Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elie wiesel life during the Holocaust
Elie Wiesel about the Holocaust
Elie wiesel life during the Holocaust
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During times of war, mankind's humanity is unknowingly corrupted. Humans are capable of causing suffering by doing nothing - by not interfering with the bad things that happen, self-proclaimed ‘good people’ allow others to undergo misery. Elie Wiesel speaks about the world’s lack of intervention during the Holocaust in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, angry, “that the world did know and remained silent” (Document B), and goes on to explain how, “neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented” (Document B). Wiesel is anguished that so many people stood by and watched as others were systematically murdered by their own government. Citizens that were not persecuted were so terrified …show more content…
Wiesel uses parallelism in his statement to emphasize just how ineffective inaction is. His two claims, “neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim” and, “silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented” are essentially the same statement, just reworded to completely attest to how useless being a bystander is. Peoples’ necessity for self-preservation during the Holocaust allowed them to knowingly let millions of others suffer. Though rational, their fear of the Nazis was unnecessary, because if everyone stood up to them, there would be no way to persecute them all. The uselessness of bystanders is further proven by the Bystander Effect, a social phenomenon that claims,“the more potential helpers there are, the less likely any individual is to help” (Thomas 2016). One theory as to why this phenomenon occurs is because when there are multiple people present, there is diffusion of responsibility, meaning each person is only partially responsible for resolving the crisis, compared to in a smaller group when everyone has an escalated amount of …show more content…
Because the event was so public, few actually felt the need to prevent it from happening because there were so many other people there to solve the problem, allowing them to stand idly by and watch the whole thing happen from the comfort and safety of their homes. The dangers of the Bystander Effect are also apparent in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), a document created in 1948 by the United Nations as a vow to prevent barbaric acts, such as the Holocaust, from ever recurring and to protect everyone’s most basic rights. Article Three of the declaration states that, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person” (Document G). This means that every single person, regardless of any possible prejudice, is entitled to live their life as a safe, free person. These are the fundamental rights set forth by Enlightenment thinker John Locke in Two Treatises of Government, written in 1689, over 250 years prior to the adoption of the
“People who had incurred the displeasure of the party simply disappeared and were never heard of again.
“He say Mr. Parris must be kill! Mr. Parris no goodly man, Mr. Parris mean man and no gentle man and he bid me rise out of bed and cut your throat!” (Miller 47).
Speeches are given for a purpose. Whether it is for persuasion, or education, or even entertainment, they all target certain parts of people’s minds. This speech, The Perils of Indifference, was given by Elie Wiesel with intention to persuade his audience that indifference is the downfall of humanity, and also to educate his audience about his conclusions about the Holocaust and the corresponding events. He was very successful in achieving those goals. Not only was the audience enlightened, but also President Bill Clinton, and the First Lady, Hillary Clinton, themselves were deeply touched by Wiesel’s words.
Along with rhetorical appeals, Wiesel also uses many rhetorical devices such as parallelism and anaphora. Wiesel depicts parallelism when he says, “to fight fascism, to fight dictatorship, to fight Hitler” (Wiesel lines 103-104). The parallelism and anaphora, in the quote, provide emphasis on the discrimination and abuse that has taken place around the world. Repeating the same initial phrase shows the significance of the words Wiesel is speaking. Wiesel mentions the victims of this extreme tragedy when he states,” for the children in the world, for the homeless for the victims of injustice, the victims of destiny and society.” (Wiesel lines 17-19). This use of anaphora and parallelism emphasize the amount of people the Holocaust has affected and impacted. The parallelism being used adds value to his opinions and balances the list of people Wiesel is making in his speech.
Elie Weisel once said this: “I know and I speak from experience, that even in the midst of darkness, it is possible to create light and share warmth with one another; that even on the edge of the abyss, it is possible to dream exalted dreams of compassion; that it is possible to be free and strengthen the ideals of freedom, even within prison walls; that even in exile, friendship becomes an anchor.” Compassion is not something that is easy to understand, or even easy to show sometimes. The Holocaust was a difficult time to comprehend: how could one man have so much power and hate towards a society of people that he started a genocide? There may never be the right emotional explanation to describe the disturbing events that happened during the Holocaust, but Elie Weisel was able to share his. His message was that compassion and friendship can refrain someone from sinking so deep into a dark sea like the Holocaust.
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that described a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation. Swift hoped to reach not only the people of Ireland who he was calling to action, but the British, who were oppressing the poor. He writes with contempt for those who are oppressing the Irish and also dissatisfaction with the people in Ireland themselves to be oppressed.
Throughout the speech, Wiesel utilizes a wide range of tones and uses strategic pauses so the audience experiences no difficulties in understanding the struggle he went through. In one of his more intense moments of the speech, he begins talking about how much worse being ignored was, versus being unjustly judged. Religion may be unjust, but it is not indifferent. People cannot live “Outside God” (Wiesel), they need Him even if He is far away.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Oppression is the systematic method of prolonged cruelty and unjust treatment, often intended for those who are deemed “different” by a hierarchical society. It’s a basis that can be found in the plot of a fictional movie or novel, but most importantly, it’s an aspect of both past and modern life that has affected multiple nations. Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, is a humanitarian who embodies the personal experiences of what being oppressed feels like – how it itches at one’s skin like the hatred and stares directed at them. The reason he is so important is because of his stories; what he has seen. The insight and intelligence he has brought forth further educates those who had previously accepted the world with their eyes closed.
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Well-known Noble Peace prize winner, Elie Wiesel, in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, admonishing indifference and history in his time. Wiesel’s purpose is to impress upon the audience that being indifferent is as bad as committing the wrong doing. He creates warm, sentimental tone to convey to the audience his experience in the Holocaust and how he was treated. As well as making the point about the people who were indifferent and how they could’ve made a difference just by lending a helping hand.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
The Holocaust was a plan to eliminate all indifferent people, such as, Jews, homosexuals, and intellectually disabled. In Elie Wiesel's, “The Perils of Indifference”, the author explains the pain of indifference and the struggles of the groups of people throughout history that have lived with indifference. For example, the Jewish people had all of their rights, freedom, and happiness taken away from them. This cruel act of dehumanization resulted in the people being treated like farm animals led to a slaughter.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1948, was the result of the experience of the Second World War. With the end of that war, and the creation of the United Nations, the international community vowed never again to allow atrocities like those of that conflict happen again. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and rel...
First of all over time the oppressed will lose hope in mankind. “How was it possible that men women and children were being burned but the world kept silent” (Weisel 33). It's hard to believe with the immense size of the death factories, such as Auschwitz, that it took so long for the world to react. One may wonder if people just didn't want to face reality when evil was so prevalent. “The world is not interested in us. Today everything is possible even the crematorium” (Elie's Father 34). Hope was lost when the world turned its back on the Jewish people. For many they felt abandoned and unworthy, they actually died before dying. Therefore, without hope in mankind our existence is meaningless.