends to be prized above all other values in modern society, as society is more and more oriented toward technological advancement. Efficiency is also defined here as the most economic or the shortest or fastest or most simple way of realizing or achieving a goal with the least cost.