Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter 4 review sheet social structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chapter 4 review sheet social structure
Through the comparison of Lord of the Flies and the Hunger Games Trilogy with both displaying independent survival skills, failed leadership, and inhumanity, Golding’s and Collin’s thesis is proved that a stable society is incapable of being reached when the individual’s needs are put before the group’s. In both the Island in Lord of the Flies and the Arena in Hunger Games, the children must resort to their individual survival skills, putting the needs of themselves in front of others, ultimately endangering the fate of them all. The boys of the island resort to savagery, threatening animals for their own benefit, which results in their own civilization's downfall. From, “this dreadful eruption from an unknown world [making] the sow frantic,” …show more content…
with, “terrified squealing,” when, “the hunters hurled themselves at her,” the selfishness of the boy’s survival skills are shown (Golding 135). The children slaughter an innocent mother pig, killing their only source of food, for pure amusement as well as for food. The boys could care less when it comes to the world around them, only interested in their current desires. However, the boys receive consequences from their actions, being as they no longer have a food source, which comes back to bite them in the bum just like they had to the pig and the, “sting of another spear in her flank” (Golding 135). Similarly to the boys, Katniss acts out for herself, resulting in chaos in their society. When Katniss, “injured and treed”, is surrounded by, “the pack below [her],”, she resorts to indirectly killing her predators having, “the Careers [wake] to a full-scale tracker jacker attack,” and, “Glimmer twitching to death on the ground,” in order to survive (Collins “Hunger” 190-191). Katniss must kill her fellow tribute so that she can individually escape danger. With this final resort of dropping the genetically engineered mutations onto the Careers, Katniss endangers the safety of a group of people so that she can solely survive. Katniss is perceived by the audience poorly, because she acted for herself, killing the fan-favorite Careers, ultimately upsetting the Capitol. Under the leadership of Jack Merridew in Lord of Flies and President Snow in the Hunger Games, both societies fail because the militant leader puts his needs before the good of the people.
When Jack is given the responsibility of tending the fire, he leads his followers to his own personal desires, rather than do what is best for the group, resulting in their own downfall. Ralph, frustrated with Jack, says, “There was a ship...You said you’d keep the fire going and you let it out,” to which Jack responds, “We can light the fire again...You should have seen the blood!” (Golding 70). Jack has put what he wanted, the ability to prove his strength and leadership by killing the pig, before the entire group’s desires of being rescued, thinking they will have another opportunity to be rescued. With this power struggle between Ralph and Jack, the other boys think it is okay to go against their original leader, Ralph. So from this point on, the boys turn to savagery like their new leader Jack, putting their individual desires before their need of being rescued, eventually leading to the murders of Simon and Piggy. President Snow, much like Jack, exhibits a self-beneficiary motive when it comes to leading a group of people. Snow creates a society where, “In the Capitol they’re vomiting for the pleasure of filling their bellies again and again. Not from some illness of body or mind, not from spoiled food,” in which, “societies starve out their while the Capitol thrives” (“Catching …show more content…
Fire” 80). President Snow chooses to pamper his friends and family, lavishly and to the extreme of having too much food, rather than give the majority of the people Panem just enough food to survive. From this unequal distribution of wealth, it is impossible for this kind of society to flourish when the majority of its people are struck by poverty and are just struggling to survive off of rations each and every day. Both the boys of the island and the tributes of the districts resort to inhumanity, brutally killing one another, once again putting their selfish needs before anyone else’s.
In Lord of the Flies, Roger puts his desires before Piggy’s, and ultimately the civilization’s. “High overhead, Roger with a sense of delirious abandonment leaned all his weight on the lever,” and, “the rock struck Piggy” (Golding 192-193). Roger kills the enemy of the group: Piggy, because he is trying to bring civilization to a group of savages. So, without thinking about how this will affect the group, Roger goes right ahead and murders Piggy, killing civilization, and the order and wisdom inside of it. In the Hunger Games arena, Marvel kills Rue without thinking of the good of the people, leading to the society of District 11’s downfall. The tributes must put on a spectacle: a fight to the death, in order to gain donations from the sponsors. However, after the death of the District 11 tribute Rue, District 11 explodes in riot, protesting the demise of the fallen girl (Hunger Games). With this uprising, many people are killed for going against the Capitol. Marvel puts his needs of proving that he can murder the enemy, before others, not thinking about how it will affect a
society.
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
Who loves actin? Who doesn’t like following the rules? Most teens, that who. The Hunger games by Gary Ross and Anthem by Ayn Rand are packed tight with action. Neither of the main characters follow the rules. That’s why they relate so easily with teen viewers. Dystopian literature and films are currently popular among teens because Anthem has suspense and The Hunger Games has action, but both has a person who everyone can relate to in some way.
In Chapter 8 Jack says “He’s like Piggy. He says things like Piggy. He isn’t a proper chief.” He says this because Jack thinks his point of view is the right one, and it can only be the right one. This is similar to dictatorships in the past when people believe their right and anyone who doesn’t agree is the enemy. Later in the book Jack tries to get more followers by promising them psychological needs. Jack states “We’ve killed a pig and we’ve got meat. You can come and eat with us if you like.” Jack is trying to take away any of Ralph’s remaining supporters, so that Ralph is forced to follow him when all he has left is Piggy, Samneric, and a few clueless littluns. Later in this book Ralph is on his own a few hours after Piggy dies, he is considering joining Jack’s tribe because he will have food and protection. In the forest he thinks about the thought of eating fruit, and then remembering the feast and that maybe they would let him back. After that he realizes that the hunters killed Piggy and Simon, so they would kill him
Many books around throughout time have had two characters that are very similar and can be compared and contrasted. One book, The Hunger Games, introduces the characters of Katniss and Peeta in way so that they may be analyzed quite easily. Katniss and Peeta are both willing to get through the test of the Hunger Games and they both want to keep living for the sake of another person. But, at the same time they are also very different. Katniss has a more masculine personality because she enjoys hunting and scavenging, while Peeta is more reserved because he is just a dough boy and works in a bakery. While The Hunger Games has two great characters to compare and contrast, so does the classic frame narrative, Frankenstein. In Frankenstein, Mary
With such rigid and different identities, Jack and Ralph have very different priorities, making it challenging for them to work together. Ralph’s identity is threatened when Jack lets the fire burn out to go hunting, so he lashes out at him, accusing him, “I was chief, and you were going to do what I said. You talk. But you can’t even build huts-then you go off hunting and let out the fire-”(70, 71). By ignoring what Ralph told him to do, Jack threatens numerous aspects of Ralph’s identity. Ralph identifies with being elected Chief based on his plan to get rescued, so Jack’s insubordination threatens Ralph. Meanwhile,
However, as the plot progresses, Ralph faces both internal and external conflicts; from those conflicts he greatly matures. Ralph always has the strong belief that all the children will be saved from the island sooner or later; he is so sure that he even insists that they should have fire at all times to signal. However, when the boys abandon the fire which is symbolic of Ralph’s hope of getting saved, Ralph faces an internal conflict that makes him fear about their future; perhaps they will not be rescued at all. By insisting that the children should keep the fire going, he creates an external conflict with Jack whose values are different. Jack is enjoying life as a leader of the savages, and he fears that fire will possibly end his authoritarian rule over the savages. Both conflicts are resolved when Ralph finally meets the naval officer.
Upon the arrival of the boys to the island Jack immediately found himself in the center of a power struggle. Although the conflict was brief, there was still a very obvious confrontation between Jack and Ralph. Once the boys had assembled themselves there was an election to see who was to be chief. Despite the fact that Ralph was voted leader, the desire to be in command never left Jack. Jack already had some leadership skills, being head choirboy at his old school, and he continuously challenged Ralph. The greatest source of conflict between Jack and Ralph was the debate over the necessity of maintaining a fire. Ralph felt that it was necessary to keep it burning at all times while Jack believed that hunting pigs and getting meat was much more essential.
In life today, society holds many expectations of its people. Members of society are expected to behave in a civilized manner; conforming to law, following social norms, and acting with dignity and without violence. When the boys became marooned on the island, they were forced to question the expectations they had always observed. This brought about a large battle between those who decided to remain civil and those who would rather rebel. Civilization is pitted against acts of savagery in a plethora of ways in Lord of the Flies when determining who had the right to speak during assemblies, when the group hunted pigs, throughout the struggle over Piggy’s glasses, and finally with Simon’s death.
Suzanne Collins, author of the novel The Hunger Games and Tim Burton, Director of the 2010 film Alice in Wonderland contrast artificial and natural elements in their fantasy worlds. In The Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen, having to accept the set of rules forced by the Capitol, or rather the Game Makers, or Alice Kingsleigh from the 2010 film, who has to cope with the tyrannical Red Queen of Underland. These confrontations lead to a reflection of self, and the depiction of identity formation and the chaos that come along with growing up. Though the film 2010 film Alice in Wonderland and the novel The Hunger Games don’t seem to have much in common, each adventure uses characterization and imagery to portray dictatorial governmental oppression
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
Violence is a key component to the development of the theme in the book, The Lord of the Flies. The boys enter the island with a sense of freedom, and even though they are stranded on an island, there is a sense of happiness which is shown through a violent scene. The scene being when the boys kill the pig. Even though there is a sense of joy this scene also represents a turning point in the boys and adds to the theme of the book, being a society with no rules will destroy itself. This theme is brought home by the most violent scene in the book, when the boys crush Piggy with the rock. This ruleless society is destroying itself from the inside and the author uses scenes of violence to show that the boys have turned to savages and are going to end up killing each
Ralph first takes on the position as leader at the beginning of the story, when the rest of the boys vote him in as chief. He carries this position until Jack and his fellow hunters break away from the group. Ralph makes it his job to set out the rules to organize a society. Ralph always thinks of what is best for everyone and how they will all benefit from his decisions. Rules and standards are set when Ralph is the chief. He orders the group to build the basic necessities of civilization, shelters, and most importantly to keep the fire going, in hope that they will be rescued and return to humanity. "But I tell you that smoke is more important than the pig, however often you kill one" (Golding 75). Jack, on the other hand, takes on the idea of every man for himself. He does not care about making homes, only about hunting. When Jack is the leader, evil takes over and all good is destroyed. Under Jack's power both Simon and Piggy are killed.
Many books are transformed into motion pictures that usually contain plots that differ from the original publication. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies novel was transformed into two theatrical versions, the 1963 version, directed by Peter Brook and the 1990 version, directed by Harry Hook. All three of the mentioned works are about a group of boys who get stranded on an island in the middle of nowhere after their plane crashes. Here we shall contrast the differences between the two Lord of the Flies movies: the exclusion of important scenes, the exposition, and character traits.
In the novels Lord of the Flies and The Hunger Games, the settings are both alike and opposing. First of all, the environments are depicted as secluded, deserted forests with numerous resources in the surrounding area. The settings also have the characters fight for survival by having to hunt for food and search the unknown territory for beneficial resources. In The Hunger Games, the selected tributes are all struggling to survive the games, as the boys are striving to remain alive and be rescued in Lord of the Flies. On the other hand, Lord of the Flies and The Hunger Games have differentiating senses of their surrounding settings. First, in Lord of the Flies the group of British school boys did not expect themselves to be plane wrecked onto a remote island as they were orderly and well mannered young
...ives being lost, nature being destroyed, civilization crumbling around you while the people fall into the hands of savagery, and this causes people to lose their innocence. The boys on the island come to realize at the end that they have lost precious lives, destroyed the beauty of the island, and also seen that the civilization that they once had was gone. As the book says, “Like a bomb!” (Golding 28), the world is slowly becoming savage. If the world were to be like the lives of the boys while they were on the island, the world would be a disaster, and would be chaotic. Consequences of war is truly the main reason of why these boys fell apart with lives being lost, nature being destroyed, and the civilization crumbling right in front of their eyes in Lord of the Flies by William Golding.