Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Formal analysis on an art piece
Formal analysis on an art piece
Artwork analysis example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Spending time looking at art is a way of trying to get into an artists’ mind and understand what he is trying to tell you through his work. The feeling is rewarding in two distinctive ways; one notices the differences in the style of painting and the common features that dominate the art world. When comparing the two paintings, The Kneeling Woman by Fernand Leger and Two Women on a Wharf by Willem de Kooning, one can see the similarities and differences in the subjects of the paintings, the use of colors, and the layout
The first and most obvious similarity is both paintings are about women. Although the subjects in both works of art are women, the Two Women on a Wharf painting appear to have heavy hearts and look to be consoling each other,
…show more content…
while the women in the Kneeling Woman painting seems to be praying to a higher power. Also, the two women on the wharf seem to be hugging and possibly giving each other some words of comfort while the kneeling woman looks to possibly be doing her praying in a catherdral. Both painters use different colors in their paintings to bring about the shapes of a woman.
Also, since it’s hard for the viewer to see any emotion the women are feeling in either painting by looking at their faces, the two painters appear to have used colors to create the tone. The feeling of gloom that surrounds the two women on a wharf with the color suggests that they have not found what they have been looking for so their sorrow will last a little longer. The kneeling woman has a brighter background probably depicting that she has found solace or love where she currently kneels. Between the two paintings, the kneeling woman seems to have a brighter looking future ahead of her.
The layout of the two paintings is quite different. The layout in the Kneeling Woman for instance, is that of straight apparent lines and shapes while the lines in the Two Women on a Wharf are faded out by the artist and creates more of a chaos tone. This is perhaps why the two artists decided to name their paintings the way they did as a clue to what the viewer is looking at. The Two Women on a Wharf comes out as a painting done on the spur of the moment whereas the Kneeling Woman appears to have been a carefully thought out painting that necessitated prior
planning. Ultimately, the two artist want the viewer to be able to relate to the subjects of their respective paintings. One wonders what the subjects are going through. Their poses as well as the lack of a face to convey their emotions is the artists’ way of showing the viewer that emotions can be perceived through color and even the layout of a painting. In this regard, both paintings achieve their intended purpose despite the obvious clues in the names of the paintings.
If someone who had no prior knowledge about art, or the elements and principles of design, were given five seconds to look at these two paintings, they’d probably say they had almost nothing in common, other than the fact that they both feature mountains, and it’d be true for those people. But, if you are someone that does know a lot of information
The two paintings have much more differences than meets the eye. Firstly, the periods during which the portraits are made are very distinct with a difference of an estimate of four centuries. Mona Lisa's portrait was made in the early 1500s while that of Adele Bloch-Bauer was painted in the early 1900s. Many transitions took place since the Renaissance period to the post-industrialization period. Possibly, this could be used to explain the clear-cut differences between the two. Secondly, the portrait of Mona is half-length her full body while that of Adele is full length. This depicts a varied art in use of space by the two artists. Thirdly, the two subjects display a discrete type of clothing. Mona is quite ordinary and simple despite the
In conclusion, the pieces have a variety of similarities as well as differences. Both pieces are double portraits that show the difference in time periods in which they were created and the way artistic tastes change over time. Both works of art seem to express differences between light and dark. Though both pieces have similar subject matters they vary in the use of medium and technique to create stark contrast with each other.
I prefer the Women Picking Olives painting because it doesn’t give to much detail about its interpretation and lets the observer think of what is happening himself. I interpret the Women Picking Olives as women who were abused and are forced to strictly follow rules and do endeavors or else they would be punished.
The first painting analyzed was North Country Idyll by Arthur Bowen Davis. The focal point was the white naked woman. The white was used to bring her out and focus on the four actual colored males surrounding her. The woman appears to be blowing a kiss. There is use of stumato along with atmospheric perspective. There is excellent use of color for the setting. It is almost a life like painting. This painting has smooth brush strokes. The sailing ship is the focal point because of the bright blue with extravagant large sails. The painting is a dry textured flat paint. The painting is evenly balanced. When I look at this painting, it reminds me of settlers coming to a new world that is be founded by its beauty. It seems as if they swam from the ship.
Comparing different works of art from one artist can help a person gain a better understanding of an artist and the purpose of their artwork. An artist’s works of art usually have similarities as well as differences when compared together. Sandy Skoglund is a photographer that stages entire rooms to create a scene for her photographs. Skoglund uses painting, sculpture, and photography to create her artwork. Due to the fact that most of her photographs are created in similar ways, almost all of her photographs have similar components represented throughout the photographs. Differences can be found in her artwork as well. Skoglund’s Revenge of The Goldfish, 1981 (Figure 1), is a popular work of art that is represented at the Akron Art Museum
Rachel Ruysch and Georgia O’Keeffe were two great women artists working over two centuries apart but despite that they painted the similar subjects, they couldn’t have been more different in the ways they painted them and their reasons for doing so. Rachel Ruysch used still life and flowers to become a prominent painter in a time where women couldn’t study anatomy or have models which was a much more prominent subject during her time. Georgia O’Keeffe, on the other hand, denies all connection of her gender and her paintings.
The painting done by Pablo Picasso, Les Demoiselles d 'Avignon (The Young Ladies of Avignon), and the painting done by Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Bathers at Moritzburg, may seem similar in many ways but are actually on opposite ends of the painting world of their time.
Not only that, even though they both have some similarity to each other, I notice more difference than similarity in the portraits. Portrait of Isabella d'este was made in 1534-1536 on oil on wood with dark black brown background. Unlike the Portraits of a Lady who looked down during her portraits, Isabella d'este is looking up but not directly towards the viewers. While observing more on both portraits, I notice the light that shined down on Isabella d'este is coming from her right top corner of the painting. On the other hand, Portraits of a Lady were made in 1460 on oil on oak panel with the light source coming from the left top
The Stranded Ship on East Hampton Beach by Thomas Moran and Abstraction by Marsden Hartley are both found in the Museum of Fine Arts of Houston. They are both extremely different such as visual elements, technique, and also different time periods. The culture and background of these painters influenced how their painting looks like which explains the difference of both paintings. Moran is known for landscapes and Hartley is known for abstract ideas which is a huge difference.
In the paint “Washington crossing the Delaware” by Emanuel Leutze and the poem Washington crossing the Delaware” by David Shulman are very similar but do have differences.
Although, both paintings are portraits, they vastly differ in their choice of subject; Marylin is a portrait of the iconic celebrity, while American Gothic portrays an ordinary farmer holding a pitchfork, as symbol of hard labour, posing with his daughter or young wife.
When looking at a piece of art a sense of wonder and beauty bewitches the beholder.
In Confronting Images, Didi-Huberman considers disadvantages he sees in the academic approach of art history, and offers an alternative method for engaging art. His approach concentrates on that which is ‘visual’ long before coming to conclusive knowledge. Drawing support from the field of psycho analytics (Lacan, Freud, and Kant and Panofsky), Didi-Huberman argues that viewers connect with art through what he might describe as an instance of receptivity, as opposed to a linear, step-by-step analytical process. He underscores the perceptive mode of engaging the imagery of a painting or other work of art, which he argues comes before any rational ‘knowing’, thinking, or discerning. In other words, Didi-Huberman believes one’s mind ‘sees’ well before realizing and processing the object being looked at, let alone before understanding it. Well before the observer can gain any useful insights by scrutinizing and decoding what she sees, she is absorbed by the work of art in an irrational and unpredictable way. What Didi-Huberman is s...
Through the appearance that the paintings gave off of the thought out analyzations of the different aspects, the viewer is encourages to look at the different parts of the painting. This experience really made me think about what really needs to go into the paintings. It made me realize that sometimes like in some of the paintings the unfinished parts are really the most revealing. This is almost paralleled with us as human beings. It is almost always the unfinished or unrefined part of a person that creates that humanity that everyone looks for. It makes everyone feel comfortable because you are still on the same playing field. The same goes for art the unrefined parts reveal what it took to go from that part to some of the more finished parts of a painting. Through these different components of the paintings another can see what they need to do in order to get to where they may want to