Essay Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And The Cask Of Amontillado

665 Words2 Pages

A man who would never commit murder ends up murdering someone else, and another man bloodthirsty for revenge murders someone close to them. Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and Montresor from “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe are both characters who are felonious because they murdered someone. They are both main characters who were experiencing strange choices, having to kill someone, and to carefully planning through details to reach their goal. However, one man never thought he would kill someone, but the other man, bloodthirsty. Both of the main characters are very similar in mental and physical aspects. Both of these stories are strange and unrealistic in most cases because many people wouldn’t be stuck on an island with an insane man, and many people wouldn’t bring someone down into catacombs to lock them to a chain and leave them there. They both killed someone before the story resolved, and in order to achieve what both characters wanted they had to meticulously plan how to reach it. Rainsford knew, “"I will not lose my nerve. I will not." He slid down from the tree, and struck off again into the woods. His face was …show more content…

Montresor seeks revenge, and is rather demented and berserk. He obtrudes Fortunato’s evening by taking him to test wine and along the way he lashes out at Fortunato a few times in the story which is rather scary. He says at the very beginning, “the thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could; but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge” (p. 372). No matter what happened Montresor vowed that he would get revenge on Fortunato no matter how and when he got his revenge. Montresor had a long time to develop a strong plan that wouldn’t get him in trouble or caught because he didn’t want to go to jail for committing a murder. Both of these characters are different, and have strange reasons for their

Open Document