Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of employee motivation on performance
Impact of employee motivation on performance
Impact of employee motivation on performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of employee motivation on performance
Performance reviews are designed to both evaluate general performance and measure progress around specific goals. Both negative and positive aspects are incorporated in these reviews as they should serve as a point of reference to both look back in evaluation and ahead in anticipation. Pulling back from daily demands in order to assess and review employee performance allows managers to focus their attention on specific departments and clarify what is high priority to their company. Performance reviews also act as an opportunity to acknowledge working staff and identify professional development which will further support the staff members’ career growth. Reviews are seen as a powerful tool that can be tied to a company’s overall success; they serve to align staff with the organization’s expectations and priorities.
Positive aspects of performance reviews include three main objectives: profitability, improving the working relationship between employee and supervisor, and increasing employee satisfaction. Performance reviews allow the company and its employees to set mutual goals; the reviewer and employee function as equals. Review meetings are prepared as a way to tell the other worker what he or she could do to increase productivity. The key to employee productivity is participatory management and seeking genuine input from employees; workers should have the room to determine and voice their needs. Review meetings allow time to focus on skills that are the most important to an employee’s job as it is critical that the worker and reviewer agree on the relative importance of the position. Emphasizing an employee’s strengths are also an added benefit of performance reviews; if recognition of one’s accomplishments and strengths a...
... middle of paper ...
...dated although typically participants are only asked to agree or disagree with descriptive statements regarding one’s work habits and managerial skills.
Performance reviews are a part of career development; they act as a regular appraisal of an employee’s tendencies in a company. The aims of reviews are to not only give feedback on performance but also to facilitate communication between workers and executives. Reviews as a whole are beneficial as they identify employee training needs and provide an opportunity for individual growth and change. In addition, performance reviews allow the employee to discuss their own perception of their performance, in addition to, their boss’. Performance reviews allow one to receive feedback both personally and career-wise, as generally employee’s tend to like to know how they’re doing overall; appraisals help improve the future.
McClish, Mark. “Susan Smith” http://www.statementanalysis.com/susan-smith/ Advanced Interviewing Concepts. May 6, 2002. Web, Feb. 7, 2012
Many nursing experts believe that evaluation is the most crucial part of employee development. Debate the pros and cons of this statement and decide whether the statement is true. If it is not true, then what constitutes the most important part of employee development?
The innovative approach to employee reviews provided by Martinez creates a positive way to evaluate employees’ strengths and weaknesses. The process promotes open conversations, enhanced by the Socratic Method, to generate enthusiasm in both the manager and the subordinate. The fear of negative reactions becomes almost nonexistent because of the collaborative dialogue. Martinez successfully created a performance evaluation system that takes the dread out of employee evaluations.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
Eliciting the information using ‘when, what, where, how, and why’ questions to judge how to respond to the criticism.
Finally, the timing of appraisals could be rectified by implementing quarterly performance appraisal instead of annual ones. Having managers meet with employees more frequently may enhance individual performance by giving employees the feedback they need to improve. Also, increased appraisal may result in more accurate evaluations because it is easier to recall specific performance indicators after 3 months versus after 12
Most recently, this leader took a personality survey which was administered by Culture Index Inc. Culture Index is a hiring and managing process that helps identify top-tier talent, motivate and manage new talent, and match resources with long-term organizational goals (Culture Index, 2016). Culture Index measure four areas of construct which include A=Autonomy, B=Social Ability, C=Pace, and D=Conformity. The results come out in a graph like report and where ever the graph is on each of the construct determines if the individual is high in these areas or low in these areas.
Finally carrying out credibility checks on the categories that were formed was carried out by re-examining interview segments, obtaining key quotes to support their
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
Closed question interviews are questions that involve partakers to choose or select a number of responses that are determined by the interviewer. There are extensive selections of different types of closed interview questions. For an example, a person may choose multiple choice, check boxes, drop down, semantic differential, scale ranking and many more (Penwarden 1). These questions are normally used for confirmatory research to test hypothesis (Royce 182). Therefore, using this methodology is very useful, easy, reliable, and only require a little amount of skill to perform.
Based on your view of the objectives of performance evaluation, evaluate the perspectives about performance appraisal presented by the managers.
The manager communicates with the members of staff individually on a regular basis providing all the necessary information about the employee’s overall performance as it relates to their roles in the workplace. This performance appraisal is beneficial to employees as it allows them to create an outline for their goals with the greatest effort it should not be used to lower the employee’s level of motivation but seek to increase it.
There are several reasons organizations initiate performance evaluations, however the standard purpose for performance evaluations is to discuss performance expectations; not only from the employers perspective but to engage in a formal collaboration where the employee and the manager are both able to provide feedback in a formal discourse. There are many different processes an organization should follow when developing its performance evaluation tool; in addition essential characteristics that must accompany an effective performance appraisal process. I will discuss in detail the intent of a performance evaluation, the process an organization should follow in using its performance evaluation tool, along with the characteristics of an effective
...organizational annual pay and grading reviews, Performance appraisals generally review each individual's performance against objectives and standards for the trading year, agreed at the previous appraisal meeting. Performance appraisals are also essential for career and succession planning - for individuals, crucial jobs, and for the organization as a whole. Performance appraisals are important for staff motivation, attitude and behavior development, communicating and aligning individual and organizational aims, and fostering positive relationships between management and staff. Performance appraisals provide a formal, recorded, regular review of an individual's performance, and a plan for future development.