Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Individualism-collectivism essays
Individualism vs collectivism
Individualism-collectivism essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Within the limits of comprehension the bases of power that an individual strives for is derived from predetermined events in one’s own childhood. In the case of Ellsworth Toohey and Gail Wynand it isn’t much different. The drive for power that each individual strives for comes from the circumstances they were raised in. The anguished for power that each of them desire is fueled by the actions of the public.
Therefore, Ellsworth Toohey ultimately critics everyone that is more unique and talented then he is. Ultimately, the power he has from putting people down and making them feel bad about themselves is what makes up for Toohey’s lack of talent. Toohey’s methodology makes him a manipulative and devilishly evil person whose only power lies
…show more content…
entirely in his ability to control weaker minds and souls. By making people feel small and guilty, Toohey shakes their faith in their own abilities and then assumes control of their lives. Thus, Toohey’s main object is to create a world without individualism, where everyone is similar in almost all ways from the mid to talent. He states further in the book that "The world of the future. That's what I want. A world of obedience of and unity. A world where the thought of each man will not be his own, but an attempt to guess the thought of the brain of his neighbor who'll have no thought of his own [....]" (4.12.93) Ellsworth’s ideals come from the fact that he himself is not unique in any way and ultimately doesn’t have a skill that sets him apart from his neighbors. Furthermore, his lack of talent makes him a power hunger evil person who wants nothing more than others being normal and the only way to do that is by breaking their sprits so they let go of what makes then fundamentally who they are. On the other hand, Gail Wynand derives his need for power though the newspapers he controls. He influences what the press says and creates a form of Yellow Journalism whenever he so wishes. Wynand did not always have the power he did, he slowly acquired it through dedication and hard work. As a child he grew up in a bad neighborhood with only one way out, gaining power. Unfortunately, in Gail’s road to gaining more power led him astray from the right path. In the book it states that “Gail Wynand delivered his paper, body and soul, to the mob.” Even though his tragic life as a child might have influenced his decisions, but opted to embrace a bad system to ultimately give him more power. Although the influence he has on the people through the press also can back fire on him when it comes to public pressure. For instance when Wynand decided to help Roark by stating in the newspaper that Roark is not a bad person. Unfortunately, the pressure of the public breathing down his neck forcefully made take back what he said about Roark and say that he was the bad person everyone thought him to be. Although, Ellsworth Toohey strive for power due to his unfortunate childhood making him the complete opposite of Roark, Gail Wynand is different in the sense that he was very similar to Roark when he was younger and is trying to go back to his old ways.
As when he and Roark become good friends, the resultant of that made Wynand try and stick up for his friendship with the powers that he had at the time. Even though Wynand succumbed to the pressure of the public and his friends he still tried to change the fact that the power he controlled could be used to tell the truth and not lies. Ultimately, Wynand doesn't have the brass to stand alone against society. He's weak in comparison to Roark, and his weakness helps Rand drive home her Objectivist viewpoint that caring about society in any way, shape or form, is symptomatic of spinelessness. Unlike Gail, Toohey is not even the slightest degree similar to Roark. Howard is a free spirit that cannot be tamed and tends to do thing that are unique as well as unpredictable. Howard believes in individualism and most people credit him with having a boatload of artistic talent, but when it comes to liking or respecting him it's a whole different story. Toohey’s philosophy is the polar opposite of individualism. He's all about collectivism; he believes in the unity. Unlike Roark, who is all about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, Toohey rants about sacrifice, denial, the virtues of being miserable, and the unimportant nature
of the individual and the strength of a community. In conclusion, the aspirations for power that Ellsworth Toohey and Gail Wynand were different in the fact that their experiences in life defined who they are today. Edward was utterly different from the two due to the fact that his aspirations were not about power and greed, but ultimately the constructions of his design. Neither Ellsworth’s nor Gail’s drive for power will measure up to the compassion and ambition that Edward has in his drawings.
Power is a great privilege to have and a person can take advantage of the power if they have it. Getting the privilege of power can be abused and misused depending on the person it is given to. Sometimes if the power lands in the wrong person’s hands they can use it to benefit themselves. In the novel called Montana 1948 by Larry Watson, the power of the law is being abused in the situations occurring throughout the book. Having power and privileges can make a great impact on your life and other people’s lives and give you a variety of advantages.
What is power to a human? As time has gone by, there have been many forms of control and influence in the world. Many strive to achieve total rule over a society or group of individuals. Yet the question still presents itself to the average man. Why does man desire power so greatly even though there is visible trouble that follows? Shelley’s Frankenstein, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”, and Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, whether through the situation or the character themselves, depict the evils and hardships due to an imbalance and poor management of power.
Power, the perception of superiority over another human, is the source of many conflicts between people. Feeling inferior causes people to act beyond their normal personality. John Knowles strongly demonstrates this point in his work, A Separate Peace. In the relationship between Finny and Gene, Gene sets himself up to be inferior in the balance of power which motivates him to act irrationally to take power back from Finny.
The desire for power is prevalent in our day to day life from wanting control over little insignificant aspects to control over others. The Crucible by Arthur Miller is
“Making a Difference” by June Callwood is an expository essay created to inspire the reader to make a change in the world around them, and to stand up for what they believe in. By just doing simple, positive things, people can make a huge impact on their lives and the lives of people around them. June Callwood, author of “Making a Difference”, changes the way many people see the world by describing scientific research and telling the stories of people who performed small, random acts of kindness that made a huge difference in people’s attitudes and the community around them.
Power is an extremely dominant element that illustrates authority and control between the two young men Finny and Gene. Throughout society, “the social power, i.e., the multiplied productive force, which arises through the co-operation of different individuals, since their co-operation is not voluntary but has come about naturally, not as their own united power.”(Tucker, pg.161) Finny conducts himself as an authority figure, and an individualist with distinct and domineering characteristics. He emphasizes his power as a perfect individual that is not concerned what other people conceive of ...
The book “Power” by Linda Hogan is very rich with literary devices like juxtapositions, foreshadowing, symbolism, and personification. It is about a Taiga Native American named Omishto, who sees a Taiga woman named Ama, kill an endangered Florida panther. Omishto, whose name means “the one who watches”, starts viewing Ama as something bigger than herself. The image of Ama is represented as an animal, power, and spirituality.
She presents two contradictory images of society in most of her fiction: one in which the power and prevalence of evil seem so deeply embedded that only destruction may root it out, and another in which the community or even an aggregate of individuals, though radically flawed, may discover within itself the potential for regeneration. (34)
Coretta Scott King was one of the most important women leaders in the world. Working side-by-side with her husband, she took part in the Montgomery Bus Boycott and worked to pass the Civil Rights Act. After King's death, she founded The King Center for Nonviolent Social Change in Atlanta. Mrs. King traveled around the world speaking out on behalf of racial and economic justice, women’s and children’s rights, religious freedom, the needs of the poor and homeless, full-employment, health care, educational opportunities, and environmental justice.
As told by Jim Grove, power is a “desire in all man that ceaseth only with death.” Many crave power, yet only few know how to maintain it. In the novel, The Battle of Jericho and the films, Apocalypse Now and Citizen Kane, rank or position, pride and gender inequality promote power in lives of the protagonists and significant characters. Each element indirectly correlates with advancement of power.
Power can be defined as the ability to influence or outright control the behavior of people. A variety of different things can drive power, including both knowledge and experience. Power in most cases is needed to establish authority. In today’s country, the United States government has a lot of power. It has so much power that even American citizens are beginning to complain about it. Having all this power and authority has allowed the government to make decisions quicker. However, by making decisions faster, some mistakes can be made and innocent people can be convicted. This point is directly exemplified when using two New Yorker articles, “Surviving Solitary” and ‘A Shot to The Heart.” Both articles consist of results produced quite
Power is a key issue in separating the educated from the uneducated. One of the reasons that society is able to dictate the way people in mainstream society lives is through power. Society practically has power over every aspect of daily life. Society derives this power from the people whom make up mainstream America. Mainstream America has been trained over the years tha...
From the displays of power that have been shown through out this essay, we see that this story is a story about power. Power is the story is primarily about peoples need for some small amount of power to survive in life and to feel that hey have a purpose within their society which every society it may be whether its is Gilead or Nazi Germany or modern day Britain.
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic structural analyses and agency-centred traditions. According to this, people are free to act, but they must also use and replicate fundamental structures of power by and through their own actions. Power is wielded and maintained by how one ‘makes a difference’ and based on their decisions and actions, if one fails to exercise power, that is to ‘make a difference’ then power is lost. (Giddens: 1984: 14) However, more recent theorists have revisited older conceptions including the power one has over another and within the decision-making processes, and power, as the ability to set specific, wanted agendas. To put it simply, power is the ability to get others to do something they wouldn’t otherwise do. In the political arena, therefore, power is the ability to make or influence decisions that other people are bound by.
Power acts as a catalyst in a society which is vulnerable to mass hysteria and causes individuals to favor unjust trials for personal gain.