Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of gender equality
The essay on equality
Effect of gender equality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of gender equality
Equality has never been something that comes easy to us and usually doesn’t come without a price. Many times, there have been great sacrifices by many in order to achieve one common goal. Whether it be women’s suffrage or the black civil rights movements, it took many people to accomplish what they did. But with all differences aside, people as a whole are still not always equal. Although there have been attempts at creating this type of atmosphere, it seems that there are always just enough bumps in the road to throw everything off course. But what are the advantages to this type of society and how significant are they? Is it worth the same struggles that others have gone through for their causes? Or do the consequences simply outweigh the rewards in establishing this type of community? These are the most basic questions needed to dissect some of the problems that some communist communities have run into. They also challenge us to truly think about what it means to be truly equal.
First of all, the advantages of being equal depend on what you think being equal means. What if everyone were to have every necessity and opportunity? The advantages of this type equivalent way of living are much more obvious than any consequences. If everyone were equal, then no one would be in need. In some ways, poverty would be almost nonexistent. Hunger could be extinguished and education could be available to everyone. And perhaps one of the strongest arguments may be that no one has any sort of power over one another. In the book Divergent, social dysfunction arose when a group of people wanted to establish authority over the rest of the population. And this is not just a theory in another fictitious story. This has been the reason for numerous...
... middle of paper ...
... if your ideas of equivalence drifted to a communist belief, then I would say that there would be many complications with this type of society. It’s sometimes human nature to be a leader, or in some cases, a dictator. I believe that an organized society cannot exist without some form of class rank. So can equality ever be truly reached in this way? But hopefully, we can be equal in the opportunities and rights that we are given.
So is equality worth the consequences and struggles we would pursue to reach it? In some ways it would be, but we would need to keep in mind the dangers that may come in trying. If we could, one day, live in a place where no one is hungry and everyone is sheltered, then we can say that we have grasped a balanced society. But until then, we can only try to provide for everyone, to the best of our ability, in the world that we live in today.
The first standard of equality is ontological equality which is the notion that everyone is created equal at birth. Ontological equality often justifies material inequality. In fact, this type of equality is sometimes used to put forth the notion that poverty is a virtue. A second standard of equality is equality of opportunity meaning that “everyone has an equal chance to achieve wealth, social prestige, and power because the rules of the game, so to speak, are the same for everyone”( Conley, 247). Therefore, any existing inequality is fair as long as everyone plays by the rules. The standard of equality is equality of condition, which is the idea that everyone should have an equal starting point. The last form of equality is equality of outcome which states, everyone should end up with the same outcome regardless of
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living.
...was perfect equality then your choices would not influence your life, because nothing is better than anything else. Life would become shallow and unfulfilling. Humanity needs someone to love and someone to hate.
What would happen to the world if everyone in our society was equal in every aspect? Would this create utopia or hell? In this short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. America has finally achieved full social equality, and living up to the first amendment fully. In this futuristic society, handicaps force this equality, the strong, the beautiful, the intelligent are forced to wear weights, masks, and headphones. These constraints force equality among the American people from beauty and brains, to strength. Harrison is the symbol of defiance and individuality, and represents the aspects of the American people that still want to try hard, out do their peers, and show off their attributes. The story criticizes the policy of equality
An impartial society: Utopia or Hell? What would happen to the world if the people were literally equal in every aspect of their lives? In the futuristic short story, “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., the world is finally living up to America’s first amendment of everyone being created equal. In this society, the gifted, strong, and beautiful are required to wear handicaps of earphones, heavy weights, and hideous masks, respectively. Thus, these constraints leave the world equal from brains to brawn to beauty. With the world constantly pushing for equality among people, Vonnegut reveals a world that society is diligently working toward. Through this foreshadowing of the future, Vonnegut attempts to use Diana Moon Glampers and
Aristotle said, “ The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” True equality is hard to come by when there are so many things that make people so different. The word equality has a very general meaning. That meaning however, can be interpreted in many different ways. To some, the interpretation can lean more towards a sense of freedom. This freedom has been something society has been fighting for throughout the entirety of history. To others, such as author Kurt Vonnegut Jr., it could mean the complete opposite. In Harrison Bergeron, Vonnegut portrays equality as a sort of societal imprisonment.
Though the rewards are pleasing to the ear, the path to obtaining the benefits of communism is a violent one. This strict governing idea was derived from Communist Manifesto, a book written by two German economists, Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels, who declare that many problems in society are caused by the unequal distribution of wealth. These two believe that “Communism deprives no man of the ability to appropriate the fruits of his labour. The only thing it deprives him of is the ability to enslave others by means of such appropriations.” To achieve the goal of happiness and prosperity for all, the lines that distinguish the differences between the rich and poor must be erased. Obviously, the rich will never voluntarily give up their goods or status; therefore the figureheads must force equality among the citizens. Communism places their citizens, whether they be the wealthy or the laborers, into working classes that specify their contribution to the government. With such balanced placement of the people, individuality is impossible for any single person to achieve.
Actions of equalization only makes life worse and more miserable for the people of the victimized society. Uniqueness and individuality is a right
Democracy stresses the equality of all individuals and insists that all men are created equal. Democracy does not persist on an equality of condition for all people or argue that all persons have a right to an equal share of worldly goods. Rather, its concept of equality insists that all are entitled to equality of opportunity and equality before the law. The democratic concept of equality holds that no person should be held back for any such arbitrary reasons as those based on race, color, religion, or gender. This concept of equality holds that each person must be free to develop himself or herself as fully as he or she can or cares to and that each person should be treated as the equal of all other persons by the law. We have come a great distance toward reaching the goal of equality for all in this country, but however close we are we are still at a considerable distance from a genuine universally recognized and respected equality for all. I will go into more details giving more information and making it clear to understand equality and civil rights for all and it affects everyone.
Society is flawed. There are critical imbalances in it that cause much of humanity to suffer. In, the most interesting work from this past half-semester, The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx is reacting to this fact by describing his vision of a perfectly balanced society, a communist society. Simply put, a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other, but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors. Marx is writing of this society because, he believes it to be the best form of society possible. He states that communism creates the correct balance between the needs of the individual and the needs of society. And furthermore thinks that sometimes violence is necessary to reach the state of communism. This paper will reflect upon these two topics: the relationship of the individual and society, and the issue of violence, as each is portrayed in the manifesto.
I think that Equality's primary focus at the end of the book is different than at the beginning. At the beginning Equality is strictly motivated by curiosity "We wished to know. We wished to know about all the things which make the world around us" says Rand on page 22. As he continues to advance in his experiments he realizes that he had discovered something truly amazing. This is something that has never been seen in his community. But in order for him to make this discovery, he had to be selfish and do the work himself in order to be selfless for his brothers. He found pride in being able to make such a great thing by himself but didn't know what that feeling was because he was never taught the words to describe what he was feeling. Later in the book as he continues to find a
Equal work, equal wages, equal food, equal opportunities, equal power. On the outside, a society where every one of its citizens was completely equal sounds and appears like a good thing, even a great thing. No one had too much power, everyone seemed to be happy, and most importantly everyone worked to better the community instead of themselves. This is what Socialism was portrayed as: a system in which everyone worked together to benefit the state. Contradicting this fabricated image, life under Socialism did not succeed in equality for men and women, and it caused people to do whatever necessary in order to gain some sense of individualism. While equality for all people in all aspects of life sounds appealing, it was an unachievable goal
I had never thought about the difference between equal opportunity and equal circumstances. I have always heard everyone talk about equality but, until reading Dr. Deaton’s book I had never thought about the roots of equality. No one has the same set of circumstances but generally to obtain something it must be worked for. I believe that in most cases if one wants equal opportunity, they must create it for themselves. For example, I love sports, everything about them. People come from all sorts of backgrounds and circumstances because they all worked hard enough to create the opportunity to play at a competitive level. To make it to the MLB/ NBA/NFL there is no minimum parent salary or minimum education level, just athletes that outworked their circumstances. However, I think that differences in circumstances can be a main cause for inequalities. For example, my older sister and I went to the same high school where if you want to learn something,
According to Equality 7-2521’s society, the principle of collectivism has overcome more capitalist regimes in the Great Rebirth. Consequently, every facet of society is incorporated into a firm state system. For instance, the school system programmes the children of certain state with the viewpoint that rather than living to satisfy their self desires, they should live entirely for their fellow community members. This philosophy parallels the Soviet use of the term “comrade” to refer to a fellow citizen (Peikoff, 4). This leads to a highly dystopian...
Equality is a concept mankind never is able to grasp correctly. Of course humans will always search for different solutions to create fairness, but factors such as human greed, ignorance of mass populations, and even biological aspects stagnates the process of equality. The oldest and most relevant discussion on equality lies with the difference of sex; man versus woman. Initially, men, because of their physical superiority, were given the prospects many women never even dreamt to have. Conversely, as time has progressed, women have fought this unfair treatment with demands of suffrage and similar rights to those of their male equivalents. Greatly enough, this generation has done an exceptional job in the challenge of overcoming sexism and inequality. However, will this search for equality ever end? When can we say we have created an equal race of men and women? The fact of the matter is that it is truly impossible to have equality between the sexes because of predisposed circumstances that are not easily controllable in the slightest bit.