Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences topic for each
Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences topic for each
Importance of pragmatics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Multiple Intelligence Theory proposed by Gardner (1983) was a novel view to what was previously defined as IQ. In his theory Gardner stated that intelligence is not a single, fixed ability in mind which can be tested by IQ Test. He argued that IQ tests can only measure verbal, logical-mathematical and some spatial intelligence. He believed that there are many more other kinds of intelligence such as visual/spatial, bodily/kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal and naturalistic intelligences. Later on he suggested that there may be other intelligences as spiritual and existential. According to Gardner (1993), intelligences can be improved, modified, trained and even changed. Generally, human ability and intelligences are …show more content…
As these definitions indicate, pragmatics covers various features of interaction.
To be successful in this area of language use one needs to have developed pragmatic competence as speech acts, implicature , situational routines and politeness.
2. Review of Literature
2.1. Theoretical background
The theory of multiple intelligences was developed in 1983 by Dr. Howard Gardner, professor of education at Harvard University. It suggests that the traditional notion of intelligence, based on I.Q. testing, is far too limited. Instead, Dr. Gardner proposes eight different intelligences to account for a broader range of human potential in children and adults. These intelligences are:
• Linguistic intelligence ("word smart")
• Logical-mathematical intelligence ("number/reasoning smart")
• Spatial intelligence ("picture smart")
• Bodily-Kinesthetic intelligence ("body smart")
• Musical intelligence ("music smart")
• Interpersonal intelligence ("people
…show more content…
Crystal (1997 p.301) has defined pragmatics as the study of language from users’ viewpoints. In other words, pragmatics is the study of communicative action in its socio cultural context.
As it was mentioned in Introduction section pragmatic competence consists of different parts such as speech acts, implicature, situational routines and politeness.
Speech acts were introduced in the 1960’s and 1970’s by Austin and Searle who believed that language is not only used to say things but also, to perform actions (Austin 1975: 95-102).
Speech acts: The study of speaker meaning
According to Searle (1969) "Speech acts are the actions performed via utterances since they consist of “uttering words”, “referring and predicating”, “stating, questioning, commanding, promising, etc.”
Implicature : The study of how more gets communicated than is said
Pragmatics studies meaning in interaction so it is not only concerned about “what is said” but also “what is meant”.
Grice was the first to distinguish between “what is said” and “what is meant” in the 1950’s. Grice’s theory presents the notion of implicature, the conveyed meaning of the speaker (Grice 1975:
According to Howard Gardner (1991), every individual is born with a certain intelligence or potential intelligence. It is unfair to teach and/or assess an individual with a standard guideline or benchmark. This is mainly because every individual possess a different intellectual strength and different kinds of mind that learn, perform and understand in a different ways which is difficult to be changed. If an individual cannot understand the way we communicate, we should communicate in the way they can understand. Howard Gardner (1983), in his Multiple Intelligence Theory, proposes that human intelligence has seven dimensions that should be acknowledged and developed by the encouragement of learning and self-development and
Howard Gardner’s theory contains eight main multiple intelligence. As the years have progressed there have taken one out and is left with the main seven. These seven are: Linguistic, Mathematical, Spatial, bodily, Musical, Interpersonal, and Intrapersonal. These are found in everyone; however, each person will excel in one or two. Once teachers can determine what intelligence the students will exceed on and teach to their strengths the student will learn much more.
Joan Cutting claims that “Austin (1962) defined speech acts as the actions performed in saying something. Speech act theory said that the action performed when an utterance is produced can be analysed on three different levels” (fig. 2) (2002: 16)
Speech can simply be defined as the faculty or act of expressing or describing thoughts, feelings, or perceptions ...
Charles Spearman's model of intelligence and Howard Gardner's multiple intelligence theory are two of the most widely used theories of intelligence. In order to understand how similar the two theories are we must first understand their differences. These two men differed in opinion on how IQ and intelligence should be measured, and they differed in opinion on what made a person "smart". In order to examine these things they first had to understand the human brain and how it works. They had to examine the human study habits and rituals, along with the human test taking habits.
Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligence focuses more on how numerical expressions of human intelligence are not a full and accurate depiction of people’s abilities (McFarlane, 2011). He includes and describes eight intelligences that are based on skills and abilities that are valued within different cultures. The eight intelligences include visual-spatial (e.g. sailor navigating with no navigational systems), verbal-linguistic (e.g. poets, writers, orators, and communicators), bodily-kinesthetic (e.g. dancers, athletes, surgeons, craftspeople), logical-mathematical (e.g. mathematicians and logicians), interpersonal(e.g. salespeople, teachers, clinicians, politicians, and religious leaders), musical (e.g. musicians and
Communicative intentions and speech acts are related to the fact that an individual states a sentence, but that sentence has 2 or more several different meanings. The way the sentence is delivered, the tone used to deliver it and the entire body language is related to speech acts. In this paper, a particular scene will be discussed with regards to the participants’ communicative intentions and speech acts. The following scene will be discussed related to the communicative intentions and speech acts:
The theory behind multiple intelligence is that people display intelligence across a broad spectrum of areas: these areas are also completly independent of each other. (Grison, Sarah, Todd F. Heatherton, and Michael S. Gazzaniga. "Chapter 8." Psychology in Your Life. New York: W.W.Norton &,inc, 2015. 289+. Print.) It was proposed by Psycologist Howard Gardner of Harvard university. He was oppossed to the theory of general intelligence which states that if you do well in one field, such as math, you will do well in anouther: like English or Science. When testing for intelligence, general intelligence models will rely on a high score in one feild to determine a persons overall intelligence. While Multiple intelligence will test a person over
Pragmatics Aspects: Deixis and Distance, reference and inference, conversational implicature, anaphoric and cataphoric reference, presupposition, entailment, direct and indirect speech acts and speech events, cultural context and cross cultural pragmatics, conversational analysis and background knowledge, denotation and connotation meaning, the four maxims and hedges.
On this concern, one general classification system lists five types of functions performed by speech acts: declarations, representatives, expressives, directives and commissives. Declarations are those kinds of speech acts through which the speaker changes the world via words, as in the case of a priest uttering "I now pronounce you husband and wife. " As for representatives, they are those who state what the speaker believes to be the case or not. In using them, he/she makes words fit the world as in "the Earth is flat." In contrast, expressions are used to state what the speaker feels.
Pragmatics focuses on language use within a given social environment, analysing how people interpret the various meanings language conveys. Yet, miscommunication arises due to situational contexts and thus, pragmatists “focus on what is not explicitly stated”, instead emphasising “what is communicated by the manner and style of utterance” (Finch, 2000). Consider a sign saying “Garage sale.” Naturally, without further information, we understand that there is a sale within an individual’s garage, rather than actual garages being sold. The example highlights how pragmatics furthers the understanding of an interpretation that is found past the words. This deep-seated meaning is transparent not by the reason of the semantics of the words themselves, but due to the contextual knowledge that is widely known. Ultimately pragmatics is the study of the ambiguity of language, as it examines the multiple meanings each sentence may have, which may lead to confusion, conflict and ambiguity. Therefore a sound understanding of pragmatics, may lead to a reduction in conflicts betw...
Language is a means of human communication whether verbally or nonverbally. In everyday life we use language to express our thoughts, feelings ,attitudes,etc.A great amount of social interactions takes place every day over the telephone ,by online chats, face –to face interaction or at workplaces .We use language of different forms for different functions as in to inform, question , and sometimes to strengthen social relationships or just to keep the social wheels turning smoothly. Moreover, understanding one's own language and even other cultures’ language is important to arrive at a successful and effective communication with others . The study of language can be undertaken in various ways .Semantics and pragmatics are two branches of linguistics which are concerned with the study of meaning.
Howard Gardner, a professor at Harvard, introduced his theory of multiple intelligences in 1983. Multiple intelligence’s is a theory about the brain that says human beings are born with single intelligence that cannot be changed, and is measurable by a psychologist. Gardner believes that there are eight different intelligences in humans. The eight are verbal linguistic, visual spatial, bodily kinesthetic, mathematical logic, musical, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and naturalist. Understanding these intelligence’s will help us to design our classroom and curriculum in a way that will appeal to all of our students. We might also be able to curve discipline problems by reaching a student in a different way. One that will make more sense to them and more enjoyable. We can include all of the intelligences in lessons to accommodate all of the students’ different learning styles at once. By reaching each students intelligence we can assume that a student will perform better which, could mean students retaining more important information. A students learning style can also help lead them into a more appropriate career direction. As a teacher you can also learn your own personal learning style or intelligence to help improve the way you learn and teach.
I feel that obtaining good speech skills can be vital to resolving workplace issues. Becoming more direct and getting straight to the point with my speech has impacted my experiences in increase my ability of not losing my listeners interest and avoiding improper articulations by speaking or communicating clearly and effectively to obtain a good impression of his or her listener because a person only gets one time to make a first impression. We must understand the power of the tongue. Changing our words can change our situations.