The laws on equal employment opportunity are designed to provide all workers fair consideration based on their job performance and not on any personal factors such as race, religion, gender, disability or genetic information. These laws have been enacted as extensions of the 14th Amendment and guarantees due process and equal protection against discrimination in the workforce. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces these laws ensuring that contractual commitments and Federal laws bind the employers in keeping their employment application processes within reasonable consideration of an applicant's background. Compliance with the standards of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and its amendments is expected from the employers and in this given case study, from the Gelato Cheese Company.
The passage of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 provided the EEOC the authority to regulate the Title VII compliance of employers with fifteen or more employees. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides protection against employment discrimination and prohibits employment discrimination of an individual “because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin” (Section 703a, 1964). Gelato Cheese Company has one hundred workers with 75% of the workforce of white population who has completed high school against the 25 per cent from the minority groups and this information is important in considering Gelato’s is non-compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Gelato’s requirement for the employment of its cleaning crew is for high school diploma holders, and obviously with the...
... middle of paper ...
...ifications are not disadvantaging people at different ages. Gelato must be able to justify the need for specific qualifications objectively with considerations on equivalent or similar level alternative qualifications. Gelato must always consider disparate treatment and its prohibition in the employment of individuals taking note of disparate treatment as a situation when a person is treated differently from others; and such treatment is intentional and based on any of the protected factors. The concept of adverse impact must also be considered as it may be unintentional and may apply to a protected group instead of an individual. The individuals from the minority groups are most often disregarded even with their mental or physical capabilities and are at the disadvantage of attaining a job as they are not part of the society’s dominating large white networks.
David Dunlap, a 52-year old African American male with 25 year boilermaker experience, 15 years of which include foreman experience, brought suit under Title VII, alleging racial discrimination by the TVA after being looked over after interviewing for positions within the TVA. The district court agreed that “Dunlap had been subjected to discrimination under both disparate treatment and disparate impact analyses, concluding that TVA’s subjective hiring processes permitted racial bias against both Dunlap and other black applicants” (Walsh, 2010). The case was heard by the 6th District Court of Appeals and that court “affirmed the disparate treatment claim, reversed the disparate impact claim, and affirmed the district court’s award of damages and fees to Mr. Dunlap” (Walsh, ...
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the single most important piece of legislation that has helped to shape and define employment law rights in this country (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001)". Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, gender, disability, religion and national origin. However, it was racial discrimination that was the moving force of the law that created a whirlwind of a variety of discriminations to be amended into Title VII. Title VII was a striving section of legislation, an effort which had never been tried which made the passage of the law an extremely uneasy task. This paper will discuss the evolution of Title VII as well as the impact Title VII has had in the workforce.
Equal Employment is giving the same employment opportunity to everyone without bias or discrimination because of race, religion, color or gender. Because of the importance of managing the practice of the federal government has established a Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). This agency along with some others are responsible for ensuring organization abide by the law. What happens with the gray areas that organizations can finagle its way. In the case study of Cracker Barrel the gray area was found in the hiring of homosexuals. The homosexuals did not have a law that protect them from such discrimination, but that does not make it right.
one of the points in the act is ‘An employee asked to work on a Sunday
In order for John to file a discrimination complaint against his employer, he is required to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint counselor or representative of the company. Once the charge has been filed, an investigation is made, or the charge maybe selected to an EEOC program and maybe dismissed. In this case, John is given a certain number of days to file a lawsuit on his behalf. This process would have to go through several lengthy stages such as the EEOC administrative process. If gone to trial it must go through filing of a summons, response and answer, discovery process, enlisting of experts, pre-trial, actual trial and a possible appeal.
The idea that is being presented is that discrimination is taking a role in analyzing a person’s work ethic and educational background. This unfair descriptive process was and still is causing issues with native employment.
Discrimination should be avoided at all costs if for no other reason than it is against the law. It is expressly forbidden because of the problems it has caused for certain groups. However, forbidding it was not enough and laws were passed to counteract its effects. But the legislative approach was unable to achieve acceptance and inclusion; it could not create and/or maintain an environment that appreciated each person and treated him or her with dignity and respect. The eradication of discrimination requires more than legal compliance. It goes beyond mere placement of individuals. An inclusive environment brings out the best in everyone and enhances life’s experiences.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission mission is to enforce federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against anyone applying for employment opportunities. Discrimination will be leading to major problems in the next few years, which could cause poverty, violence, and crime. Discrimination cases are having large payouts, but the cases being are not decreasing in large amounts. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is not living up to its mission because the discrimination cases being filed are increasing in the 21st century.
The first significant equality legislation in the UK was the Equal Pay Act 1970 . However, the issue of equal pay in the workplace can be traced back to the 19th century. This essay will analyse how economic and social factors of the 19th and 20th century were the reasons for highlighting the issue of equal pay in the workplace. However, with the gender pay gap standing at 19.2 per cent in 2015 , there can be no defining reason for equal pay in the workplace. Consequently, this essay will then discuss how equality legislation has challenged unequal pay in the workplace, but in its reactive approach has failed its objective. Furthermore, this essay will then discuss the remedies for equal pay in the workplace by analysing the impact on both
In management, the activities in which managers engage, to attract and to retain employees and to ensure that they perform at a high level of competence and contribute to the accomplishment of organizational goals are part of what make up an organization's Human Resources Management system. In addition, to the complexity of Human Resources Management, increases local, state and national laws and regulations by which managers and organizations must abide. It is called Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), which ensures that citizens have an equal opportunity to obtain employment regardless of their gender, race, and country of origin, religion or disabilities. One of the major Equal Employment Opportunity Laws affecting HRM is the Equal Pay Act. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act that forbids gender-based pay discrimination of those performing substantially equal work for the...
Equal Employment Opportunity means freedom from discrimination on the basis of sex, religion, color, national origin, disability and age. Affirmative Action plans define an employer’s standard for proactively, recruiting, hiring, and promoting women, minorities, disabled individuals and veterans (SHRM, 2012). EEO, Affirmative Action: Equal Employment Opportunity is to ensure employee’s performance is high and the overall goals of the organization are being met. Affirmative Action and EEO are regulations that help ensure fair actions and opportunities are given in the workplace. Employees who receive equal employment opportunities are much more focused in the workplace, which is geared toward achieving the goals of the organization. Embracing
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and various other federal and state laws prohibit intentional discrimination based on ancestry or ethnicity. Some employers practice blatant forms of minority discrimination by paying lower salaries and other compensation to blacks and Hispanics. Others engage in quota systems by denying promotions and jobs to individuals on the basis of race or color. Federal laws prohibit employers of 15 or more employees from discriminating on the basis of race or color. Virtually all states have even stronger anti-discrimination laws directed to fighting job-related race and minority discrimination. In some states, companies with fewer than eight employees can be found guilty of discrimination.
One problem that Americans are facing is the inequality between men and women, whether it is in everyday life or in a professional atmosphere. One step that has been taken toward equality was introduced with the Equal Pay Act of 1963, signed by President John F. Kennedy. This law was the first affecting the amount of job opportunities available for women and allowing them to work in traditionally male dominated fields. On the outside, this would sound like a solution where nothing could possibly go wrong, but it is not.
The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a federal agency that administers and enforces civil rights for job applicants. This federal agency enforces federal laws, responsible for workplace discrimination and they investigate discrimination complains based on person’s race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin age (40 or older), disability or genetic information (EEOC, 2017) It is also illegal to discriminate against a person who complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination or was a participant in an employment discrimination or lawsuit. Most companies that employ at least 15 employees are covered by the Equal Employment Opportunity
What exactly is workplace discrimination? (Statistic) It can be defined as a less favorable treatment towards an individual or a group of individuals at work, usually based on their nationality, skin color, sex, marital status, age, sexual orientation, or other defining attributes. It can appear as a denial of certain rights, negligent treatment, deliberate harassment or work results and achievements, and so on. A person can be discriminated by their coworkers or by the employer. Thesis: Gender inequality in the workplace is an ethically historic and significant issue which requires adequate solutions because it leads to unethical discrimination of women, minorities, and those who are members of the LGBT community. As a rule, discrimination