Elizabeth Warren's Argument Analysis

493 Words1 Page

In the article, Mass. Sen. Elizabeth Warren chastised Donald Trump for using the phrase nasty woman in one of the last presidential debates. Now obviously, this is something characteristic of Donald to do. He frequently speaks without thinking in the hopes that the audience will appreciate the cleverness of whatever comment comes out of his mouth. However, the phrase nasty woman isn’t one that sounds like some random comment. The disposition of his figure and the low and demeaning tone he used when describing her as a nasty woman has a framing effect on the audience. The audience may have disapproved of the comment but because of the way uttered the comment, they may also come to view whatever she says following the comment as something a “nasty …show more content…

Warren turned the situation right back around when she announced how atrocious not only that behavior was but his behavior is consistently towards women. As the audience recalls the comment in the presidential debate, she follows it up by referencing the other moments where he took advantage of women to paint the mental set of trump as both a physical and verbal abuser of women. This may not be the complete story but the power of the misinformation effect enhances all past memories relating to his abuse as even more drastic than they already seemed. After this election is over I can imagine that Trump is going to have a very hard time associating with anyone who self-identifies as a woman because all their available memories of Trump associating with women are vividly abusive. As the availability heuristic explains, their first thought will be most likely one that’s related to him groping them or him calling them some name that they would rather not be called. Imagine what most Americans must think of trump when they’re in the voting booths. Most likely their thought won’t revolve around the issues that he neglects to speak on but instead their thoughts will revolve around what type of person he is or how much they would rather not have their children observationally learn from the man. As an authority figure, anything he does in front of an impressionable mind seems like

Open Document