Enforcement Accountability In Counseling

Overall management of the counseling process must be accompanied by enforcement accountability. This is because accountability has a very important role in guidance and counseling services in schools (Gysbers, 1995; Gysbers & Handerson, 2006). Cobia and Handerson (2007) explains that accountability is a counselor attempt to demonstrate to users and stakeholders about what they have done to improve the academic success of students. Enforcement of accountability can only be done if the counselor implement evaluation of counseling programs that have been implemented (Cobia & Handerson, 2003; Sink, 2009). Based on the evaluation, the counselor can assess the effectiveness of counseling programs that have been implemented. Furthermore, the results of these evaluations presented to the public as a form of accountability (accountability). Accountability is important because counselors have used various resources of the community to carry out their profession, such funds.

However, in practice counseling services in senior high school, evaluation and accountability to the counseling program is still much that is not done properly. Still growing public perception of

Counseling program made counselors tend to be created once and used for several years. The use of the counseling program is evaluated repeatedly without shortcomings and their relevance to the needs of students. In line with this, the results of research and Sunawan Sugiyo (2012) found that all counselors (100%) and principals stated that the evaluation of guidance and counseling services were essential for program improvement (40.90%) and increased performance counselor (27.27 %). However, not all counselors carry out the evaluation of guidance and counseling services (18.18%), while the rest carry out an evaluation with regular / periodic (59.09%) and non-routine