The Emancipation Proclamation Rhetorical Analysis

1140 Words3 Pages

A Rhetorical Analysis of “The Emancipation Proclamation” The drive to end slavery in the United States was a long one, from being debated in the writing of the Declaration of Independence, to exposure of its ills in literature, from rebellions of slaves, to the efforts of people like Harriet Tubman to transport escaping slaves along the Underground Railroad. Abolitionists had urged President Abraham Lincoln to free the slaves in the Confederate states from the very outset of the Civil War. By mid-1862, Lincoln had become increasingly convinced of the moral imperative to end slavery, but he hesitated (History.com). As commander-in-chief of the Union Army, he had military objectives to consider (History.com). On one hand, emancipation might …show more content…

The use of statistics and facts are not needed to provide a stronger argument. While not directly stated in the text, it can be inferred that President Lincoln had logical reasoning in “The Emancipation Proclamation”. It can be argued that President Lincoln could infer through logical reasoning that slaves might actively sabotage the Southern war effort after the announcement of “The Emancipation Proclamation”. He could also reason that the end of slavery would weaken the South’s fragile economy by withholding their labor. In fact, thousands of slaves had already escaped to sanctuary in Union territory to places like Fort Monroe in Virginia. These refugees aided the war effort by providing information on Confederate movements and supply lines, but they were not yet eligible for protection under the law (History.com). Instead, they were classified as contraband, enemy property subject to seizure. Emancipation would offer them civil rights. Lincoln also hoped emancipation of Southern slaves would persuade African Americans in the Northern states to enlist in the Union Army. Finally, an abolitionist course might dissuade Britain and France from lending military support to Confederate States (History.com). Both nations had ended slavery in their own countries but retained economic interests in Southern goods and plantation crops. So overall, emancipation seemed not only the …show more content…

About 3,000 enslaved people who had been living in the shadows of the capital and the White House were freed. Their former masters were compensated from a government fund. They received up to $300 per slave, at the time considered very generous (History.com). The Act had three very interesting provisions. One, anyone who had fought for the Confederacy or given aid and comfort to Confederate soldiers could not make a claim for compensation (History.com). Two, kidnapping a citizen of the District back into slavery was deemed a felony. Anyone found guilty of that crime would serve a sentence of 5 to 20 years in prison (History.com). And three, a separate fund was set up to help newly-freed persons emigrate to Liberia, Haiti, or such other country beyond the limits of the United States as the president might determine (History.com). On April 19, three days after Lincoln signed the Act, the District 's African American population celebrated with a huge parade. Historians estimate that half the city 's black population participated and 10,000 people lined the streets to watch the joyous marchers

Open Document