Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Concept of Mind
The Concept of Mind
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Concept of Mind
Is there an enduring self? My answer to this question would be yes. It is my belief that the enduring self is our mind or brain. No matter the location of a mind, or how its state may become degraded, the mind is still itself in essence, and it is the culmination of who we are and our body is the vessel by which we express the enduring self.
In Dennett’s piece, Where Am I, he ponders who he is and arrives at the answer that he is wherever he thinks that he is. With this answer, after a mishap separates his connection between his brain and his body, he believes that he, at some point has merely become a brain in a vat. Once his connection is lost with his body, he perceives that he is now only his brain, which is currently floating in a vat. As he thinks that this is where he is, his perceptions follow. I believe that at this point we reach the
…show more content…
The counter argument would be that if the mind is the collection of memories that makes our personality who we are then we aren’t ourselves when we can’t recall these memories. My response to that is that whether we adapt in a positive way, or through deterioration, our mind is still the same mind, just in an altered state. For instance, if I crashed my car, the appearance may be different but the scraps of metal that remain are still my car, just in a different state. If I have a glass and it falls of a table and shatters, it is still a glass. Now the glass is just broken. No matter the state, or degradation that occurs, our mind is still our mind, in any and every state of change. As individuals claim to grow and change continually, this occurs simultaneously and as a result of the changes that take place within the mind. Without the brain sending signals and impulses and directing hormonal changes, none of the changes that we see resulting in our physical body or vessel would
To formulate and express the contents of this reduced awareness, man has invented and endlessly elaborated those symbol-systems and implicit philosophies which we call languages” (Huxley 6). So if Dennett occupies a physical manifestation it is because it is in his nature. The flash to Houston happened fast enough that it took Dennetts point of awareness a little while to even realize that he was physically there. This lag is not to be noted as an absolute difference between consciousness and circumstance but rather as an indirect bearing of that point of view on its personal location. The connection to the outer world is made by that which is a medium to reveal it.
Here is a brief summary of the argument of persisting persons. Parfit, with the help of the work of David Hume, believes that there is no enduring self. That is to say, that the person I am when I was born of the mother’s womb is not the person I am today, and the person I am today is not the same person ten years, ten days or perhaps ten minutes from now. Parfit argues for a perduring self. People are able to persist through time through overlapping psychological mental states. This is similar to Hume’s Bundle Theory, which argues that the self is made up of a bundle of overlapping experiences, conscious events, rather than a central person. When Parfit talks of persistence, what he means by persistence is these ongoing psychological states. For people seeking answers about the big life and death questions about identity, Parfit does not provide any answers here. In fact, he wants people to get over the idea of identity through time because it assumes that there is a right answer concerning identity. Essentially, it is a waste of time to worry if you are going to be the same person or not.
if you removed the brain form the body that all the tendencies would remain. This did
Daniel named his brain separately from the rest of his body. His brain in referred to as “Yorick” and his body is “Hamlet” and he himself is “Dennett”. Daniel was having a hard time grasping that if his brain, Yorick, was in the vat and his body, hamlet, was down the hall in the patient room, or wherever, then where was Dennett really at? He came up with some principles that could explain and possibly answer this question. The first principle was, “Where Hamlet goes there goes Dennett” in which he states that “it was clear enough, then, that my current body and I could part company, but not likely that I could be separated from my brain” (Dennett, 3). With this principle he then thought that maybe perhaps the truth was actually the second principle which was, “Where Yorick goes there goes Dennett”. The second principle states that in such an example if Dennett were to rob a bank in California and Yorick, his brain, was in Texas then where would the crime case take place and what kind of charge would come from it, “who” would go where for the punishment of the crime. If this principle were to be true then that leads to a third principle; “Dennett is wherever he thinks he is”. This third point of view states that “ at any given time a person has a point of view and the location of the point of view (which is determined internally by the content of the point of view) is also the location of the
My philosophy of success, is me growing into the person I want to become and being comfortable with the choices I decide to make in life. Success is not something I can achieve overnight, it’s something I must plan for then proceed to working hard for it as well. Without hard work, there isn’t anything successful about the job I want to get done or the job I wish to get done. Doing anything without hard work and dedication, and expecting the best outcome is not success; it’s mediocrity. Being mediocre/ will only allow me or anyone else to have a ‘Victim’s Mindset.’
Daniel Dennett’s essay “Where Am I?” tries to argue against dualism. In this essay, Dennett tackles the difference between mind, body, and a person’s identity. Dennett’s views seem to be of empirical monism. In his story, Dennett has his brain removed and preserved in a vat. His body stays alive, and radio transmitters make it so he can still function. Dennett starts to question who “he” is and where he is.
In most cases of life, it would be safe to assume that our brains are attached to our bodies and thus we often are not forced to distinguish between the location of our brain and location of our body. Dennett, however, begins his story by describing a procedure that
helps us to behave within society rules. With that being said I believe it encourages people to have a sense of moral beliefs along with guidance. Which leads me to have faith that people are capable of separating there right from wrongs. Making themselves aware and in control of their own futures. For instants when I am faced with a difficult situation I know that it is up to me to make the choice not only to benefit myself, but to be concerned of those around me as well. It also ties in with the way we act, this is known as behaviorism the claim on minds and/or mental events in which they can be expressed in terms of behaviors (“Ontology”) studied by
The self is fictional and we are only impressions (Hume, 134). When those impressions are removed, the person does not exist anymore. When one object changes over time, if the change is gradual we are inclined to consider that object to be the same even though they are not. If a person begins to gradually forget things and show signs of any type of dementia, would we consider that person to be the same person? Or if suddenly that person begins to show symptoms such as forgetting to do every day activities, would we consider them to be the same person?
Erik Erikson composed a theory of psychological development that was composed of eight stages. Erikson’s theory focuses on how personalities evolve throughout life as a result of the interaction between biologically based maturation and the demands of society. According to Erikson, “Each stage of human development presents its characteristic crises. Coping well with each crisis makes an individual better prepared to cope with the next.” (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2013, p. 314) According to Erikson’s eight stages of development, I have only been through six of the eight stages.
Enduring VS Enjoying I believe there is more to life than surviving. (pause a second) Survival can have many meanings. One (pause 1) being not dying.. Dur.
A self is some sort of inner being or principle, essential to, but not identical with, the person as whole. It is that in a person that thinks and feels. The self is usually conceived in philosophy as that which one refer to with the word “I”. It is that part or aspects of a person that accounts for personal identity through time. In spite of all the ways one can change with time, the self is invariably same through time. A self is what is supposed to account for the fact that an individual is same person today as he/she was at the age of five, given that all his characteristics have changed over time. For instance, compared to his childhood, this individual is stronger, taller, and smarter; he has different aspirations and dreams, different thoughts and fears, his interests and activities are remarkably different. Yet, he is still the same ...
For the purpose of this paper I will be describing a personal life experience and I will be applying concepts from the texts to best describe the event. I was born here in the United States (US) but, I was raised in the Dominican Republic (DR). I lived in the DR basically my entire life, I would only come to the US for vacation during summer. It was not until I turned 12 that I decided to move back to the US to continue my studies and learn the language. So I did, I moved with my uncle and his wife on the summer of 2009. At the time, they resided in the Mayfair area of Philadelphia, PA. My uncle and his wife arranged everything for school and as of August of that year I was officially enrolled in Abraham Lincoln High School. Everything was
My primary personal thinking style is the Achievement Style, which is one of the constructive styles. Constructive Styles pertain to self-enhancing behaviors in ways of thinking, which determine a person’s level of satisfaction. These styles also pertain to the capability of effectively working with people, building healthy relationships, and being proficient at the accomplishment of tasks.
People all around the world go through miscellaneous experiences in their lives. Every situation can affect a person in any type of way. The resulting effect does not always need be dissatisfactory; sometimes is a combination or both good and bad. Many aspects in my life have influenced my personality and how I live my life. Getting bullied in middle school has affected my life intensely, however managed to make me stand for myself, a stronger person, and not scared of what anyone says about me.