Final Paper assignment
In his article,“Driving While Stupid”, David Barry expresses his opinions toward the drivers in Miami, and in different countries as well. Even though he has met bad drivers throughout his life, he strongly believed that Miami drivers are the worst drivers because of the way the drive. David Barry describes all the bad drivers he has seen to prove his point that drivers in Miami are still the worst drivers. David Barry uses his sense of humor to express his experience bad drives he has come in contact with. He gives examples of shocking moments he has experienced in major cities in the United States. He describes drivers in Boston as people who are rushing to jump across a drawbridge that is ahead of them. Additionally, David Barry shared his experience with worst drivers in the rest of the world including Italy, China, and Argentina. He suggest that everyone should close their eyes while riding a taxi in Argentina because nobody drive slower than 65 mph in the road and in the parking garage as well. David Barry was also surprised by the Italian traffic law which gives every driver the platform to behave the way they want while driving. He said, “I have also driven in Italy where there is only one traffic law, which is that no driver may ever be behind
…show more content…
He also hope that the readers are not actually reading the article while reading because it will like a waste of time for him because through his article “Driving while stupid”, David Berry is trying to persuade people to pay more attention while they are driving and be always be careful when they are driving. Therefore, his message will not impact people if those who are supposed to make a difference, are actually making the same stupid mistake of reading while
Barry considers himself as one of the “normal” drivers as he refers the other drivers as “testosterone-deranged youths.” He mentions in this part of the story that “So the tiny minority of us Miami drivers who actually qualify as normal find ourselves constantly being trapped behind people drifting along the interstate at the speed of diseased livestock, while at the same time they are being tailgated by the testosterone-deranged youths”(92). Many people could see his point of view from this part as they experience this not only in Miami, but in other parts of America as well. Everyone has had road rage or at least experienced road rage once in their life
What prompts him to write this essay, is from constantly having to deal with the same types of drivers that cause him to get angry, or rage. He was living in Miami whilst writing this, which is a city of a large population, with lots of traffic. The immediate audience targeted would be other drivers, as reading this would get his points out and maybe they’d stop doing certain things he mentioned. The secondary audience would be future drivers, as they would now know what they should maybe sometimes avoid doing. Like when he mentions “-the aggressive young male whose car has a sound system so powerful and the driver must go faster than the speed of sound at all times-”. Future drivers may read this and think twice about doing it.
He creatively conveys this idea by using an example of various people in their unique cars with different bumper stickers to represent their diverse beliefs. By doing so, he paints an image that portrays all of these people in their cars, with their passionate opinions, are normally traveling through traffic, not caring who believes what. This descriptive portrait show the author’s ideal versions of society, where people don’t blow things out of proportion just because they hold different opinions. In the example he adds that, of course, “there will be a selfish jerk who zips up the shoulder and cuts in a the last minute” to represent a “real” problem of America and stating that the individual “is scorned. This crazy driver is meant to highlight that, yes, there will be some real threats in the world, but America will be more apt to dealing with them if Americans put aside their minor differences and focus only on the problems that are a real danger to the country. Stewart’s traffic example contributes to his purpose by displaying every day people that get along just fine, despite what they might believe, thus showing his viewers that different people are able to get along just fine on a daily
Commonly, vehicular collisions are considered a negative occurrence. Dave Eggers hints towards this mindset in his short story Accident. Plotted in the middle of an intersection in 2005, the story commences with the main character driving his automobile through the intersection and striking an older Camaro. The three teenagers in the Camaro are fine, but the main character notices all the damage he has done to their vehicle and he fears an unpleasant encounter with them. Dave Eggers uses irony throughout the situation to illustrate the main character’s relief. The characters’ involvement with the collision emphasizes Egger’s theme that no matter how unfortunate an incident, positivity can result.
He talks about how when we were in Italy that the only law was that “no driver may ever be behind any other driver” he says this jokingly not thinking that anyone would take him seriously. But they may drive like that because of how their culture is or how that is just how they drive in their country but, he is trying to show us as the reader that he has seen a lot of bad driving in his time. Because of him humorous ways in the passage it grabs our attention and allures us to just keep reading and see what he must say about Miami drivers and to see just how they are. Although, he makes a good argument he uses his personal experiences and puts a little humorous twist on them; So, he doesn’t have any hard facts on drivers around the world and especially the ones in Miami. Like the one he got to expierence first hand by the Miami driver passing and him getting a good look at what the heck the driver was doing. Come to find out the driver “was watching it on a video screen that had been installed where the visor
According to Stephanie Hanes in the essay “Texting While Driving Is as Dangerous as Drunk Driving,” a driver on a phone and those talking on a phone are four times likely to crash. This statistic shows how dangerous using the phone or even texting is while driving. As technology has increased, so has the use of cellphone. Distracted driving has caused an increase in car fatalities and disasters. However, distracted driving can be prevented if drivers take precautions, but no matter what we do, trouble will always be spelling on the road.
Distracted drivers in Illinois don’t perceive the dangerous of taking their eyes of the road. Distracted driving in Illinois is so dangerous because it takes a drivers attention away from the primary task of driving. One text message or Email is a distraction for a driver because their probably texting someone at the moment or are expecting a text from someone, and are eager to read the text message. “Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration tell that When texting, drivers took their eyes off the road for an average of 4.6 seconds” (Opposing Viewpoints). Talking your eyes of the road even for a minute is extremely dangerous, a fiasco can happen even if you’re driving around the neighborhood. Drivers think that they are perceived of everything while driving in a neighborhood, and no fiasco can happened. Some drivers are not perceive that young pedestrians (children) cross the streets without any reprimand, and if a driver at the moment is distracted a fiasco can occur. All distractions endanger driver, passenger, and bystander safety. Another way death can occur is in the expressway where millions of cars are driving through the expressway in a high speed lim...
“Have you ever noticed how anyone going slower than you is an idiot, and everyone going faster than you is a maniac?” George Carlin once, jokingly asked. However, this is not the case for drivers on the famous highway systems in Germany. When you drive in Germany you can be “idiot” in the government’s eyes if you go too slowly, drive in the wrong lane or impede the flow of traffic. This distinction is not unique in Germany but is applicable to their federal highway system, aptly named the Autobahn.
With the introduction of the automobile in the early 1900s, laws have been instituted to protect drivers on the road. With these laws come lawbreakers who put their agenda in front of the well being of others. Tens of thousands of lives have been lost. billions of dollars have been spent, and pollution has grown exponentially because of this. drivers travelling at high speeds on roads (Hartman).
These are all reasons that can lead to distracted driving. Star Tribune writes that there are too many motorists killed or injured on the road which is "a clearly preventable problem." By incorporating this specific detail, Star Tribune conveys how they want a change to happen. This establishes a concerned tone. The specific detail was not needed; however, the detail was incorporated to express the Star Tribune's apprehension towards distracted driving accidents. Star Tribune explains that a bill introduced by Republican lawmakers would make it illegal to use a handheld device while on the road. If the bill goes into effect, it would start as early as July "about half way through the busy summer driving season." Star Tribune integrates this specific detail into their editorial to again elucidate the trepidation they feel about car accidents. Summer is a busy season and the bill getting put in place would save numerous lives. Star Tribune also explains that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration created new guidelines which ask makers and developers of electric devices to design their products to cut back on distractions while driving. The modification would disable functions "such as playing videos, text entry or internet browsing" while the device is in moving vehicle. Star Tribune adds this specific detail to ponder some problems behind driving accidents. By acknowledging the problems, Star Tribune expresses why the bill needs to
In the book Drive by Daniel H. Pink his argument is how motivation 3.0 differs from motivation 2.0 and how there is type I behavior as well as type X behavior. Type I behavior was people with intrinsic motivation who did not look for rewards to complete their tasks or assignments. Type X behavior was people with extrinsic motivation who need a reward to complete what they are asked. Motivation 2.0 was an operating system that used the method of “carrots and sticks” to either promote good behavior or greater progress in businesses. Through this method people were offered a reward for completing their task or a punishment if they failed to complete it. At the beginning it worked well, but then our economy started changing
Just this past summer, one of my good friends was driving through Harrisonburg on his way home from work, when he noticed the one thing all drivers dread, flashing blue lights closing in on him fast. While pulling to the side of the road, he realized there was not one, but two police cars behind him. He knew he had only been going five miles per hour over the speed limit, so he was worried as to why two police cars had just pulled him over. After sitting in fear behind his wheel for several minutes, two cops walked to his car and informed him that he was getting a speeding ticket.
This means that the drivers are essentially driving around on the road blindly (“What” 1). Texting while driving causes 1,600,000 accidents per year, 333,000 injuries per year, and 11 teen deaths every day (“DWI” 1). Driving while intoxicated seems like the most significant cause of accidents, while on the road, however, texting while driving is much more hazardous. Texting while driving is about 6 times more likely to cause an accident than driving while intoxicated and is the same as driving after four beers (“DWI”
“The one thing that unites all human beings, regardless of age, gender, religion, economic status, or ethnic background, is that, deep down inside, we all believe that we are above-average drivers” -Dave Barry, comedian. The number of accidents over the last ten years have drastically increased, drivers are paying less attention to the road itself. Many individuals behind the wheel of a car believe that their driving does not affect the road conditions, however it always will. The driving habits of today are catastrophic due to the reasoning that the driving will affect other lives through reckless or distracted driving, and disobeying traffic laws.
Preview: To overcome aggressive driving we must first understand it. I would like to share with you the problem, the dangers and the solutions for this growing trend.