Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments against entitlement theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments against entitlement theory
“I want an Oompa Loompa now” said Violet in the 1971 classic Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. This is entitlement, “the feeling or belief that you deserve to be given something (such as special privileges)” Violet did nothing to deserve the Oompa Loompa yet because her daddy has an endless checkbook she feels entitled. There are a few other meanings to this word, the right to guaranteed benefits; the fact of having a right to something. Depending on political views, how someone is raised or simply their outlook on life, they may view the word entitlement differently.
I will be be talking about the ways different people view entitlement, The Entitlement Age, and some examples of small scale of entitlement. This will give you an overview of the word entitlement and it’s meaning in America.
I asked several people close to me what they thought of when they hear the word entitlement, each one had brought up different way of looking at it. My brother who is prior military said “it is something earned through service.” My dad had a more political view and thought of Welfare, Food stamps, Social Security and other government programs. A friend thought of her brother because he felt he was entitled to an inheritance since he was the oldest of the children. My mom thought of celebrities and wealthily people because the expect certain things do to their status.
One question is, are these things entitlements, rights, privileges, or benefits. I believe that these are all entitlements but the word that confuses people is the word “right”. Rights are entitlements and entitlements are rights. If you have the right to bear arms you can own a gun, you are entitled by the law to have something. Where entitlement starts to sound derogator...
... middle of paper ...
...rich and famous, they stole jewelry, articles of clothing, money.
Each of these entitlements laziness spoiled, dependent, and impulsive can be seen in every level of economic status across the United Sates.
How did we get such an over inflated sense of work entitlement? Generation Y also know as The Entitlement Age (those born between 1980 and 1999). In the Journal of Business & Economics Research – April, 2009 they describe Generation Y as technologically savvy but seem to lack interpersonal skills.Tend to lack patience and whatever is wanted, should occur now; also the why me attitude. Often it is blamed on the parents of these children for giving them things without working for it, telling them they were special, and not instilling the ethic of hard work. It is my hope that further generations will re-kindle the dormant american sprit of the can do attitude.
Growing up in The United States, people are given this idea of an American Dream. Almost every child is raised to believe they can become and do anything they want to do, if one works hard enough. However, a majority of people believe that there is a separation of class in American society. Gregory Mantsios author of “Class in America-2009” believes that Americans do not exchange thoughts about class division, although most of people are placed in their own set cluster of wealth. Also political officials are trying to get followers by trying to try to appeal to the bulk of the population, or the middle class, in order to get more supporters. An interesting myth that Mantsios makes in his essay is how Americans don’t have equal opportunities.
Peculiar means odd, strange or unusual. So how could benefits be peculiar? It’s how we as people make it to be, as Roxane Gay emphasizes in her article “Peculiar Benefits,” published in 2012. Roxane Gay argues how we must move past the dispute as to why we must recognize privilege to get past societal problems and to not allow its meaning to continue to become diluted. Gay builds a strong argument mainly through audience adaptation, language and her choice of rhetoric was effective enough to affect my perception on her point of view.
The entitlement people believe to have is a result of the promises America has made. In Class I n America by Gregory Mantsios writes, “The united states is fundamentally a classless society. Class distinctions are largely irrelevant today…” he is stating that people in America have adapted to believe that differences in classes don’t exist anymore because all Americans are equal when living in America because we have advanced as a nation and no longer believe old ways. He also writes, “Everyone has an equal chance to succeed. Success in the united states requires no more than hard work, sacrifice and perseverance.” This statement displays that America has entitled people to equal opportunity and they don’t have to worry as long as they try their best. As result, the people of America have chosen to in trust America that their dreams will be met because they are entitled to the promise of the land and the promise of the
Although most Americans continue to believe working hard is the most important element for getting ahead, they no longer believe that it guarantees success (Hanson 2010: 570). "Lack of thrift, effort, ability, motivation, and self-control are the most popular explanations for poverty among Americans. Thus, inequality is justified and the Dream can stay alive in the context of one of the wealthiest nations with one of the greatest wealth divides" (Hanson 2010: 571). Instead of one undifferentiated American dream to collectively strive towards, there are several interpretations which pertain to differing social locations. This is because of the inequalities of advantages and disadvantages across generations produced by cumulative institutional processes and an unfair opportunity structure (Pallas 2008:
“A Generation of Slackers? Not So Much” written by Catherine Rampell is an informative article about today’s millennial generation after high school. It provides the reader with a deeper look into young people’s work ethic, or what some to think to be, lack-there-of. The author does a fantastic job using research, credible resources, and statistics to support her belief that Generation Y (children born in the 1980s and 1990s) is no less productive than previous generations. I will admit that before reading this piece, I was one of those who believed that Millennials were in fact the “coddled, disrespectful and narcissistic generation” (Rampell, 2011, para 3). After reading this article, my opinion has changed. It has touched on issues
Throughout the existence of man debates over property and inequality have always existed. Man has been trying to reach the perfect state of society for as long as they have existed. John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Martin Luther King are three great examples of men who broke down the basics of how property and inequality are related. Each historical figure has their own distinct view on the situation. Some views are similar while others vary greatly. These philosophers and seekers of peace and equality make many great arguments as to how equality and property can impact man and society. Equality and property go hand in hand in creating an equal society. Each authors opinion has its own factors that create a mindset to support that opinion. In this paper we will discuss the writings of John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Martin Luther King Jr. and the factors that influenced their opinions on inequality and property.
Privileges are things that a person receives that gives them an advantage over most people (Merriam-Webster). These are benefits that only certain people receive for being in a certain group or discourse. Peggy McIntosh, director of the Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, wrote “White Privilege and Male Privilege” and states “I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privileges, as males are taught not to recognize male privilege” (605). She argues that whites and males receive certain privileges, yet they do not even notice them. This shows that different races and women are still put at a disadvantage, but the people who receive the benefits are blind to the problem.
birth right for citizens born in this country. This right is taken for granted by many and is
Nozick introduces his theory by calling a “minimal state” (Nozick 149) the only justifiable state that does not infringe on the rights of the people living in this state. Nozick as a libertarian, believes in the freedom of the individual over all else., Nozick says, “There is no one natural dimension or weighted sum or combination of a small number of natural dimensions that yields the distributions generated in accordance with the principle of entitlement”(Nozick 157). The patterns, upon which certain sections argue for the distribution of wealth, such as poverty etc., do not impress Nozick at all. Continuing the belief of individual freedom over all else, Nozick then presents his entitlement theory, which advocates that all of one’s possessions sho...
Parker, Star. "Se Habla Entitlement." The Longman Reader for English 101. Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 566-568.
Roemer, John E. (1996), ‘Equality of Welfare versus Equality of Resources’ in Theories of Distributive Justice, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 236-261.
Nation the right to boast of fairness and justice being served without conflicting with personal
ABSTRACT: Philosopher Matthew Lipman, in Social Inquiry, says that there are instances in which 'what one deserves may be specified fairly readily. A sick child deserves medicine, a hungry child deserves food, children deserve an education...' This seems to imply that these are cases in which what one deserves is clear-cut, and only when 'the cases become more complicated' does it become 'progressively more difficult' to determine desert. I would submit that these cases are not nearly so cut-and-dry, in terms of determining desert, as one might imagine. Is it really correct to say that a sick child deserves medicine? Who is to say? Who is to be the ultimate arbiter? Is there some sort of authority or power (higher or otherwise) who is looked to in order to make such a determination (or who is looked to in order to justify making such an assertion in the first place)? Is desert to be determined based on need? On abundance of what is deserved? On legal entitlements? This paper will address just such questions.
In this paper, I will examine Nozick’s ‘whatever arises from a just situation by just steps is itself just’ formula. By this formula, Nozick protects individuals’ absolute property rights. To examine its validity, first, I will show that Nozick’s entitlement theory relies on Kantian principle, which demands treating everyone as persons having individual rights with dignity. However, it will be clear that Kantian theory does not necessarily yield the concept of absolute property rights. Second, I will explain the principle of self-ownership, which will clarify that persons have rights over their bodies and powers. I will find the principle of self-ownership is compatible with Kantian principle. Third, I will examine Nozick’s proviso, which guides legitimate initial acquisition. However, finally, I will show that the appropriation that passes Nozick’s proviso violates the idea of respecting people as persons with dignity. In other words, Nozick’s proviso is inconsistent with Kantian principle. Therefore, Nozick’s formula fails.
Social stratification is a system that societies use to rank members into organized and functioning groups. The way that the United States stratifies its members is by a class system. Upper, middle, and lower class are determined by the amount of money individuals have available to them for spending. Social class in America is a huge determinant of an individual’s quality of life. Education and training, or better yet the access to these, are what governs the amount of opportunity an individual has to make money and move up in social class. Often, social class can predetermine one’s fate before he or she has the chance to. Ambition means little when “class-based discrimination