Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of the Abolitionist movement into American politics
Slavery and its importance
Introduction of the Abolitionist movement into American politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Kristen McNamara
HIS 108
Essay #2
4/13/18
Slavery in Abina and the Important Men
One of the most important parts in our history involves the influence of slavery throughout Africa. In the graphic novel, Abina and the Important Men, by Getz and Clarke, the true story of a young girl, Abina who was wrongly enslaved in the Gold Coast Protectorate, present day Ghana.(116) In 1875, slavery was abolished there, and Abina goes on trial, suing her previous “master”. This story is particularly significant due to the fact that it is a true story. One theme that is present throughout this remarkable graphic novel is - What does it mean to be a slave? Many characters had their own specific perspectives on slavery, specifically by the “important men”,
…show more content…
and though some of these perceptions were similar, many contradicted each other, along with Abina’s own perceptions. Throughout the story, Abina’s experiences in the novel are shaped directly by the “important men” that she is consistently surrounded by.
As the novel progresses, the reader learns more about what an “important man” refers to - a man who has some sort of influence, whether it be at the local level or all the way up to the level with the British. (122) The most significant of these men include William Melton, James Davis, James Hutton Brew, and Quamina Eddo. Firstly, William Melton is the acting judicial assessor during Abina’s trial. (128) Throughout the story, Melton is torn between sympathy between sympathy for Abina and the morality of slavery. (137) He seems to be an overall good person with morals, though at the start he does express to Davis, Abina’s attorney, that he feels that he has been put into a tough situation due to the British relying on these ‘important men’, Abina’s former “owners” to produce palm oil for them. (14) He also told them that they “do not want to start a legal battle with them”. (14) His overall views on slavery are very straightforward. (139) When he is assessing the case, he asks questions such as: “Did any money change …show more content…
hands, or were any rituals denoting enslavement carried out?, Was the witness physically abused?, Was the witness called a slave?, What sort of labor was the witness required to do, and was he or she paid for it?”. (89) This shows that he has very specific and formulaic ideals on what a slave is. (139) In the end, Melton finds Eddo not guilty strongly due to his belief that that Yaw Awoah, the man who left Abina with Quamina Eddo, only left Abina with Eddo while he was on a business trip, and did not sell her as a slave. (139) Additionally, he most likely ruled in favor of Eddo due to not wanting upsetting Abina’s former owners. (130) The next important man in the story is James Davis. James Davis was the prosecutor and interpreter for the colonial courts. (130) When Abina initially ran away, she shortly found Davis and he sheltered her and aided her when asked. (10) Davis was a strong advocate against slavery, and most likely represented the average African man in his colony. (127) He was very nice towards Abina and made sure that her former owners did not find her when they came looking for her. (130) While sheltering her, he says to her, “Well, it’s true that there is no legal slavery here in Cape Coast, or throughout the colony and protectorate. But look, the government doesn’t have the money or the ability to enforce the laws everywhere”. When she tells him that she wants to go to court against her former owners, he is initially taken aback, due to the fact that he doesn’t believe that it would be effective. (12) He eventually agreed to present Abina’s case, but he voiced his concerns of Quamina Eddoo’s power. (12) Often, he reminded Abina that though if he had owned her as a slave, he was still an important man, and the British did not like to alienate important men. (12) Throughout the graphic novel, Davis stands by Abina’s side and never treats her poorly, showing that he must have strong beliefs against slavery. (148) He also shows traits of being a Christian. (131) Another important man involved in Abina’s trial is James Hutton Brew. Brew was the defense attorney, prince, newspaper founder and lawyer. (130) Brew defends Quamina Eddoo during the trial. (130) He was an educated man and advises Eddoo on the best way to beat Abina in court. (130) Throughout the story, his actions seem very harsh and malicious towards Abina. (42) Undoubtedly, many lawyers do have to be firm to get their point across, but during scenes where he is alone and talking to Eddoo behind the scenes, he seems to strongly believe that Eddoo had not done anything wrong. (149) His actions show that Brew most likely either does not see anything wrong with slavery, or what Quamina Eddoo did was not truly slavery. (148) He argues that Abina never saw any exchange of money, so there is no proof that she was actually bought. (42) Also, she didn't do any traditional slave labor, she just worked in the house. (42) Additionally, he argues that though she was never paid with money, she was receiving food and clothing, and that these services could count as payment just as easily. (42) The final important man that is significant to the story is Quamina Eddoo. (131) Eddoo is the defendant who is a wealthy man from Saltpond. (131) He is Abina’s perceived ex-owner. (131) Throughout Abina’s time as his slave, she lived with his sister, Eccoah. (5) During her time there, she did mostly housework, but was threatened to beatings multiple times. Abina’s final straw was when Eddoo attempted to force Abina to marry Tando. (7) She even refused notwithstanding being whipped, and ran away rather than marrying him. (7) Quamina Eddoo stated that he did not believe that Abina was her slave and that she worked for him and his sister. (34) It is difficult to determine whether or not he truly believed this, or if he was lying to the court. (33) Although, when he interacted with Brew behind the scenes, he did seem slightly anxious. (32) Throughout the graphic novel, many of the important men’s opinions on slavery was similar, but some did contradict each other in some aspects. Firstly, some of the important men’s perceptions of slavery have some similarities. The first similarity between these men’s perceptions is that they all seem to morally understand that slavery is wrong. Though this occurs on different levels, it is something that they all share. This is easily seen through the entire purpose of the trial - to prove Eddoo’s innocence, indicating that slavery is morally wrong. Additionally, on separate occasions each character has shown some type of morality on the topic of slavery, whether it be on the level of Davis or Brew. (128) Moreover, something that all of these people have in common is that they are a tool to the British - all of the important men have been influenced by them in some way, shape, or form. (128) The type of influence from the British, more than anything else, leads to slightly similar perceptions on slavery, as well as other aspects of life. Secondly, the important men all shared certain beliefs that were similar to the British. In Britain the “Civilizing Mission” began during the Industrial revolution and the rise of the middle class. (122) This resulted in the rise of Evangelism, encouraging many to live by a certain set of morals/values. Many of these values led to the liberal ideals of the abolition of slavery in England, as well as the rest of Europe. Eventually, many of these ideas were transferred over to Africa, as well. Though the ideas did make an appearance within Africa, many Africans were not seen as civil and were “unworthy of self rule”, due to the idea that they were not independent and could not look after themselves. (122) Consequently, the British took over to “protect” them, and enforced their own rules, one of which being the removal of slavery. (122) Though there were smilier themes among the men, there were additionally some contradictions among them. Overall, the biggest issue in interpreting each of the important men’s views on slavery is difficult due to the fact that there was a large communication barrier between all of the men, and the word “master” in each of their languages could signify different things. (139) There were several examples where this word seems to be misunderstood. One example from reading the transcripts, Melton asks Abina “When Eccoah said “Your master” what did she mean?” ( p 85) . Additionally, there is a hazy line between what is considered a “free person” and what is considered a “slave”. (139) This proved to be difficult due to the economic influence and thirst for palm oil by British consumers. Additionally, there were gendered differences throughout British society. (163) Namely, women typically did tend to do housework, which is what Abina typically did while she believed she was a slave, leading in the wavering ideals of if she was a slave or not. (145) Notwithstanding, this lead to questions being asked regarding to the type of labor that was expected from Abina, if she was forced to perform this labor, if physical abuse took place, and if there was a marriage ceremony. Additionally, Abina was asked if she understood what Eccoah meant when she said “your master”. Due to the communication barrier between the two, Abina was not able to answer. This was extremely damaging to her case due to the fact that the word “master” is commonly used in relationship to slavery, but she could not indicate that. Furthermore, Abina had a very different view on slavery than the important men involved in the trial. (151) When asked the difference between a free person and a slave, she states, “when a free person is sitting down at ease the slave is working that is what I know”., “I had been sold and I had no will of my own and I could not look after my body and health”. This indicates that Abina clearly did understand the difference between the two, but that there was an unfortunate language barrier between herself and the important men. Abina was a fairly strong willed woman, and ran away even though women were far less likely to run away and take their slave owners to court, most likely as a plea to be heard. (151) Though Abina viewed slavery through a fairly different lens than the important men in the graphic novel, there were a few similarities that were also present. The greatest example of this is through the ideals that slavery is morally wrong. (149) This is seen through the defending of Eddo on the behalf of many of the important men, and through Abina’s initial suing of her former master. (149) Throughout the whole process, there was an underlying understanding that slavery was wrong, and the issue of whether or not it was done in this specific instance. (149) Moreover, Abina’s story was extremely gendered. (163) Through this gendering, it shines a light on the ways in which slave owners attempted to hide their abundance of slaves through marrying them, or giving them to someone else to marry. (163) In conclusion, throughout the graphic novel, Abina and the Important Men, by Getz and Clarke, Abina has seemingly steadfast beliefs about slavery.
These beliefs differ greatly from the “important men” in the novel, including Melton, Davis, Brew and Quamina Eddo. These men’s perceptions on slavery are similar, yet also slightly contradictory of each other. This can be seen through the important men’s influence with the British, and Abina’s own direct experiences with slavery. This story is tremendously important and hit upon some serious aspects that are extremely relevant within African
history. Works Cited Getz, Trevor R. and Liz Clarke. Abina and the Important Men, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
The book The Classic Slave Narratives is a collection of narratives that includes the historical enslavement experiences in the lives of the former slaves Harriet Jacobs, Frederick Douglass, and Olaudah Equiano. They all find ways to advocate for themselves to protect them from some of the horrors of slavery, such as sexual abuse, verbal abuse, imprisonment, beatings, torturing, killings and the nonexistence of civil rights as Americans or rights as human beings. Also, their keen wit and intelligence leads them to their freedom from slavery, and their fight for freedom and justice for all oppressed people.
Slave-owners looked upon the African Americans as lesser people who were in desperate need of support. They were not capable of surviving on their own without white guidance (Boston). Dr. Flint, the master over the plantation where Harriet Jacobs lived showed a great example of paternalism. He cared for Harriet but in a possessive way to which he continuously sought the woman for his personal needs. For Dr. Flint, the slaves he owned should be grateful towards him and be willing to do what he asked with no rebuttal. This wasn’t the case with Harriet. She simply refused him at every chance which only angered the slaveholder. Jacobs resisted the doctor and his paternalistic ways. Harriet Jacobs sheds light onto the self-interest that drives the paternalism displayed by the masters. The slaves were property and who wanted to showcase poorly groomed property? If there was someone visiting, the slaves, except for those within the house, would be hidden away and those who worked within the master’s home would dawn nicer clothes and better meals would be prepared all in a show for the
Throughout history, slaves have been treated like animals and thought of as property, not human beings. Even Oroonoko, a handsome, statuesque prince is turned into a slave because of his race, and is degraded and mistreated. To racist slave owners, the horrible treatment of Africans was acceptable because they were a different species, and no amount of education or beauty could save them. Behn shows how unjust and brutal slavery is in Oroonoko. The treatment of slaves is comparable to the treatment of the poor, as both have few rights, and both are unjustly judged and mistreated based on social status.
In the novel, the author proposes that the African American female slave’s need to overcome three obstacles was what unavoidably separated her from the rest of society; she was black, female, and a slave, in a white male dominating society. The novel “locates black women at the intersection of racial and sexual ideologies and politics (12).” White begins by illustrating the Europeans’ two major stereotypes o...
In, “The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass”, readers get a first person perspective on slavery in the South before the Civil War. The author, Frederick Douglass, taught himself how to read and write, and was able to share his story to show the evils of slavery, not only in regard to the slaves, but with regard to masters, as well. Throughout Douglass’ autobiography, he shares his disgust with how slavery would corrupt people and change their whole entire persona. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to help establish his credibility, and enlighten his readers about what changes needed to be made.
The issue of Slavery in the South was an unresolved issue in the United States during the seventeenth and eighteenth century. During these years, the south kept having slavery, even though most states had slavery abolished. Due to the fact that slaves were treated as inferior, they did not have the same rights and their chances of becoming an educated person were almost impossible. However, some information about slavery, from the slaves’ point of view, has been saved. In this essay, we are comparing two different books that show us what being a slave actually was. This will be seen with the help of two different characters: Linda Brent in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Frederick Douglass in The Narrative of the life of Frederick
Throughout history, it is not uncommon for stories to become silenced; especially, when such a story is being told by the voice of a slave's. Slaves were not granted the same equal rights as the free men. They also were not seen as whole individuals -- worth less than the average citizen, to be sold and traded as property. Abina Mansha was a female slave whom once lived in Asante but came to live in the British Gold Coast Colony during 1876, after being sold to Guamin Eddoo by her husband, Yawawhah. As Abina claims in her testimony, her purchase was no accident. "Slavery had been abolished throughout the British Empire, a law extended into the Gold Coast in 1874. Yet ironically, the demand for laborers on the growing palm oil plantations and in the houses of those who own them means that the trade in slaves into the Gold Coast does not dry up following the war" (Getz and Clark, 2011, p. 6). Abina And The Important Men: A Graphic History written by Trevor R. Getz and Liz Clarke, but spoken in different perspectives, helps shed light on Abina's personal lifestyle; while the date and location provides us with further insight on how the world reacted to 19th century Western culture.
Despite the fact that a plethora of historical references regarding slavery and the Atlantic slave trade exist, Smallwood interestingly and uniquely comes up with a book more personal to the inner workings of the slave trade. Smallwood wrote a chronicle that places more importance on personal experiences to enlighten the readers in a more captivating fashion. This point of view is showcased when she identifies an old African female slave named ‘Sibe...
In Frederick Douglass’s Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, one of the major themes is how the institution of slavery has an effect on the moral health of the slaveholder. The power slaveholders have over their slaves is great, as well as corrupting. Douglass uses this theme to point out that the institution of slavery is bad for everyone involved, not just the slaves. Throughout the narrative, Douglass uses several of his former slaveholders as examples. Sophia Auld, once such a kind and caring woman, is transformed into a cruel and oppressive slave owner over the course of the narrative. Thomas Auld, also. Douglass ties this theme back to the main concern of authorial control. Although this is a personal account, it is also a tool of propaganda, and is used as such. Douglass’s intent is to convince readers that the system of slavery is horrible and damaging to all included, and thus should be abolished completely. Douglass makes it very clear in his examples how exactly the transformation occurs and how kind and moral people can become those who beat their slaves and pervert Christianity in an attempt to justify it.
When one thinks of slavery, they may consider chains holding captives, beaten into submission, and forced to work indefinitely for no money. The other thing that often comes to mind? Stereotypical African slaves, shipped to America in the seventeenth century. The kind of slavery that was outlawed by the 18th amendment, nearly a century and a half ago. As author of Modern Slavery: The Secret World of 27 Million People, Kevin Bales, states, the stereotypes surrounding slavery often confuse and blur the reality of slavery. Although slavery surely consists of physical chains, beatings, and forced labor, there is much more depth to the issue, making slavery much more complex today than ever before.
When studying history, specifically Abina’s case, through a broader perspective, biases between a slave and his master was what determined the verdict in Abina’s case. The main issue that was heavily involved throughout the case was the background selection of the jury.
At first glance, the book “my bondage and my freedom by Frederick Douglass appeared to be extremely dull and frustrating to read. After rereading the book for a second time and paying closer attention to the little details I have realized this is one of the most impressive autobiographies I have read recently. This book possesses one of the most touching stories that I have ever read, and what astonishes me the most about the whole subject is that it's a true story of Douglass' life. “ Douglass does a masterful job of using his own experience to expose the injustice of slavery to the world. As the protagonist he is able to keep the reader interested in himself, and tell the true story of his life. As a narrator he is able to link those experiences to the wider experiences of the nation and all society, exposing the corrupting nature of slavery to the entire nation.”[1] Although this book contributes a great amount of information on the subject of slavery and it is an extremely valuable book, its strengths are overpowered by its flaws. The book is loaded with unnecessary details, flowery metaphors and intense introductory information but this is what makes “My Bondage and My Freedom” unique.
The deployment of a metaphorics of slavery as a way of representing forms of domestic oppression is, from one perspective, both rhetorically powerful and a politically radical maneuver. Yet from another perspective--that precisely of those who are or have been enslaved, experienced the metaphor, as it were--such a strategy can only be viewed as deeply problematic. (67-8)
"The Life of Olaudah Equiano” is a captivating story in which Equiano, the author, reflects on his life from becoming a slave to a freeman during the 19th century. Through his experiences and writing, Equiano paints a vivid picture of the atrocities and cruelties of European slavery. Ultimately through his narrative, Equiano intends to persuade his audience, the British government, to abolish the Atlantic slave trade as well as alert them of the harsh treatment of slaves. He successfully accomplishes his goal by subtly making arguments through the use of character, action, and setting.
The representatives of colonialism in these stories are white men in positions of superiority. In King’s story, they take the role of anthropologists, well-educated and well-dressed, while in Achebe’s story, the white man is a supervisor in charge of overseeing everything the black main character does. The presence of these men, all of European descent, is a metaphor for the manner in which the original colonist behaved. The supervisor’s position of authority over the ‘lesser’ black man is reflective of the attitude that causes loss of heritage, while in King’s story the attitude the anthropologists display is that of the conqueror: expecting to have their wants (to hear an old traditional story) met by those who have been conquered. They do not even deign to sit with the person they are asking this of. “These three like to stand. Stand still.” (pg... p...) These characters remain nameless and faceless, only known by their titles, throughout both stories. Perhaps this is because their true purpose in the story is not as a character, but as a symbol for the attitudes of the colonists.