Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Neoliberalism vs Keynesian economics
Neo realism vs liberalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Neoliberalism vs Keynesian economics
The primary objective of Dr. Crowley and Dr. Hodson was to primitively conduct an argument that explains how neoliberalism is present within the work force, as well as emphasize its importance in the economy and society. This argument is important because it directly addresses how government intervention eradicates improvement in a business. Such intervention can prevent loyalty amongst employees, job quality, productivity, and economic prosperity. The examples, evidence, or data used to support their argument incorporated case studies and data retrieved from an array of unidentified industries. Within the article, it states, “Thirty years of neoliberal orientation within organizational leadership may underwrite the observed secular trend
toward both increased conflict and greater abasement over time (Crowley and Hodson, 2015, 100).” The utilization of data and case studies shows how “neoliberal approaches to work organizations are associated with sharp declines in job quality and negative organizational outcomes (Crowley and Hodson, 2015, 102). They used their data to formulate how it would affect businesses in the future by mentioning how “neoliberalism doesn’t necessarily threaten organization survival, which increasingly turns on profits rather than productivity (Crowley and Hodson, 2015, 102).” The linkage between evidence and argument was convincing when they elaborated on the positive and negatives of neoliberalism. Early on in the article, they mentioned how “neoliberalism not only helped the success of the national economy, but also the organizational functioning and the quality of work life (Crowley and Hodson, 2015, 91).” Later on they refute their argument by clarifying “that neoliberalism isn’t equally beneficial to all member of an organization (Crowley and Hodson, 2015, 103).” By negating their statements shows how convincing their research was because they exposed the weaknesses of neoliberalism, but it was instrumental for Dr. Crowley to justify how “imposing a free market brings out favorable outcomes (Crowley, Martha 2015).
Moreover, the inflationary recession period deemed a “stagflation” was coupled with rising economic inequality as the top one percent of earners saw their income rise by 45.4 percent from 1977 to 1990. In Stud Terkel’s Working, this disparity is clear between boss and employee, as bosses such as Dave Bender feel uncomfortable in his status as a boss. Similarly, Larry Ross, ex-president of a conglomerate and consultant, describes the “lonely life of an executive”, who must now adhere to the computer and other technological phenomena that have made managing the workplace rather mechanic and demanding. The stress of cutting labor due to a new corporate model also fueled the restructuring of business to fit a profit-motivated, globalized economy. While many bosses were gaining employment, unions began to see their disunion due to the forces of automation and leaner corporate mechanisms. As Levinson writes, “traditional skills” became obsolete in the face of automation while many longshoreman, who were fathers, could not train and bring their sons up in the business because “the jobs were
...ith this next statement: "The flexible hybrid of Capitalism and the welfare state pioneered in the United States had proven capable of military triumph over Germany, Italy, and Japan. Despite widespread fears and dark prophecies that the depression would return once the war was over, the economy weathered the transition away from the controlled economy of wartime with relative ease." The businessmen of the time continued to fight for conservatism even when liberalism seemed to be at its finest. This quote from the author made the businessmen of the day to once again seem as of they were out of though with the majority of society and were only seeking what benefit them and their bank accounts.
Topic and Specific Case: The topic that I have chosen is the impact that the shift to neoliberal government policies has had on workers in Canada. I have chosen to explore this topic through looking at the restructuring of unemployment insurance in the 1990’s neoliberal era when it came to be called employment insurance (McBride, 2005, pg. 90).
Anthropocentrism has been a central belief upon which modern human society has been constructed. The current state of the world, particularly the aspects that are negative, are reflective of humans continuously acting in ways that are in the interest of our own species. As environmental issues have worsened in recent decades, a great number of environmentalists are turning away from anthropocentric viewpoints, and instead adopting more ecocentric philosophies. Although anthropocentrism seems to be decreasing in popularity due to a widespread shift in understanding the natural world, philosopher William Murdy puts forth the argument that anthropocentrism still has relevancy in the context of modern environmental thought. In the following essay, I will explain Murdy’s interpretation of anthropocentrism and why he believes it to be an acceptable point of
I agree with Strawson in saying that we are not truly morally responsible for what we do, in a mental respect at least. Though it suffers from many faults, there are also ways to even more clarify his argument, as I will hope to do so in the following. First off, Strawson states that for someone to be truly morally responsible, we have to understand the points that he has given. The first being that we do what we do because of the way we are. These just states that the things we do and decide are based upon how we are in that moment, in mental respects. For example, when it comes to choosing what to eat between options A or B, I will choose option A because of how I am. But if you were to choose, it would be dependent on the way that you are
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American
On December 2,2015 I went to to the Lynnhaven building to receive some feedback on my agreement paper for English 111. It was a very rainy day after running through the rain when I reached the writing center room. There was a yellow note saying that the writing center was in the student center until December 4,2015. After reading the note I ran back in the rain to my car.It was to cold to walk it was raining. As I approached the student center I was told by a security guard that the tutoring lab was located on the third floor. I had walked up three flights of stairs. When I had finally reached the third floor,I walk into the tutoring lab. There were about eight tables, but only four staff members and one student. Amen had approached me asking what did I need help with today. I replied saying that I would like some feedback on my paper for English. He then pointed to the writing table and said “she can assist you with your paper”.
Employment is hard to find and hard to keep and a job isn’t always what one hoped for. Sometimes jobs do not sufficiently support our lifestyles, and all too frequently we’re convinced that our boss’s real job is to make us miserable. However, every now and then there are reprieves such as company holiday parties or bonuses, raises, promotions and even a half hour or hour to eat lunch that allows escape from monotonous workloads. Aside from our complaints, employment today for majority of American’s isn’t totally dreadful, and there always lies opportunity for promotion. American’s did not always experience this reality in their work places though, and not long past are days of abysmal and disgusting work conditions. In 1906 Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” was published. His novel drastically transformed the way Americans felt about the unmitigated power corporations wielded in the ‘free’ market economy that was heavily propagandized at the turn of the century. Corporations do not have the same unscrupulous practices today because of actions taken by former President Theodore Roosevelt who felt deeply impacted by Sinclair’s famous novel. Back in early 1900’s in the meatpacking plants of Chicago the incarnation of greed ruled over the working man and dictated his role as a simple cog within an enormous insatiable industrial machine. Executives of the 1900’s meatpacking industry in Chicago, IL, conspired to work men to death, obliterate worker’s unions and lie to American citizens about what they were actually consuming in order to simply acquire more money.
In other words, neoliberalism has benefited few corporate elites, and harmed the lives of many local businesses, which has led to a dramatic increase in inequality, social polarization, and poverty.
The United States is the most developed capitalist economy in the world. The markets within the economy provide profit-motivated companies endless potential in the pursuance of pecuniary accumulation. Throughout the twentieth-century competitive companies have implemented modernized managerial procedures designed to raise profits by reducing unnecessary costs. These cost-saving procedures have had a substantial effect on society and particularly members of the working class. Managers and owners of these competitive and self-motivated companies have consistently worked throughout this century to exploit the most controllable component of the production process: the worker. The worker has been forced by the influence of powerful and affluent business owners to work in conditions hazardous to their well being in addition to preposterously menial compensation. It was the masterful manipulation of society and legislation through strategic objectives that the low-wage workers were coerced into this position of destitute. The strategies of the affluent fragment of society were conceived for the selfish purpose of monetary gain. The campaigns to augment the business position within the capitalist economy were designed to weaken organized labor, reduce corporate costs, gain legislative control and reduce international competition at the expense of the working class. The owners have gained and continue to gain considerable wealth from these strategies. To understand why the owners of the powerful companies operate in such a selfish manner, we must look at particular fundamentals of both capitalism and corporation strategy. Once these rudiments are understood, we ...
“Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe”( Douglass). This famous quote epitomizes the philosophies of Frederick Douglass, in which he wanted everyone to be treated with dignity; if everyone was not treated with equality, no one person or property would be safe harm. His experience as a house slave, field slave and ship builder gave him the knowledge to develop into a persuasive speaker and abolitionist. In his narrative, he makes key arguments to white abolitionist and Christians on why slavery should be abolished. The key arguments that Frederick Douglass tries to vindicate are that slavery denies slaves of their identity, slavery is also detrimental for the slave owner, and slavery is ungodly.
Throughout the 1970s, the ability of any one person to work hard enough to transcend social stratification in the United States became difficult due to various domestic challenges. The reality Americans begun to see during the ‘70s was bleak, this being contributed in great part to ecopolitical events. In the year 1974, a recession begun that has continued to affect the United States economy to this very day. Harold Meyerson, a writer and journalist for the Washington Post and The American Prospect in the article “The 40-Year Slump” notes “The middle-income jobs of the nation’s postwar boom years have disproportionately vanished. Low-wage jobs have disproportionately burgeoned. Employment has become less secure. Benefits have been cut. The dictionary definition of “layoff” has changed, from denoting a temporary severance from one’s job to denoting a permanent severance” (1). It is important to consider this point because it really lays the foundation of the 1970’s; one of little hope, and one shaken by what became known as the 1973-1975 Recession. This recession affected practically every person living in the U.S, and changed the perception of the workplace. Through low-economic growth and high inflation, the economic term “stagflation” came about, and negatively influenced the success of countless Americans. Alejandro Reuss, co-editor for the magazine Dollars & Sense in the article “That ‘70s Crises” asserts "The economy seemed trapped in the new nightmare of “stagflation,” so called because it combined low economic growth and high unemployment (“stagnation”) with high rates of inflation” (1). This is a valuable point to consider, as this term is still used to this day, and has affected all aspects of life for many Americans. Mic...
An author should always know the purpose of what he is writing as well as who he is writing to. This is important because it shapes and determines what writing style the author should use. If the writer does not determine his or hers purpose and audience, the author could fail at getting his or hers point across to the reader. This could be because the paper does not have a main focus or the writing is too high or low educationally for the reader. Charles Colson is the author of "Beware of the Easter Bunny". Charles Colson converted to Christianity when he was serving his prison term for the Watergate scandal. Charles Colson started Prison Fellowship to help minister to prison inmates after personally converting to Christianity himself. Colson successfully encourage his readers to rethink the Easter Bunny by using logos,
The disparities between the two views of the economy lead to very different policies that have produced contradictory results. The Keynesian theory presents the rational of structuralism as the basis of economic decisions and provides support for government involvement to maintain high levels of employment. The argument runs that people make decisions based on their environments and when investment falls due to structural change, the economy suffers from a recession. The government must act against this movement and increase the level of employment by fiscal injections and training of the labour force. In fact, the government should itself increase hiring in crown corporations. In contrast the Neoliberal theory attributes the self-interest of individuals as the determinant of the level of employment.
With globalization, there is intensified economic competition on a worldwide scale. Corporations have to conduct their operations more viably and feasibly in order to not lose out to their competitors. There is a push for operations on a free market premise where the value of an organization is placed in its ability to produce, compete and profit from its operations, bringing forth the emergence of neoliberalism. There is hence an emphasis on cross-border exchanges due to free trade. In addition, neoliberalism had perpetuated the notion of rationality, where its principles guide the behaviors of individuals and a person’s credentials legitimizes the position he or she holds in the organization. Neoliberalism delivers the importance of a knowledge economy and the focus on human capital due to the economic shift to service sectors (Powell & Snellman, 2004). HRM has an imperative capacity in attracting, directing, retaining, maintaining and developing this human