Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Poetry analysis - war poetry
Poet attitude to war
Poet attitude to war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Poetry analysis - war poetry
ESSAY ON 3 WAR POEMS
No man wants to go to war and no government wants war but there are
many different circumstances that lead to the action of war. Those
involved in war will have political and personal views towards it. The
First World War was greeted with great enthusiasm and patriotism;
however it was the war in which millions died compared to the wars
after. In the past 200 years warfare has changed and with this change
the ideas on war have changed too.
Wilfred Owen, Rudyard Kipling and David Roberts are well known war
poets. Using a selection of their poems we hope to analyze the two
conflicting views on war.
To understand what influenced the poets we need to get an idea of
their social and historical background.
The poet Rudyard Kipling was an ex army official so his poems on war
can be trusted. However during Kipling’s war days war was not fully
mechanized so Kipling cannot really describe the horror of WW1.
In his poem ‘For All We Have and Are’ Rudyard Kipling uses words and
phrases like “For all our children’s fate” to emphasize the need for
war, Saying if you are not going to fight for yourself than fight for
your children.
He than justifies going to war by saying “a crazed and driven foe”. I
think by this he means that our foe is mentally disturbed we have to
stop him for his own and others benefit. He than says “The Hun is at
the gate” Meaning that the Germans are coming. If we don’t go out and
meet them they will attack us. He also curses the Germans by calling
them Huns.
The Huns were originally an ancient tribe who ravaged and plundered
every where they went. By calling the Germans, Huns Rudyard Kipling
suggests that they are the same and present a danger to all so we hav...
... middle of paper ...
... the stupidity of the war and uses sarcastic
phrases such as ‘It must take guts to drop those bombs on defenceless
people who had no chance’ to emphasize the unfairness of the war.
Roberts also says ‘Your boys didn’t have to maim and kill or break the
hearts of other mothers’ by this statement I think he means that I
know your depressed about the loss of your sons but think of the other
mothers whose hearts your sons broke by killing people who like them
were just following orders.
In this poem I feel David Roberts challenges the government’s decision
to go to war against Iraq by calling this war the ‘shamefullest of
wars’ and by highlighting the depression and death it has already
caused.
If you look at the differences between the 3 poems described you will
find that as time want on and war got uglier you started hearing more
of the truth about war.
There are many reasons that the human race goes to war against each other. In the essay The Ecstasy of War (1997) by Barbara Ehrenreich, she states that one reason that war is started between men is people want to expand, to move further in life and the man-kind are trained to be ready for war.
Generally, war results from arguments between nations over things like land, power, money, or religion. War over religion contradicts religion itself. In the passage titled “On War”, James Boswell states, “That amiable religion which “proclaims peace on earth,” hath not as yet made war to cease.” If religion proclaims peace on earth, then war goes against those morals.
War is an organized and often prolonged conflict by a leader that is carried out by states or non-state actors and is generally characterized by extreme violence, social disruption and economic destruction. Now, some may say that war is needed for a country to succeed as would the Italian philosopher by the name Nicollo Machiavelli who explains characteristics and plans that these war leaders must follow in order to succeed. However, some also may say that war is a path of evil and a country should live in peace as taught by an ancient Chinese philosopher by the name of Lao Tzu. Equally important that these two different ideals may be, countries can use some of the ideas from both philosophers to help in times of battle.
are not free in service, you do what you are told and this is the same
order to have a war, you need yet more causes for that to come about,
“War may well be the worst way imaginable to create larger, more peaceful societies, but the depressing fact is that it is pretty much the only way” (Morris 1). To elaborate, war sadly is the only method that works, even though that a lot of things happen that are unfortunate. Some examples of war being necessary are The Revolutionary War, World War II, and The French and Indian War.
War is used as a solution to a conflict; two countries that are not getting along usually fight each other for power or to show which is stronger. Many different things cause war, but it all starts with the government. A government that is hungry for power and money would do anything to get what it wants. The more power the government has, the more power they’ll want. Another cause of war is believed to be religion, different religions describe different ideas and understandings, but those different ideas are disagreements over many things. If a government didn’t like another’s idea it causes disagreement, and that means war.
The next line expresses the way in which he has no grave stone, just a
war is a war engaged in by all if not most of the principle nations of the
Considered the leading English poet of the First World War, Owen is remembered for realistic poems depicting the horrors of war, which were inspired by his experiences at the Western Front in 1916 and 1917. Owen considered the true subject of his poems to be "the pity of war," and attempted to present the true horror and realities of battle and its effects on the human spirit. His unique voice, which is less passionate and idealistic than those of other war poets, is complemented by his unusual and experimental style of writing. He is recognized as the first English poet to successfully use pararhyme, in which the rhyme is made through altered vowel sounds. Owen’s distinct way of both writing and reading poems led to influence other poets in the 1920s and 1930s.
The writers of 'Joining the Colours' and 'The Send Off' both use poetry to express their feelings about soldiers leaving for war. Each have similar attitudes about the subject, but use different approaches to try and get their message across. Both question the popular concept of war, including ideas such as heroism and glory. Katherine Hinkson, the poet who wrote 'Joining the Colours', shows the scene from two different perspectives, that of the audience watching the soldiers and also her own point of view. Wilfred Owen simply shares his thoughts by describing the soldiers leaving from a station, although the effect is no less powerful. As Hinkson is a woman, she focuses more on a mother or wives point of view, whereas Owen gives more of the soldiers perspective.
War is a mean to achieve a political goal.it is merely the continuation of policy in a violent form. “War is not merely an act of policy, but a true political instrument....” Moreover, the intensity of war will vary with the nature of political motives. This relationship makes war a rational act rather than a primitive and instinctive action, where war uses coercion to achieve political goals instead of use it only for destruction, and it cannot be separated from each other even after the war has started, when each side is allowed to execute its requisite responsibilities while remaining flexible enough to adapt to emerging
Strong, brave, and powerful are usually the words that come to mind when you think of a traditional war hero. In Tim O’Brien’s novel he uses war heroes that aren’t what people usually imagine when they think of a war hero. They are straight out of high school, and most of the soldiers in his novel are cowards. They are scared of going into the war and even when they have a chance to save one of their friends they just let them die. Not using traditional war heroes allowed Tim O’Brien to show that not all heroes are heroic and courageous, and that they were just normal people going into a war they didn’t understand.
Society portrays heroes as doing good, as defending against a clear evil. Our society has Superheroes whom we idolize, but is that a true hero? Is it someone who dies with a clear conscience, or is it someone who has had to make some of the most difficult decisions to allow them to serve, protect, and survive. “Hero of War,” a song by Rise Against, and American Sniper by Chris Kyle show that the definition of hero is not as cut and dry as we might think. A soldier is a hero until someone hears what happened over seas, when they hear of the horrific things that happened in another country; but those exact experiences are what make them a true hero.
War has been a prominent phenomenon that can be seen throughout the history of mankind, and it has been used as a tool by people in order to fulfil their needs. It is influential in reaching a peaceful resolution, and it acts as a refresher because without it society would be in chaos. War has allowed great empires, like the Napoleon Empire, to flourish and prosper, and has caused great empires, like the Roman Empire, to fall. War is needed in order to maintain a healthy and stable society. It is beneficial to the strength and socialization of a society, the health of its people, the productivity of the economy, and it can be used to force social changes and call for justice.