Drones Argumentative Essay

Drones change the way to fight to remote warfare. United States started using drones right away after 9/11 happened. They sent drones to terrorist countries. The use of drone strikes should be used abroad to save the lives of more American and Allied forces while successfully battling terrorism. The United States drones strike program has made a difference. Use of drone strikes saves the lives of American troops. Drones were built to protect pilots, ground troops and save lives. Some people believe that using drones decreases risk to all soldiers. As stated in, Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?, ProCon.org. "Drones ProCon.org." ProCon.org. 14 Sep. 2016, 1:58 p.m., drones.procon.org, they point out that

Under the law of war, whether engaging in hostilities...or exercising the inherent right to self-defense, an armed attack must adhere to the principles of necessity and distinction. In their article, Steven Groves is Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation, They said “The principle of distinction requires that only combatants and military objectives be targeted” (Drone Strikes: The Legality of U.S. Targeting Terrorists Abroad). The principle of necessity requires that an attack against an enemy provide the attacker with a “definite military advantage” for the purpose of effecting the “complete submission of the enemy as soon as possible. In the article, Steven Groves is Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation. “If it is deemed militarily necessary to target an operative, a law-of-war principle of “proportionality” must also be met for such a strike on an operative to be considered lawful and not a war crime”(Drone Strikes: The Legality of U.S. Targeting Terrorists Abroad). Proportionality: A principle requires belligerents to attend to minimizing harm to innocent civilians during an armed attack; avoiding

Drone proponents argue that lawful use should continue until non-state, transnational terrorist organizations no longer present an imminent threat to the United States. In the article, Steven Groves is Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation, “Proponents support the priority use of any tool to prevent future terrorist plots or successful attacks on the United States Homeland”(Drone Strikes: The Legality of U.S. Targeting Terrorists Abroad). Congressional Authorization. In the article, Steven Groves is Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation, “The days following the 9/11 attacks, Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force”(Drone Strikes: The Legality of U.S. Targeting Terrorists Abroad). The authorization provides the President the ability to use all force deemed necessary and appropriate against a person, organization, or nation to prevent any future terrorism against the United States The Right to Self-Defense: In the article, Steven Groves is Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a