Many people argue whether society’s lack of parenting classes and programs are to blame for teen crime or if a child is born with the nature to be bad. Evidence from the article Invest in Parents to Help Fight Crime specifies that the societal lack of parenting classes and programs are to blame for teen crime. Dr. Harvey Armstrong is an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto. Based on the Nature vs Nurture debate, Dr. Armstrong’s position in this article plays on the Nurture side. Dr. Armstrong believes that parents do not discipline their children correctly. This includes parents not using punishment to correct their child’s disobedience. He also believes that effective parenting is the most important factor in raising …show more content…
Harvey Armstrong believes that parents do not correctly discipline their child. They do not practice or train their children to obey rules or a code of behavior, not either use punishment to correct their disobedience. The reason of this may incudes numerous possibilities. One of the reasons to why parents do not properly discipline is because many parents have experienced emotional, physical, or sexual abuse as children and are afraid to set limits (Armstrong, 2006). Since they are afraid to set limits, it is causing their children to be disobedient. Another reason can also be because parents fail to maintain intergenerational boundaries. For instance, they are unable to set boundaries by responding “No” and incapable to endure their children responses to know (Armstrong, 2006 p1). When parents are incapable of setting certain boundaries for their children, it leads to the parent lacking discipline. Consequently, parents should correctly express discipline to their child by using punishment to correct their behavior as well as setting reasonable boundaries. This will result in the child learning and will be less likely to repeat the action. Furthermore, this argument also supports the Nurture side on the Nature vs Nurture debate. Nurture also refers to your childhood. In this case, the parents childhood is effected by the child’s because some parents have been abused when they were young, and are afraid to set effective limits, which results in …show more content…
Armstrong explains in the article that effective parenting is the most important factor in rising socialized children into adulthood. As mentioned earlier, parents do not discipline their children correctly. Children who do not receive effective limits from parents exhibit more violence in adolescence. This may include children to be out-of-control, unresponsive to their therapeutic interventions and severe school problems (Armstrong, 2006 p1). Children can be out-of -controlled by the use guns and knife to intimidate their parents, siblings, and others (Armstong, 2006). Also, if parents are not effect it could lead to school problems. Statistics in the article showed “35% dropped out of school, 10% have assaulted their parents and peers, 12% live away from home and 2 out of 5 demonstrate behavioral problems at school” (Armstrong, 2006, p.1). Moreover, this argument of Dr. Armstrong also supports the Nurture side on the Nature vs Nurture debate. Nurture refers to the behavior and development connected to environmental experiences. A child will grow up from the environmental experiences he or she had gone through. Since children grow and develop from what they learn from there parents, there parents should set an robust example. Thus, effective parenting is the most important factor in raising socialized children into adulthood. If the parent is not being effective, it may exhibit more violence in
...s may never agree on a conclusive degree to which both nature and nurture play roles in human development, but over the years, more improved studies have shown that both are crucial aspects. With all the knowledge we are gaining from these studies, it would be quite limiting to believe that a criminal and his actions are the sole result of heredity. Even in people who do not commit crimes, genes themselves are affected by the prenatal environment. Undoubtedly, the fetus experiences changes in environment, forcing possible changes in heredity and reactionary response. We are likely to never find the answer to how much or how little either, nature or nurture, impacts our lives, but at least we can agree that they both do, in fact, have major roles. Our development is not the culmination of heredity alone, but of a tangled web of experiences and genetics entwined.
Children who are under the influence of parental guidance tend to have better behavior and can distinguish between right and wrong. “Children placed in situations lacking parental guidance are six times as likely than those with parental guidance to have a high level of overall difficulties including, emotional issues, conduct disorders, and peer problems” (McGuire 2014). Children do not have to worry about the weight of responsibility because their parents take on that responsibility for them. Kids brought up in normal, loving environments behave in a more civilized manner and exhibit better etiquette than those who are placed in negative, harsh environments such as...
The nature vs. nurture controversy is an age old question in the scientific and psychological world with both camps having evidence to support their theories. The controversy lies in which is more influential in the development of human beings. While there is no definitive answer for this, it is interesting to look at each of them separately.
This style of parenting is best described as the child having more control over the parent. There are a lot of parents today that seem to have no control of their child actions and even words. This in which can make the parents question what are they doing wrong when it comes to raising their child. This type of parent have very low demands and are highly responsive, maybe even too responsive to the child’s needs. Although these parents are very loving of their children they do not have many rules that their child should abide by (Cherry, K. 2017, para.1). Not setting ground rules gives the child the freedom to do whatever they want and know that they will not receive a harsh, if any punishment at all. Also, parents who are permissive tend to want to be their child’s best friend. The child in this parent in child relationship tends to have more control than the parent. If there are not any rules in place to be followed the child will eventually resort to negative behaviors, and may even be insure because of the low discipline from their parents (Cherry, K. 2017, para. 9). Permissive parents should give the child rules to follow and discipline them if broken, to ensure that their child follow the right path throughout
and behavior of the child. In fact, the more we understand about development and behavior, the better. the more obvious it becomes that nature and nurture are similarly influences. rather than determinants, not only singly but also in combination. Here below, I will endeavour to expose the leading theories dealing with the question of nature.
I believe that a child’s growth is developmental, and each child needs a secure caring and motivating atmosphere in which to grow and developed emotionally, intellectually, physically, and socially. I believe nature and nurture are the two aspects that influence in child development. Nature and nurture are different in several ways, but they both play an important role in child development. I believe that the environment that a person grows up in has the most influence on child development because children reflect what they are taught and what they learn from the people around them.
Nature versus nurture is an argument in psychology over whether a person’s innate qualities and behaviors are caused from their environment or if they’re born with it. Vygotsky places more emphasis on the social factors that contribute to cognitive development, in other words he is in favor of the nurture argument. He believes that everyone learns from their culture, environment, and social interactions. He talks about a few of his theories like the zone of proximal development, and a more knowledgeable other. He also expresses his thoughts on developmental tools and the importance of language to cognitive development. All of these factors together support his idea that children’s behavior is learned.
It can be said for most parents that they want their children to grow up to be successful contributing members of society. Being a parent is a difficult, yet rewarding task. But why do some types of parenting result in juvenile delinquency while others find success. There are four generally recognized parenting styles and are categorized: authoritarian, permissive, neglectful, and authoritative. This essay will break down the various styles, its type(s) of discipline and effectiveness.
(Sigelman and Rider 2014) Individuals who support the nature theory believe that the genes passed on from the parents to the child dictates the path in which they will grow and learn. On the nurture side of the debate are those who emphasize change in response to environment. All the external physical and social conditions, stimuli, and events that can affect us. (Sigelman and Rider 2014) Individuals who support the nurture theory argue that an individual’s experiences shape their development, behavior, and
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
In this essay, it will focus on nature and nurture and how it determines human behaviour and the environment they live in. The nature versus nurture is debate is one of the oldest in the history of psychology. It will discuss how personal behaviour affect human beings. It will be based on (Watson, 1924) he said "give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in
Nature by itself can affect a child’s development. If the child is born with a disease or mental illness, they may develop at a slower pace. For example, if a child is born with Asperger’s syndrome, the child will have a difficult time with social skills and understanding emotions. Nurture deals with the environment. If a child was raised in a hostile environment, that child is more likely to be hostile when they get older. Environment may play a larger role in most cases due to everyday lifestyle, from the city you live in to the way you are raised. If one was raised in a healthy house hold, someone who lived in a toxic household may behave differently.
One of the most critical aspects of raising a child is the way they are disciplined. Disciplining a child starts early in their life and how it is done sets an example for them of how to respond to undesirable behaviors. Everyone’s parenting style differs, but the majority fall into four major categories: Authoritarian, Authoritative, Neglectful, and Indulgent. Electing a parenting style is hard and in most cases, the chosen or natural parenting style is based on the effects of the parenting style the parent experienced when they were young.
Parenthood is a huge factor in any child’s life, If you were to ask me, a parent decides who we are without either the child or the adult knowing it. The parent’s role also requires discipline, and this is where things get rough in parenting, as so I’ve been told. When the child is disciplined enough and in the right way, they are willing to pass this wisdom on to their children in the future. But when a child is discipl...
For instance, parents need to feel in control and see their form of discipline is taking effect that exact moment. However, if adults focus on results rather than addressing the issue, they are ultimately setting their children up for failure. “Punishment usually stops misbehavior immediately, however, the long-term results are negative because we are often fooled by immediate results” (Nelson, 13). Furthermore, this could be the reason why punishment is so popular amongst parents because it’s almost immediate response to misbehavior and the authoritative power it holds. According to Nelson, punishment is used by adults because it’s easier, they know how to punish, or do not know what else to do. (22). As a society, people usually take the easiest alternative to accomplish a task but it may not always be the better, smarter, or more efficient alternative. Furthermore, when people do not know what to do, they stick to what they do know. However, parents need to think of the long-term consequences and take the time, effort and skills to use effective discipline. (22).