Many scholars today argue that Abraham Lincoln held discriminatory beliefs towards slaves during his political career. In order to understand whether Abraham Lincoln was a racist, we must first define racism and understand how it propelled during the Civil War, a time of chaos between the South and the North over slavery issues. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines racism as “a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race” (merriam-webster.com). In fact, one could argue that the South held views of racial superiority over blacks. However, Lincoln did not assimilate such beliefs. He instead expressed strong support for the Emancipation Proclamation, advocated human rights to be equal with African Americans, and believed slavery was immoral and destructive.
The signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 led to public anger and mistrust especially for slave-owners in the South. The Emancipation Proclamation declared, “that all persons held as slaves” within the rebellious states “are, and henceforward shall be free” (archives.gov). Lincoln intended to pave the way for African Americans freedom by abolishing slavery in the United States. Lincoln’s support to end slavery reflected the opposite of a racist individual; he believed that
…show more content…
color was not a determinant factor to be a slave. The effect of the Emancipation Proclamation certainly would restore African American families, and potentially lead to African American rights down the road. Furthermore, Lincoln was not an abolitionist like Jerry Brown neither engaged nor endorsed abolitionist activities to end slavery, but he expressed it with words during his political career. For example, during the series of seven public debates in Ottawa, Lincoln replies to Douglass “I hold that he is as much entitle to these as the White man. But in the right to eat the bread . . . which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of every living man” (Document B). Lincoln expressed that all human beings who eat bread as white Americans are granted the right of life. His religious approach to his reply indicates again his support for human rights to be equal with African Americans. He never stated any discriminatory statements towards African Americans, supporting he is not a racist. Some may argue that Lincoln’s acknowledgement for the differentiated “physical differences” between blacks and whites can be perceived as a racial act. However, I believe it is important to understand differences between two opposing forces in order to carry out solutions and establish accordance between two parties, a principle that Lincoln held strong. Delivering slaves free is perceived as an act of freedom and the gift of human rights. Lincoln’s personal letter reads, “They were being separated forever from the scenes of their childhood, their friends, their fathers and mothers, and brothers and sisters . . . and children” (Document C). In this letter we witness Lincoln’s emotions towards the separation of African American families as he appeals to pathos in his letter. He vaguely argues that slavery is immoral and destructive since entire families are separated never to reconcile again. How could someone considerate of family and the human right to liberty be perceived as a racist? Although, to the eyes of a politician, Lincoln was probably only staying loyal to his Republican party by signing the Emancipation Proclamation, but through his personal letter we experience a sense for human kindness. During the Civil War era religion, legal, social and political factors played a role in demonizing the life of African Americans as slaves and portraying them un-superior to white Americans.
As we have discussed, Abraham Lincoln should not be perceive as a racist because he was a strong advocator for human rights which was witnessed through his signing of the Emancipation and orally addressing consideration for slaves. Evidence also supported his beliefs of slavery as immoral and destructive. If Lincoln would have not carried out these beliefs, how would the United States express peace and humanity rights worldwide
today?
Abraham Lincoln is known as the President who helped to free the slaves, lead the Union to victory over the confederates in the American Civil War, preserve the union of the United States and modernize the economy. The Emancipation Proclamation, issued through Presidential constitutional authority on January 1st, 1863, declared that all slaves in the ten remaining slave states were to be liberated and remain liberated. The Emancipation Proclamation freed between three and four million slaves, however, since it was a Presidential constitutional authority and not though congress, the Emancipation Proclamation failed to free slaves in Border States like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri. Essentially, states that were under Federal Government and loyal to the Union did not have their slaves liberated; Lincoln even stating “When it took effect in January 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed 3.1 million of the nation's 4 million slaves.” Some argue Lincoln issued this Proclamation in an attempt to satisfy the demands of Radical Republicans, members of a group within the Republican Party. Radical Republicans were a group of politicians who strongly...
Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.
Abraham Lincoln's position on slavery was the belief that the expansion of it to Free states and new territories should be ceased and that it eventually be abolished completely throughout the country. He believed simply that slavery was morally wrong, along with socially and politically wrong in the eyes of a Republican. Lincoln felt that this was a very important issue during the time period because there was starting to be much controversy between the Republicans and the Democrats regarding this issue. There was also a separation between the north and the south in the union, the north harboring the Free states and the south harboring the slave states. Lincoln refers many times to the Constitution and its relations to slavery. He was convinced that when our founding fathers wrote the Constitution their intentions were to be quite vague surrounding the topic of slavery and African-Americans, for the reason that he believes was because the fathers intended for slavery to come to an end in the distant future, in which Lincoln refers to the "ultimate extinction" of slavery. He also states that the men who wrote the constitution were wiser men, but obviously did not have the experience or technological advances that the men of his day did, hence the reasons of the measures taken by our founding fathers.
The drive to end slavery in the United States was a long one, from being debated in the writing of the Declaration of Independence, to exposure of its ills in literature, from rebellions of slaves, to the efforts of people like Harriet Tubman to transport escaping slaves along the Underground Railroad. Abolitionists had urged President Abraham Lincoln to free the slaves in the Confederate states from the very outset of the Civil War. By mid-1862, Lincoln had become increasingly convinced of the moral imperative to end slavery, but he hesitated (History.com). As commander-in-chief of the Union Army, he had military objectives to consider (History.com). On one hand, emancipation might
Reading Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address, one wouldn’t think he would be the president to end slavery.Speaking on outlawing slavery, he says,“I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” At the time, Lincoln wasn’t worried about slavery,
Lincoln declared that “all persons held as slaves” in areas in rebellion “shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” Not only liberate slaves in the border slave states, but the President has purposely made the proclamation in all places in the South where the slaves were existed. While the Emancipation Proclamation was an important turning point in the war. It transformed the fight to preserve the nation into a battle for human freedom. According the history book “A People and a Nation”, the Emancipation Proclamation was legally an ambiguous document, but as a moral and political document it had great meaning. It was a delicate balancing act because it defined the war as a war against slavery, not the war from northern and southern people, and at the same time, it protected Lincoln’s position with conservatives, and there was no turning
Lincoln is looked at by most of the Negro race as a hero, a man of great stature. They have been fooled by history that he loved the Negro, which in fact he did not. He has been quoted many times of talking down about the Negro and talking about how there will never be an equal society between the white man and the black race. In many Lincoln-Douglas debates he talked of this.
Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 during the civil war, as main goal to win the war. Some historians argued that it was based on feelings towards slaves because not only it freed slaves in the South; it was also a huge step for the real abolition of slavery in the United States. While other historians argued that it was a military tactic because it strengthened the Union army, because the emancipated slaves were joining the Union thus providing a larger manpower than the Confederacy . The Emancipation Proclamation emancipated slaves only in the Confederacy and did not apply to the Border-states and the Union states.
During the Abraham Lincoln’s short time as president, he managed not only to save a nation deeply divided and at war with itself, but to solidify the United States of America as a nation dedicated to the progress of civil rights. Years after his death, he was awarded the title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’ In this paper, I will examine many different aspects of Lincoln’s presidency in order to come to a conclusion: whether this title bestowed unto Lincoln was deserved, or not. In order to fully understand Lincoln, it is necessary to understand the motives that drove this man to action. While some of his intentions may not have been for the welfare of slaves, but for the preservation of the Union, the actions still stand. Abraham Lincoln, though motivated by his devotion to his nation, made the first blows against the institution of slavery and rightfully earned his title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’
Lincoln is famously known for ending slavery. He Issued the Emancipation of Proclamation. The presidential proclamation was issued during the American Civil War. Lincoln stated in his speech, "I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of states, and henceforward shall be free." The states he was referring to were the 11 out of 22 states that still had slavery. It was because of Lincoln that millions ...
Lincoln 's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, was to up the North 's support so they wouldn 't go to the confederate side. Not only a change in North war, but a change in the slavery, like granting the slaves their freedom so they wouldn 't have any more slave revolts which would cause even more chaos in other words another war. "The Emancipation Proclamation granted freedom to the slaves in the Confederate states if the states did not return to the Union by January 1,1863. In addition, under the proclamation, freedom would only come to the slaves if the Union won the war." Abraham Lincoln president at the time, the northerners also known as the Union, the south also known as the confederates, and slave states still in
Contrary to what today’s society believes about Lincoln, he was not a popular man with the South at this time. The South wanted to expand towards the West, but Lincoln created a geographical containment rule keeping slavery in the states it currently resided in. Despite his trying to rationalize with the South, Lincoln actually believed something different ”Lincoln claimed that he, like the Founding Fathers, saw slavery in the Old South as a regrettable reality whose expansion could and should be arrested, thereby putting it on the long and gradual road ”ultimate extinction” (216). He believed it to be “evil” thus “implying that free southerners were evil for defending it”(275). Lincoln wanted to wipe out slavery for good, and the South could sense his secret motives.
When the Civil War was approaching its third year, United States President Abraham Lincoln was able to make the slaves that were in Confederate states that were still in rebellion against the Union forever free. Document A states that on January 1, 1863, Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation and that every enslaved person residing in the states that were “In rebellion against the United States” were free and that the Executive Government of the United States and that the military and naval authority were to recognize them and could not act against them at all. Although the Proclamation did not free every slave in the Confederacy, it was able to release about 3.5 million slaves. Along with freeing all of those slaves, it also stated that African American men were allowed to enlist with the Union and aid them in the war.
He wisely used the issue of slavery to appeal to both the abolitionists and to Negrophobes, Northerners who were afraid of living side-by- side with Negroes and competing with them for jobs. For example, on July 10th of 1959, Lincoln gave a speech in Chicago, a primarily abolitionist town. Lincoln stated that inequality was unnecessary in this country. If all men were created equal then were should look past race, saying, “Let us discard all these things, and unite as one people throughout this land, until we shall once more stand up declaring that all men are created equal” (Hofstadter, pg. 148).
Abraham Lincoln is one of the most celebrated presidents in United States history. There have been many debates on whether Abraham Lincoln believed what he was saying and whether is racist or not. For this essay we will be looking at the theory at the theories presented by Dr. Malone on racial paternalism and racial ascriptivism and see how that could be applied to President Lincoln. Looking at Dr. Malone’s definition of racial paternalism as an ideology in which whites were obligated to help blacks uplift themselves morally and educationally. That everyone needs to assimilate to the standers set by white people. On the other hand racial ascriptivism is on ideology that blacks were inherently inferior to, whites. That black individuals should