Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of technology on education
Advantages and disadvantages of using technology in a classroom
Advantages and disadvantages of using technology in a classroom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of technology on education
Digital Parent Trap
Technology used for communication was created to save time and make work more efficient. In time the dependency on technology increased into other functions, including television, computers and gaming and so has the efficiency. Parents are aware of the impact modern technology has on their children. They are highly concerned with the effects and hope that they won't' fall into the technology trap. Elaina Dockterman, author of the Time article, "The Digital Parent Trap", goes against the prosaic by persuading readers that if used correctly, technology can be beneficial at an early age introduction. Dockterman accomplishes this by effectively using logical appeals, establishing credibility, and applying emotional appeals. Initially, Dockterman states numerous statistics to her audience to catch their attention.
…show more content…
For example, in the fourth paragraph Dockterman utilized data to build her argument, by stating that the upcoming year will be the most tech savvy school year ever.
Her use of data on how Los Angeles school district intends to spend over 30 million in technology is meant to shock the reader and put into perspective, how incredibly important technology is in the classroom today. Dockterman allows for the reader to form their own thoughts about the emphasis others put on the importance of technology. Also, Dockterman initiates her argument of the benefits of early exposure with these statistics. Furthermore, in paragraph fourteen, Dockterman definitely states her argument by including data such as "Students remember 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear, 50% of what they see demonstrated, but 90% when interacting and learning hands on. The data allows the reader to visualize and persuades the acceptance of Dockterman’s claims of validly on why schools are investing in technology. Dockterman uses logic when stating that technology is here to stay, and as schools embrace it, YOU should
too. In addition to logical appeal, Dockterman builds her argument by establishing her credibility. She achieves this by introducing both sides of the argument in her article, and then refuting the extremist side (no technology whatsoever). She indicates in paragraph eight that, cyberbullying is a risk which can cause children to have feelings of depression and insecurity. Also, too much screen time can lead to health issues such as obesity. Dockterman then disproves that statement by showing in paragraph twelve that social networking sites also offer extraordinary learning opportunities. The evidence she included was a SRI study, stating that people who played educational games like Samorost did 12% better on logic tests than those who did not. The introduction of a counterclaim with evidence, and then disproving it throughout the article, Dockterman again builds her credibility. She allows the reader to see that she is not biased- only showing the benefits- but also showing the harmful effects of too much technology can cause. Dockterman disproving the counter argument emphasizes the fact that there are two sides to every argument and fully embraces that idea. Finally, Dockterman provides an emotional appeal to wrap up her argument. In paragraph sixteen, Dockterman includes an interview with a public-school principal, of a low-income neighborhood. In the interview, Principal Jackson states, “If you look at applying for a college or job, that's on the computer... If we're not exposing our students to this stuff early, they are going to be left behind". Jackson clearly implies the urgency to increase effectiveness of technology in public schools to better prepare students for the future. By stating the hardest challenges in life, such as applying for acceptance to college or simply applying for a job, Dockterman reaches into the reader's conscience, identifying that action must be taken to increase technology's effectiveness so that we do not let our children fall behind. In closing, Eliana Dockterman effectively includes logos, ethos, and pathos appeals to persuade the reader that early introduction and frequent exposure to technology has major benefits. The use of data to inform the reader of increasing technology, disproving the counterargument to increase credibility, and appealing to readers emotions, Dockterman clearly establishes her point view, technology needs to be embraced and the benefits will speak for themselves.
The author is able to establish herself by citing authoritative sources in paragraph 9, where research is cited from MIT that shows retention rates dramatically increase through the use of technology. By citing such authoritative sources, as MIT is renowned and reputable for their actions, the author is able to establish her viewpoint as credible and right. The author’s quotation of respectable sources leaves the reader with no choice but to see the author’s viewpoint as valid. This furthers her line of argumentation that there are benefits to early exposure to technology.
Can you imagine how children do not seem to have any problems in learning how technology works now? It happens that almost every kid has their own laptop, cell phone, iPads or any other electronic devices. Who does not want to live in this world where doing homeworks and making your job much easier, right? If children nowadays are too lucky to have and learn these things while they are young, most of us grew up and experienced the life without technology. In "My Technologically Challenged Life" by Monica Wunderlich, she talked about the different struggles she had experienced in her house, school, workplace, and her car due to the lack of technology.
In this article, he offers a well-illustrated analysis that encourages readers to regulate the use of technology in the classroom. He believes that technology can get in the way of building a strong foundation of basic skills and insists that computers should aid the learning process, not replace cognitive thinking. Gelernter admits that computers are helpful for educational purposes if used wisely. He suggests, “Computers have the potential to accomplish great things. With the right software, they could help make science tangible or teach neglected topics like art and music” (278).
“The Risks of Parenting While Plugged In” by Julie Scelfo. This article was about parents paying too much attention to technology that they forget about their little ones. Also how using too much technology can affect your child in negative ways. In the article she states an incident she saw with a mother and son. The son was repeatedly trying to get his moms attention but she wouldn’t look up. Things like this can make children feel ignored make them feel upset. It could make them be on the internet just as much as their parents. Parents now days need to put time aside for their little ones. I agree that things need to change, and we can have better focused parents.
The second idea that Postman gives, he does admit that it is desperate, is to address the problem that exists throughout schools. Postman does acknowledge that all of this exposes a type of typical American faith in the possibilities of the American education system. He writes that we have not yet investigated the way printed text affects the way our minds work. Postman stays somewhat optimistic, that teachers are actually becoming more “media conscious” in a world that demands a person to know about new forms of technology (162).
We live in a time where technology is at the center of our society. We use technology on a daily basis, for the simplest tasks, or to aid us in our jobs, and don’t give a second thought to whether these tools are actually helping us. Writers such as Kevin Kelly and Clive Thompson argue that the use of technology actually helps us humans; whiles writers such as Nicholas Carr argue that technology affects people’s abilities to learn information negatively.
Where a student once had to travel to the local library or bookstore to find information, they can now find information almost instantly in their “smart” phone. In this technological age “we are raising our children in a multimedia environment. Before writing and books, information was carried in songs, dance, and storytelling. Today, the average person has a cornucopia of information readily available at home.” (Withrow 44). Anyone in possession of a computer, digital e-reader, laptop, or “smart” phone has an almost immediate access to any kind of information they are seeking. In today’s society, a two-year-old child knows how to operate a tablet or “smart” phone before they know how to read. It is this interest in technology that leads to a decline in reading as children age. Where once it would take hours to find information, there is now an almost immediate response to queries. Through the instant gratification technology provides, children begin to lose interest in reading. According to Michael, the disinterest in reading is “because reading takes time, and we have an instant gratification generation who can’t wait to read the book when they can just watch the movie” (Michael). Instead of spending days discovering a new world in a book, a child can instead spend a couple hours in front of a television and watch
One of the key arguments presented by Postman is the double-edged effect of any technological innovation, and therein lies the greatest strength of his assertion. He argues that any new technology is “both a burden and a blessing” (Postman, 1993, p. 5), given that technology introduces fundamental change in society as it modifies the structure of the things people think about, the nature and language of how they think as well as the character of the community they live in where ideas develop (p.20). While the benefits of television have included the development of literacy skills at an early stage, there are also growing concerns about television content and children’s viewing habits, and how these factors ultimately affect the deve...
People very often debate whether technology is good or bad. Many people believe that technology can only cause harm to their lives and society, while many others strongly defend the technologies which have made their lives much more leisurely and enriching than it could have been several hundred years ago. In my opinion, both of these views are correct to an extent, but I also believe that what should be examined is not whether technology in its self is good or bad, but rather how we as humans use it.For decades now, television has been accused of contributing to the dissolution of the American family and the destruction of the minds of those who watch it. However, although the TV has been involved in this, the problem roots not with technology but rather the people who choose to let it run their lives. I believe this because it is parents, not TV sets, who choose to let their children sit in front of the television for hours upon hours, and it is the parents who do not intervene and replace TV time with quality family time.
Do you ever think about how much technology has changed the way we work, learn, play, and even think? Technology is a major beneficiary to society; especially in the classroom where we get the opportunity to learn and grow. In recent years, schools have begun implementing tablets and other devices in the classroom to better student’s education. The use of technology in the classroom provides more of a personalized learning experience and gives students a widespread availability to engage in learning. Technology is necessary in today’s modern globe, it is basically “the pen and paper of our time and the lens through which we experience much of our world” (Warlick, 2013). Technology is not just considered the “internet”, it is so much greater than that. Overall, it enhances the quality of education and engages students deeper than ever before. With all the significant gains, why would people argue that technology hinders students more than it helps? Critics may try to repute the use of technology in the classroom but I believe what really matters “is the way we use it, the context that we use it in, and the learners who we use it for” (Chong, 2012).
Loop, Erica. Exposing the Negative Effects of Technology on Kids. Global Post. ND. Web 19
As disclosed in the article, The Impact of Technology on the Developing Child, Chris Rowan acknowledges, “Rather than hugging, playing, rough housing, and conversing with children, parents are increasingly resorting to providing their children with more TV, video games, and the latest iPads and cell phone devices, creating a deep and irreversible chasm between parent and child” (par. 7). In the parent’s perspective, technology has become a substitute for a babysitter and is becoming more convenient little by little. It is necessary for a growing child to have multiple hours of play and exposure to the outside world each day. However, the number of kids who would rather spend their days inside watching tv, playing video games, or texting is drastically increasing. Children are not necessarily the ones to be blamed for their lack of interest in the world around them, but their parents for allowing their sons and daughters to indulge in their relationship with technology so powerfully. Kids today consider technology a necessity to life, because their parents opted for an easier way to keep their children entertained. Thus resulting in the younger generations believing that technology is a stipulation rather than a
Technology has more negative effects on today’s society than positive. Due to technology in the past few decades Canine Shock Collars have been increasingly popular. Students in school pay more attention to texting than they do their classes. Violent addictive video games have made their way into American homes. Parents encourage their children to not text as much, but them to face the problem of constant communication. The Internet gives the students easier ways to cheat in school, and reinforces laziness. Internet Porn gives every bored male a chance to look at the seediest film in the comfort of his own home. Technology has taken the innocence and mystery away from the American family.
... only become greater. With the progression of technology our lives become easier and everyday tasks become simpler to complete, but with increase in ease and simplicity comes a decrease in authentic interactions and activities. Modern technology has almost replaced our generation’s physical social lives, it has left many basic skills unlearned, and has ultimately become a physical part of who we are. Our devices seem to be part of us, and functioning without them, for most, is an unthinkable thought. The effects on our generation’s lives today are all but minimal. With technology progressing each and every day one might find themselves observing the young children who already have the skills to unlock ipones, open and close apps, and who might even own their own “kids tablet,” and ask “How will advances in technology effect the next generation’s lives?”
Richtel, Matt. "Growing Up Digital, Wired for Distraction." The New York Times. N.p., 21/11/12. Web. 16 Sep 2012. < http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/technology/21brain.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all>