Essay About Fighting In Hockey

1736 Words4 Pages

Fighting in Hockey: Necessary or Harmful?
For decades, fighting in hockey has been instrumental to the identity, history and high energy that brings professional hockey fans to their feet. Supported by the players, coaches, and average fan, fighting has brought a unique dynamic to hockey that is unseen in any other sport in the world. However, fighting in hockey is one of the most debated themes in all sports. Although entertaining, some argue that the dangerous elements of fighting outweigh the benefits that it may bring to the players out on the ice or the fans sitting in the stands. Already banned in most minor hockey levels, some are advocating for fighting to be eliminated from Major Junior Hockey and professional leagues like the National …show more content…

In retrospect, a majority of players, former players, and hockey legends like Bobby Orr continue to support fighting as they believe it is essential to the security of the game. Since many players and fans seem to support the intensity and energy fighting brings to the game, shouldn’t fighting remain a part of hockey and its identity? Or do the possible long-term health issues and violence fighting may advocate do more harm than good? In any case, it could be argued that other contact sports like boxing, mixed martial arts, or football present similar risks compared to fighting in hockey. So why is fighting in hockey receiving as much criticism as it is? It is hard to argue hockey would be less violent or dangerous without fighting. In a contact sport that already consists of body checking, possibilities of getting a puck or stick to the face, and dirty play like slashing or blindside hitting, the removal of fighting would not decrease the risk associated in hockey. The abolishment of fighting in hockey would only remove the excitement, history, and …show more content…

With or without fighting, hockey is undoubtedly one of the most violent sports in the world. Even so, other contact sports like boxing, mixed martial arts, or football arguably create a comparable or higher danger in comparison to that of fighting in hockey. Let’s take football for example, a sport that is heavily criticized for the number of concussions and long-term brain injuries suffered. Ann McKee, a Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy researcher at Boston University believes that playing football “would not be worth the risk”, after Boston University researchers discovered that 92 of 96 brains studied of former NFL players contained some form of CTE (Perez, 2017). Additionally, Mixed martial arts and boxing are even receiving criticism after former Canadian UFC fighter Tim Hague died in a hospital shortly after being knocked out in a boxing match in June 2017 (Fox News, 2017). So what is the difference between fighting in hockey and the violence demonstrated in football or mixed martial arts? Nothing. Unfortunately, all contact sports present a risk to a person’s health and security. Players that decide to participate are taking on that risk voluntarily and if people want to simply eliminate fighting in hockey, then they must also eliminate the contact and other dangerous elements of hockey or any contact sport in general. This is realistically

Open Document