Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is injustice in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is injustice in literature
In the play Doubt, by John Patrick Shanly, Sister Aloysius is treating Father Flynn unfairly. Sister Aloysius is the principal of St. Nichols School, who is suspicious and always doubt everyone, especially Father Flynn. She thinks that Father Flynn is guilty, but has no proof. Sister Aloysius doesn’t like Father Flynn in the school and his ideas. She treats him unfairly. Sister Aloysius treats Father Flynn unfairly when she still accuses Father Flynn of giving the altar wine to Donald Muller after Father Flynn tells her the truth. She treats him unfairly by forcing him to request the transfer without proving if Father Flynn is guilty or not and also makes him resign by lying about his past.
First, Sister Aloysius accuses Father Flynn that he gave a wine to Donald Muller. In the play, when Father Flynn and Sister James are at Sister Aloysius’s office, Sister Aloysius tells Father Flynn that “there was alcohol on [Donald Muller’s] breath” (Shanly 33) and Sister James “did smell it on his breath” (33). After that, Father Flynn tells her the truth that “Mr. McGinn caught [Donald Muller] in the sacristy drinking alter wine” (33) and Donald Muller begged Father Flynn “not to be removed from the altar boys” (34). Father Flynn tells her that he was with Donald Muller in the rectory because he was scared that he will be removed from the altar boys because Mr. McGinn caught him drinking wine. After Father Flynn tells the truth Sister Aloysius still has doubt that he is lying and so she wonders if “it’s easier to believe him?” (35). Moreover she’s not satisfied with Father Flynn’s story, so now she’s going to “corroborate [Father Flynn’s] story with Mr. McGinn” (35) to confirm if Father Flynn is telling the truth. Sister Aloysius doesn’t as...
... middle of paper ...
...unfairly by bringing up his past and lying that she has called the last parish.
Finally, Sister Aloysius never proved that Father Flynn is guilty and accuses him without any proof. Sister James asks Sister Aloysius that if she “ever prove it [to]… [Her] self?” (57) And Sister Aloysius tells her “no” (57). Sister Aloysius never proved that Father Flynn is guilty, but she tells Sister James that she “was sure” (57) that Father Flynn is guilty of giving the altar wine to Donald Muller. She makes Father Flynn resign from the school by lying about his past. Sister Aloysius demanded the truth of what happened in the rectory and Father Flynn told her that Donald Muller was with him in the rectory to tell him not to be removed from the altar boys because Donald Muller was caught drinking the altar wine. After telling her the truth she still looks at Father Flynn as guilty.
The play “Doubt” by John Patrick Shanley began with a sermon by Father Brendan Flynn, a well liked and enlightened neighborhood priest, who says, "Doubt can be a bond as powerful and sustaining as certainty". (Shanley 6) Sister Aloysius Beauvier is a strict traditional nun, who was declared to protect and secure St. Nicholas Church School. Father Flynn seems to be the protagonist in the play and Sister Aloysius is the antagonist. The whole play, sister Aloysius Beauvier suspected Father Flynn of molesting a 12-year-old boy named Donald Muller, who is the first African-American student in the St. Nicholas Church School. I think that Sister Aloysius’s overreacting, because Father Flynn is innocent. In the middle of these two characters, Sister James is a young and innocent teacher who wants to be neutral between the conflict of Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn.
Another scene I believe is important that is missing from the play is the scene where sister James sees Father Flynn putting the white t-shirt back in the locker which is pivotal to the whole premise of the story, without Sister James seeing that she would have never brought it up to Sister Alyosius and we would been left to question Sister Alysosius’s accusations even more.
... Nonetheless, the signs also point to Father Flynn hurting him, because he was violating him. People’s assumptions are based upon personal experience and gut feeling, also on their upbringing; nature and nurture. Shanley uses inference in this play to create doubt in the audience’s minds'. The verdict is never in, on Flynn; guilty or not guilty. Shanley’s audience is left to be the jury.
Throughout the play, Sister Aloysius contradicts herself in her statements, demonstrating that an audience can’t know what she is thinking. When she first brings up the subject of Donald Muller, Aloysius tells Father Flynn that they “must neither hide Donald Muller, nor put him forward,” in other words, they must treat him differently from the other students (Shanley 30). Yet, when Flynn mentions that he was giving Muller special protections, she insists that Muller “must be held to the same
...’ accusations/suspicions. Sister Aloysius holds power in title only, for her authority within the church is diminished when her male colleagues come into play.
Arthur Birling is a man who is very big headed and unworthy. On the other hand, Abigail Williams is a vengeful, selfish, and a manipulative young lady, both these characters share a similarity, which is that they fail to admit their wrongdoings and keep secrets for the sake of their reputation, as he doesn’t want it to be ruined. Mr Birling cared most about his reputation, as he only cared about protecting his company and doesn’t see what he has done wrong, we know this as in the text it says “But I’d a special reason for not wanting any public scandal”. Through the play his selfishness gets the better of him, he is only worried about the public scandal and accuses Sheila of disloyalty, we know this because in the text is says “If you’d had any sense of loyalty” and he also wants to hide the fact that Eric stole the money as he said “I’ve got to cover this up as soon as I can” this shows that he is very keen on keeping his reputation in the public. For Abigail Williams, she believes she’s got a good reputation and she wants to keep it that way, we know this as in the text it says “My name is good in the village! I will not have it said my name is soiled...” Abigail is a mean and vindictive person who always wants her way, no matter who she hurts. She began to accuse the townspeople of
Distinctively visual language and cinematic techniques highlight to the responder the particular literal and metaphorical experiences characters are faced with, within a text. Peter Goldsworthy’s novel Maestro, Don McLean’s song ‘Vincent’ and the intriguing film Australia by Baz Luhrrman, explore the ways in which the human experiences of an individual’s connection to landscape is fundamental in shaping one’s sense of identity, personal growth and development. Composers further explore the realisation that our lives can be enriched by an understanding and appreciation of art as well as a deeper understanding of the importance of love and lust. The depiction of characters is conveyed through distinctively visual images to highlight the subsequent development of courage and resilience leads responders to a deeper understanding of how human experiences can create a sense of individuality.
Without finding any evidence to prove her allegations are true against Father Flynn, Sister Aloysius pursues her beliefs. She speaks with Father Flynn saying “You will request a transfer from this parish. You will take a leave of absence until it is granted.” (Shanley 49). By saying this Father Flynn is in fear of his reputation and has nowhere to go to as he tries to convince her to give him mercy. “Please! Are we people? Am I a person flesh and blood like you? Even if you feel certainty, it is an emotion and not a fact”
Inexplicable evidence suggests that Rose did indeed perform this act of treason; however, I as the reader know that she did not commit this crime, and am left to predict the outcome. I don’t foresee Rose dying any time in the near future. I can logically say this because she’s the protagonist of the novel, and there is still an entire book left. On another note, her father insists that she won’t even go to trial: “‘This hearing wasn’t even important,’ Abe said evasively. “‘What happens next is.’ ‘And what is that exactly?’ He gave me that dark, sly gaze again. ‘Nothing you need to worry about yet’” (Mead 488). Knowing the characters and the author like I do, it’s easy to infer that Abe definitely has concocted a plan to ensure the safety of Rose. Not to mention that Rose had just received a letter from her so-called “victim”, Queen Tatiana herself. The letter announced that Tatiana had foreseen her own death, and entrusted Rose with a mission to find Lissa’s unknown half brother or sister. By doing this, Lissa receiving her rightful place on the Council will be inevitable. Furthermore, the fate of Rose may not be as bleak as it seems at the end of the
...der further than what we have in front of us. We want to impose our opinion on everything. We want to relate to it in a way that can only be done through out imagination. So, due to this, when we are not given the flexibility, then the context no longer becomes entertaining. The viewers do not want to be told how to think. Given these points, if they are influenced to believe that Sister Aloysius is a cruel individual like the movie portrays, then at the end of the movie and book when Sister Aloysius says, “ I have doubts! I have such doubts!” they will take that as a confession from her, and be further lead to believe that the accusations against Father Flynn are false. I think John Patrick Shanley chooses specific diction to create a conflict that has no precise resolution,he wanted the reader get lost in story and enter into their own story manifested within.
Who wants to kill them but is stopped by Juliet’s father. During the course of the party
During this meeting Sister Aloysius started asking Father about his relationship with Donald and Flynn says at first that he does not feel comfortable: “Well. I feel a little uncomfortable. [To which Sister Aloysius asks] Why? [Father replies with] Why do you think? Something about your tone” (Shanley 32). This is showing that Father Flynn is not wanting to talk about his relationship with Donald and that he could be hiding something that he does not want to get out. It could be as bad as having made sexual advances on Donald or as small, but still bad, as giving him the altar wine he was caught drinking. Either way it is still incriminating evidence against Flynn. Flynn does not just mention Aloysius’s tone once though, he mentions it a couple more times during the meeting and also tries to sidestep the Sister’s questions. When Sister Aloysius asks him what happened in the rectory Father Flynn replies with: “I don’t wish to continue this conversation at all further. And if you are dissatisfied with that, I suggest you speak to Monsignor Benedict…” (Shanley 33). This is showing that Flynn is trying everything he can to not talk about his conversation with Donald in the rectory in fear of being caught. He also mentions that Sister Aloysius go speak with the Monsignor if she is dissatisfied which she is trying not to. She chooses not to do this because she knows that if she does he will just ask Father Flynn and believe whatever he tells him. A common argument that people might give is that he could just be following his priestly duties by not saying anything and that he has nothing to hide, well I think
Do not end up in situations that can be avoided. Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a novel set on a tropical island, explores the idea of mind control. In this story there are a group of schoolboys that get into a plane crash and are left without adults. As adolescents they decide who gets the power to be leader and out of them. Ralph is picked because of his appearance. Throughout the book a character Jack abuses his power and then because his influence on the others it leads to the death of two schoolboys. In Lord of the Flies Golding’s point is to demonstrate that people react to bad stimulus without realizing it,which results in an emotional breakdown.
To obtain and understanding of the current state of American Architecture and its development, we must first briefly establish the origin of architecture in America. Much of the 17th-century English colonial architecture resembled late medieval forms that had survived throughout much of rural England. The first American architecture houses were built in a wide range of sizes, gables, and overhangs. They also had a lack of symmetry that was reflected in the late medieval style throughout Europe. However, unlike rural England’s architecture, in Virginia and Maryland; brick construction and a symmetrical facade were preferred for one story homes. Upon the idea of domestic homes, cities began to be founded in the 17th century. Cities such as Boston, were chaotic in plan and with the turn of the 18th century, colonies began to take on a more permanent role, often establishing individual character. Newly founded cities, such as: Williamsburg, Virginia; Annapolis, Maryland, and especially Philadelphia began to be laid out in a logical organization of regular grids. This eluded planners in London during the same period and thus the diverse seed of American architecture was planned. Continuing the development of unique American architecture, American in the early 1890s began to value their own heritage and architectural language featuring larger neighborhood tracts. In the 19th century, the Colonial Revival style took a more eclectic style, and columns were often seen.
The Nurse has been alongside Juliet since the day she was born. She is always there for Juliet and provides her with emotional stability. She wants Juliet to be happy and when she hears about Romeo she is happy for Juliet. However, once things get very intense betw...