The Pros And Cons Of Drone Attacks

499 Words1 Page

Have you ever looked in the sky and saw a type of aircraft that looked too compact to be an actual plane and looked nothing like a helicopter. Well, that aircraft that you saw, was probably a drone. Since the terrorist attack September 11, 2001, the United States have been using drones to carry out missions like killing terrorist group members all over the world. There are numerous pros and cons of utilizing drones and not everyone conquers with using them on the battlefield. Drones should be used against our enemies around the world. Ultimately, drones should be used against terrorists around the globe and here is the reason why, “they ultimately make the United States safer by annihilating groups of terrorists around the world” (Drones ProCon). Not only do drones make the …show more content…

Some cons of utilizing drones are “in some cases, drones make more terrorists than they kill. People who witness loved ones be injured or killed by drone attacks can, consequently, be motivated to join operations that are against the United States” (Drones ProCon). Occasionally “drone strikes may target individuals that are not involved with any terrorist group” (Drones ProCon). Not only do drones falsely target people, they moreover “kill large numbers of civilians and traumatize local populations” (Drones ProCon). Would you be traumatized if a compact unmanned aircraft came to your town or city and started to drop bombs. I sure would be. “Drone strikes mainly kill low-value targets that are not an immediate danger to the United States” (Drones ProCon). “Drone strikes are secretive” and numerous people think that they “lack enough legal oversight” (Drones ProCon). Drone strikes also make it to where if something goes wrong, “citizens cannot hold their leaders responsible” (Drones ProCon). A drone strike also, apparently, “violates the sovereignty of other states” (Drones

Open Document