Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast different theories of motivation
Compare and contrast different theories of motivation
Motivation theorys
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Equity Theory of Motivation
Introduction:
Robbins & Judge (2007, p.186) defines Motivation “as the processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort towards attaining a goal”. Equity theory comes under process theory which gives the perception whether the individual is going to work hard or not depending upon the rewards and possible outcomes. This paper discusses and describes the equity theory of motivation with its implications to managers in the light of a real organizational example.
Analysis:
John Stacey Adams, a workplace and behavioural psychologist,” articulated a construct of equity theory on job motivation and job satisfaction in 1965” (Okpara, 2006, p.226).
“In equity theory individual make comparisons of their job inputs (for example efforts, experience, education, competence) and their outcomes (for example salary level, raises, recognition) with those of referent others and then respond to eliminate any inequities”(Robbins & Judge,2007,p.205).
This theory states that “an individual who perceives that she or he is being treated unfairly in comparison to others will be motivated to act in ways that reduce the perceived inequity”(Campling,Poole,Wiesner,Schermerhorn,2006,p.394). An individual should feel a fair balance of what he/she puts into the jobs and what he/she gets out of it. Adams called these as inputs and outcomes (Okpara, 2006). Individuals are more likely to be motivated when they feel fairly or equitably treated. And when they are unfairly treated they are highly prone to the feeling of disaffection and demotivation.
In equity theory the most crucial feature is comparison. In equity theory employees make comparisons of their job inputs (efforts) ...
... middle of paper ...
...l Psychology, 20(8), 641-662.
Campling,J.,Poole,D.,Wiesner,R. and Schermerhorn,J.R., (2006). Management. (2nd ed.). Australia: John Wiley & Sons.
Gunderson,M. (1994). Pay and Employment Equity in the United States and Canada. International Journal of Manpower,15(7), 26-43.
Ivancevich, J.M., Konopaske, R. and Matteson M.T., (2008). Organizational Behaviour and Management. (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Okpara, J.O. (2006). Gender and the relationship between perceived fairness in pay, promotion, and job pay, promotion, and job satisfaction in a sub '' Saharan African economy. Woman in Management Review, 21(3), 224 '' 240.
Robbins,S.P. and Judge,T.A.,(2007).Organizational Behaviour.(12th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Weller,L.D. (1995). The equity factor: a vital part of the quality equation. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(4), 44-50.
There were a few issues of fairness presented in Michael Simpson’s case that happens in in real world work places that prevents employees from working to their full potential or causing them to leave the work place all together. In this case study Michael Simpson is faced with the dilemma of whether or not he should leave Avery McNeil, the accounting at which he is currently working at. Simpson had interviewed with many consulting firms before graduating college, and had chosen Avery McNeil because it had the potential to allow him the most rapid advancement in his career. Within two years of working their he was promoted to manager and he received a great pay raise. However, a few days later Simpson came upon a sheet with pay grades of other
Throughout the world, discrimination in all forms has continued to be a constant struggle; whether it’s racial, gender based, religion, beliefs, appearance or anything that makes one person different from another, it’s an everyday occurrence. A major place that discrimination is occurring at is in the workplace. One of the largest problems discrimination issues is believed to be gender. Women, who have the same amount of experience as men are not getting paid at the same rate as men, these women also are equally trained and educated. According to the article Gender Pay, it was discovered in 2007 that a woman makes 81 cents for every dollar a man earns.(“Gender Pay”) . This shouldn’t be happening in today’s society for the fact the society lived in today is suppose to be more accepting. Men are viewed as being more popular, valuable and having higher powers than women. The Reason Discrimination is involved in the equal pay equal work is because of the significance it has to how some businesses pay their employees.
Satya Nadella once said, “We must ensure not only that everyone receives equal pay for equal work, but that they have the opportunity to do equal work.” It was found that women only earn seventy-nine percent of what men make in similar jobs. The gender pay gap has been in account for over fifty years, and yet it is still an issue today. Although businesses are required to practice fairness in compensation amongst all employees regardless of gender, age, or race this is not always the case. Businesses need to instill stricter policies against unequal pay to eliminate racial discrimination, reward and recognize performance and experience, and do away with the gender gap.
An extensive survey was given to blue-collar workers in 1946, then again decades later in 1986, by researchers working to discover motivational factors in the workplace (Kovach 58-61). These surveys determined that blue-collar workers across demographics of age and gender, on average, place “full appreciation of work done,” as well as “good wages,” in their upper 5 factors of motivation in the workplace (Kovach 58-61). These motivational factors on which blue-collar workers place high value are not provided to them when social discrimination, such as the current mocking of their values, and economic discrimination, such as the absence of prevailing wages, are present in society. The lack of motivation caused by this lack of key motivational factors negatively impacts the workers’ functionality, detracting from their economic output, as explained by Adam Smith and Richard Nixon when they stated that motivation is a central factor for productivity and economic success, as, if workers do not see incentives or advantages to work, the workers will abandon it (Smith 101-120; Peters and Woolley). Aside from motivational setbacks, the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health recently performed an experiment that discovered that discrimination based on the socioeconomic statuses of the
Lips, Hillary M. "The Gender Pay Gap: Challenging the Rationalizations. Perceived Equity, Discrimination, and the Limits of Human Capital Models." (n.d.): n. pag. Web.
Pay equity programs attempt to address the undervaluation for work traditionally or historically done by women. Pay equity (also referred to as “comparable worth”) programs require a gender-neutral analysis of comparative work. A variety of very different jobs are compared based on a composite of the skill, effort and responsibility of a job and the conditions under which the job is generally done. The comparison determines the relative worth of those jobs to the achievement of a firm’s objectives, under the proposition that equal contribution merits equal compensation. Where female-dominated jobs in the workplace are found to be of equal or comparable value to male-dominated jobs but paid below the level of the male jobs or payline, then all employees in those female-dominated jobs are entitled to receive pay equity adjustments.
Blau, F., & Kahn, L. (2007). The Gender Pay Gap: Have Women Gone as far as they can. Academy of Management Perspectives , 21 (1), 7-23.
Ngo, H. Y., Foley, S., Wong, A., & Loi, R. (2003). Who Gets More of the Pie? Predictors of Perceived Gender Inequity at Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 227-241.
Furthermore, Saunders proposes that systems which reward alternative standings unequally can demonstrate that they provide valuable effects e.g. providing individuals with motivation to strive. Although, Saunders doesn’t argue that unequal rewards are the primary method with which society could fill the significant positions with accomplished individuals. Saunders proposed that within society each individual could be equal in their position with regards to economic rewards. However, this concept could present serious problems as some individuals could be displeased within this system if they believe some individuals aren’t dissevering of equal pay. Additionally, others who have previously strived may alter their behaviour and lose their motivation. When developing his own theory of Stratification, Saunders established three different types of equality. The first of the three is Formal or Legal equality which includes all of society being subject to equal laws or rulings. Individuals pass judgement on other based on their behaviour e.g. breaking a law and not based upon who they are as a person. The second of the three is Equality of Opportunity which means that individuals share an equal opportunity to become unequal. Individuals strive for achievement and individuals which possesses better merit achieve more. Merit can be about being an efficient worker or when an individual possesses attributes which are deemed valuable within their society. The third type is Equality of Outcome which is an extension of the idea of Equality of Opportunity. This idea presents each individual should be given equal rewards and effort and ability should not be taken into account (Haralambos and Holborn,
Motivation is therefore the force that transforms and uplifts people to be productive and perform in their jobs. Maximising an employee's motivation is necessary and vital to successfully accomplish the organisation's objectives and targets. However this is a considerable challenge to any organisation's managers, due to the complexity of motivation and the fact that there is no ready made solution or an answer to what motivates people to work well (Mullins, 2002).
In any organization, sometimes, monetary schemes doesnot get people involve to pursue work in a certain way, rather it demoralize and threatens the self-esteem of employees. According to Meyer (1975), “the basis for most of the problems with merit pay plans is that most people think their own performance is above average”. The amount may ...
The first problem Levin tackles is the one of socioeconomic inequalities; simply said, the pay and job position differences between men and women. Levin...
The effective Human Resource Management in an organization requires an exceptional standard set for motivation, job design, reward system and equity. Nowadays, people are more willing to avoid unfair treatment in the workplace than any other aspect. The fundamental concept behind Equity is an attempt to balance what has been put in and taken out at the workplace with a feeling of justice being served. Unconsciously, values are assigned to many various contributions made to the organization, hence causing an air of misbalance in the environment. There has always been a disparity in the view on the desirability or the cost effectiveness of policy measures. The importance of equity or reducing discrimination has gained a lot of attention in the labour market (Milkovich, Newman & Ratnam, 2009).
In daily life, we need motivation to improve our performance in our job or in studies. Motivation is an internal force, dependent on the needs that drive a person to achieve. In the other words, motivation is a consequence of expectations of the future while satisfaction is a consequence of past events (Carr, 2005). We need to give reward to our self when we did correctly or we has achieve our target. Reward is something that we are given because we have behaved well, worked hard, or provided a service to the community. Theories of motivation can be used to explain the behavior and attitude of employees (Rowley, 1996; Weaver, 1998). The theories include content theories, based on assumptions that people have individual needs, which motivate their action. Meanwhile according to Robbins (2001), motivation is a needs-satisfying process, which means that when a person's needs are satisfied by certain factors, the person will exert superior effort toward attaining organizational goals. Schulze and Steyn (2003) affirmed that in order to understand people’s behavior at work, managers or supervisors must be aware of the concept of needs or motives which will help “move” their employees to act.Theories such as Maslow (1954), McClelland (1961), Herzberg (1966) and Alderfer (1969) are renowned for their works in this field. The intrinsic reward or also be known as motivators factors is the part of Herzberg motivation theory. Motivators are involve factors built into the job or the studies itself such as achievement, recognition, responsibility and advancement. Hygiene factors are extrinsic to the job such as interpersonal relationship, salary, supervision and company policy (Herzberg, 1966. There have two factors that are called hygiene fac...
Motivation is the concept of stimulating or arousing a person to achieve a goal. Motivation has much to do with desire and ambition, and if they are absent, motivation is absent too (What is Motivation and How to Strengthen It, para. 1). Motivation theories are unique to each organization. Some organizations have come up with motivation theories such as setting work goals, job performance evaluations, and fair treatment policies within the work environment to keep employees motivated. The impact that individuals, groups and structures have on behavior within organizations is Organizational Behavior. Motivation is affected by organizational behaviors, which is why different organizations apply motivation theories to motivate employees.