Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emile Durkheim essay about suicide
Emile Durkheim essay about suicide
Durkheim's study of suicide rates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emile Durkheim essay about suicide
This essay will assess the book of Emile Durkheim's study suicide, using reference to Durkheim's theory a conclusion will be provided of my considerations towards the study that is so widely regarded by sociologists and criminologists as a 'classic' study. Emile Durkheim was born in Epinal the French province of Lorraine on April 15th 1858. 'Durkheim was the first French academic sociologist' and 'his life was dominated throughout by his academic career' (Coser, 2013). Durkheim's career mainly consisted of four main works, with three of them being conducted in the 1890s. Durkheim's study Le suicide was first published in 1897, his aim was to express how 'action can be shaped by society' rather than 'exclusively on individual factors thus belonging …show more content…
Durkheim's work was usually conducted by using two main approaches, positivist and functionalist. He decided to conduct a study on suicide because Sociology was a new and controversial field in the late 19th century, and he wanted to prove that Sociology could exist as a science 'he himself must establish the groups he wishes to study in order to give them the homogeneity and the specific meaning necessary for them to be susceptible of scientific treatment' (Durkheim, 1897). Durkheim chose the topic of suicide because there was an increasing number of suicide statistics within Europe in the late 19th century, 1840 in particular, this was because suicide was not recorded before then. By studying this topic he could investigate the social influences that led people to suicide, this meant Durkheim could conduct a scientific investigation that detailed why suicide was not thoroughly categorised as a psychological matter but also a sociological one 'Since suicide is an individual action affecting the individual only, it must seemingly depend exclusively on individual factors, thus belonging to psychology alone. Is not suicides resolve usually explained by his temperament, character, antecedents and private history?' (Durkheim,
In Durkheim’s concept of social/moral regulation, society imposes limits on humans to regulate their passions, desires, expectations, ambitions and roles. When these limits or social regulations break down, the controlling authority the society once had no longer functions and people are left on their own to make their own plans. In societies that have low levels of social regulations, a state of Anomie, or normlessness, can occur and affect the whole society or just some of its groups. Anomic suicide was more prevalent in this type of society. Anomic suicide basically involve...
According to Emile Durkheim, the inconsistent legal and social norms regarding the killing of someone in insurmountable pain has given birth to anomies, which refers to a “lack of social regulation in which the unrestricted appetites of the individual conscience are no longer held in check…” (White and Haines2004). While Latimer’s direct motives for killing his daughter revolved around her pain, short life expectancy, and limited sources of joy in life, and horrific surgeries, the lack of a collective moral direction towards euthanasia served to legitimize Latimer’s act against the criminal code, in that his plan was well thought out over a long period of time and enabled him to feel wholly confident and unremorseful about this criminalized act. For instance, Latimer planned days in advance to euthanize Tracy while the rest of his family was at church, following which he had to wait an hour in his garage for the carbon monoxide poisoning to fully work, actions which indicate “his lack of remorse…the significant degree of planning and T’s extreme vulnerability” (Supreme Court Judgements 2001). Durkheim’s theory of sociological positivism plays a very big role in Latimer’s crime, as the legal
According to Durkheim, two types of suicide arise from the different levels social integration. One cause of suicide is extremely low social integration, which is referred to as egoistic suicide. Durkheim argues that this is the case because others give the individual’s life meaning, so without this support from the group the person may feel hopeless (Conley 188). The other type of suicide, altruistic suicide, reflects the opposite situation: when an individual is too socially integrated (Conley 189). This type of suicide occurs when members of a group or community become so totally engrossed by the group tha...
Sullivan, E. J. (2004). Becoming influential: A guide for nurses. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
In a study released by Brown University, their psychology department shed some light on common myths and facts surrounded suicide. These m...
In 1897, Emile Durkheim (1997) showed that the suicide – perhaps the most personal of all decisions – could be analysed through the conceptual lenses of sociology.
Some flaws exist in Durkheim’s thought. One minor flaw is that Durkheim failed to collect his own data, using outside sources collected by others. Furthermore, Durkheim has been criticized for his failure to take individual into account properly. This can be seen in a flaw in his legendary sociological work, Suicide. Many have criticized Durkheim for trying to explain micro events using macro statistics; however, Van Poppel and Day (1996) state that this isn’t a fallacy, but rather an empirical mistake as how suicides were described by Protestants and Catholics were described differently, which Durkheim failed to account
When Durkheim conducted his research on suicide he did it with the intention of establishing Sociology as a science and as a result almost validate the worth and power of sociology. Before Durkheim’s study, suicide was considered only as the act of an individual however Durkheim’s theory was that suicide tied in with social structures and even though he believed that suicide is ‘the most personal act anyone can undertake’ (Durkheim, 1897), he also believed it was accredited to social causes.
A Study of Suicide: An overview of the famous work by Emile Durkheim, Ashley Crossman, 2009, http://sociology.about.com/od/Works/a/Suicide.htm, 25/12/2013
... the evidence changed in his later works). He has been widely criticised for his use of official statistics, which are open to interpretation and subject to possibly systematic misreporting, and therefore may not represent the true pattern or rates of suicide. It is also argued that he was confused between the distinction between egoism and anomie, and that he failed to substantiate his claims of the existence of altruism and fatalism; this is argued to such an extent that it has even been suggested that there is only one cause of suicide (egoism) that Durkheim could claim to be true. However, whilst acknowledging some of Durkheim’s own contradictions or confusions, some sociologists have gone on to develop and substantiate the ideas that he developed, and there is no denying that his study of suicide is a far-reaching and legacy-building work of substantial value.
puts it: “…though death alone can put a full period to his misery, he dare not…a vain fear left he offend his Maker” (On Suicide, p.55). On his famous paper “On Suicide”, he defends the act of suicide and concludes that suicide is at least sometimes permissible. This paper will examine the essay itself in depth and counter argues about his view since the commitment of suicide deprives us from the future possibilities.
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. (J. A. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.)
Although sociologists like J.D. Douglas would question the reliability of the statistics, due to the coroners decision being final, most sociologists would agree that Durkheim's study into suicide was successful, and indeed many have tried to develop and improve on his theory. Overall, this essay has shown that one type of methodology may not always be suitable for the particular research carried out. Both Interpretative sociology and the Positivist approach equally show that they are valid methods for carrying out research, but like everything, nothing is one hundred percent accurate. Therefore, there is always room for flaw, but in the study of Sociology, there is always room for more ways of obtaining and interpreting data.
Both ideas which had been differently well developed by Comte and Saint-Simon. Durkheim's holism approach said that sociology should focus on and study large social operations and cultures. He used functionalism, an approach of studying social and cultural phenomena as a set of interdependent parts, to find out the roles these institutions and processes play in keeping social order. Because of this importance in large social processes and institutions, Durkheim's sociology can be described as macro-sociological as compared to a micro-sociological, which takes it's starting point at the individual. Durkheim's main purpose was to give sociology a professional and scientific standing like other traditional social sciences. In order to do this, Durkheim argued that it was essential to clearly state the domain or area of study for sociology. He said that sociology's concern was with the social. This section of the social should be separated from the area of psychological and the individual.
There is one suicide in the world every 40 seconds, but the time you finish one page of this essay it will be another person gone, some might feel sad about it, some might not. Suicide and the morals behind it have been questioned by philosophers, phycologists and people everywhere. There are always two sides to it, if its moral or immoral. In this essay I will compare two essays, one by David Hume’s, who argues suicide is moral and Immanuel Kant who argues that suicide is immoral, and I will argue that Kant’s argument is the weaker one.