Dynamic Dominant Leg

1368 Words3 Pages

2. Methods
2.1 Participants
Twenty-six active young adults (14 males and 12 females) with no history of neurological or musculoskeletal abnormalities (within the last six months) that could affect balance participated in this study (Table 1). Ninety-six percent of subjects’ dynamic dominant leg was the right leg. All subjects gave informed written consent prior to data collection. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethical Committee of the University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Table 1 Characteristics of the subjects.
Data (mean and SD) Male (n = 15) Female (n = 15) p-value
Age [years] 25.8 (2.9) 24.6 (5.3)
Weight [kg] 77.5 (10. 8) 62.6 (4.9)
Height [m] 180.0 (7.2) 169.2 (4.3)
BMI [kg/m2]
Right dynamic dominant …show more content…

The dynamic dominant leg or preferred kicking leg was defined from which leg subjects preferred to select for kicking a ball with the feeling more accurately than another, while static dominant leg or preferred unipedal stance leg was defined from which leg subjects preferred to use for standing on one leg with the feeling more stable or comfortable than another (Huurnink, 2014). One trial of eighty second tested times was completed barefoot stance on normal ground with the hands on the hips in both legs. For the starting position, subjects were asked to flex hip and knee of their lifted leg at 20 and 45 degree, respectively, and placed their stance foot (the 2nd metatarsal bone) over a marker on the floor. Throughout the tested period, subjects were instructed to stand still, to focus on a target (red circle 10 cm in diameter against a white background) on the wall placed at the individual eye level approximately 5 meters away, and to avoid any voluntary movements such as scratching or turning the head. To assure position of the stance foot of each subject on the ground was the same position, the direction of the big toe was pointed to the direction of a red dot on the wall. After the end of each trial, subjects were allowed to seated rest at least for one minute break and up to three minutes depend on …show more content…

The data of a middle sixty second (from 10 s to 70 s) of each trial was selected to analyse in order to avoid the voluntary movement and acceleration period. There were five steps for analysing postural control movement via Principle Component Analysis (PCA) of kinematics data including 1) selection of markers, 2) normalization of posture vectors, 3) PCA, 4) kinematics in posture space, and 5) calculation of dependent variables.

Firstly, in selection of marker step, nine asymmetrical markers placed on upper arms, lower arms, right scapular, upper thighs and lower thighs were omitted for the analysis. If a trial of one leg standing was performed by the left foot, then the data were mirrored and relabeled such that all datasets for the PCA analysis had standing on the right foot (ref/Thomas….). The idea of using the PCA with kinematics data in this study is that each marker coordinates together quantifying the posture of the subjects at a giving time interpreted as a posture

Open Document