Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on gender biases
Opinions about double standards
Opinions about double standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I am a hypocrite. I judge people, but I don’t like my peers to judge me. That just makes me human. As an average teen, fitting in means everything. At school, each classmate is like a judge, determining which person is “right” and “wrong.” An example is chess and sports. There is a stigma about both; like how chess is for the nerds and the geeks while sports is for the jocks. When in fact, this is untrue. Two of my friend plays chess, but do not fit the stigma. They also play sports. They are considered “popular” from my peers. However, are judged by others. Double standard is wrong: in simple term, is defined as “a situation in which two people, groups, etc., are treated very differently from each other in a way that is unfair to one of them”(Merriam-Webster). Imagine double …show more content…
As reported by Simon McCormack, an article writer for the Huffington Post- men have a sixty-three percent higher sentences than women. Also, “females arrested for a crime are also significantly more likely to avoid charges and convictions entirely, and twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted”(McCormack). A double standard that women are ”innocent” has been letting female criminal avoid punishment(McCormack). Statistically, men are likely to have a longer sentence, while women have little or no sentence. Rape cases is a prime example of the statistic. For instance, a former teacher from Prince Albert, Bonnie McLachlan. She ”was found guilty of sexually exploiting a 15-year old” and sentenced no jail time, but an eighteen months house arrest(Kingston). Men and boys who were sexually exploited or raped were seen as a minor problem. Again, the double standard of women being ”innocent” are not punishing women like Bonnie. Gender double standard in the justice system is forming unfair ruling and sexist
This essay will explore reasons why females such as Vanessa George turn to the crime of sex offending. Demonstrating my knowledge and understanding of classical criminological theory, exploring biological theories such as penis envy and more contemporary views such as liberation theory within feminism. The essay will then go on to look at the inequalities female sex offenders face within the criminal justice system in comparison with males, using chivalry theory and evil woman theory to explain this.
Embry, R., & Lyons, P. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 146-162.
My opinion on male vs. female offenders is that they should both get the same amount of time if the crime is the same. I think men and women that create violent and nonviolent crimes should be treated equally. Male offenders are no different than female offenders so why treat them differently. They are both criminals whether they committed the same crime or if they created different crimes.
Studies dating back to 1993 show that this has been true for over twenty years. More recent studies show that this disparity is still occurring today. We continue to see males incarcerated more often and for longer terms when compared to females. There are those who argue that gender disparity does not take into account legal characteristics such as criminal history and offense severity. However, studies have been conducted that do in fact take control for those factors. The same outcome is reached. Even with legal characteristics considered, female offenders are less likely to be incarcerated compared to male offenders. Theories have been developed as an attempt to explain why this disparity occurs. Some tend to favor the chivalry/paternalism thesis while others favor the focal concerns perspective. Either way, gender disparity is occurring with no legally relevant reason to explain it. The federal sentencing guidelines were developed in order to prevent disparity from occurring. However, we see that judges still tend to consider extralegal factors when sentencing. It is important that the criminal justice system follow the guidelines set in place so that all cases are sentenced in an equal and fair
He claimed that the statistics seriously under-estimated the extent of female criminality. From an examination of official figures in a number of different countries he claimed to have identified certain crimes that are usually committed by women but are particularly likely to be unreported. Pollak went on to give reasons as to why there should be an under-recording of female crime. 1. He argues that the police, magistrates and other law enforcement officials tend to be men.
The violation of both cultural and gendered norms, results in women offenders to be labelled as mad, bad, or sad, and as the sexualised female offender, masculinised female offender, mad female offender, and the victimised female offender, by the criminal justice system and society to explain their criminality (Weare, 2013). The case studies of Tania Witika, Macsyna King and sex workers in New Zealand demonstrates how discrimination can impact upon women’s experience within the criminal justice system, as stereotypes determines which kinds of women are more likely to be arrested, found guilty, imprisoned or referred for psychiatric treatment (Carraine et al., 2012).
Some of these demographic variables that can affect the level of punitiveness are age, sex, education and demographic location. Most of the studies include sex as a variable in their study, some say that men are more punitive than female (Sprott, 1999) meanwhile others would say males are more punitive than women (Cohn, et.al,. 1991). Furthermore, there are also other studies who include sex as their variable but unable to compare men and women in their punitive attitudes (Mackey & Courtright, 2000). In addition, Hurwitz and Smithey (1998) conducted a study on gender differences on crime and punishment. In general, they discovered those females are more supportive in crime prevention policies like drug rehabilitation and spending more money on job rehabilitation programs. On the findings of Langworthy and Whitehead (1986) about sex in relation to punitiveness, women are less punitive because they tend to support social programs that the government is spending but they are more punitive if they worry about being a crime victim. On the other hand, female students support harsher punishments like criminal suffering and death penalty (Tsoudis, 2000). Still, additional research can be conducted to determine the relationship of male and female students towards criminal
In addition, these findings link with the notions of domination of women by men, in that there are establishments within a society that reproduce gender in a variety of ways (Kimmel & Holler, 2011, p. 15), such as the business relationship between a man and a prostitute.
The daunting task of violating a social norm, something that I could be ostracized and ridiculed for, I still chose to do. Social norms are the rules of behavior that are considered acceptable in a group or society. Doing weird things in public while surrounded by strangers is a recipe for disaster, especially for somebody like myself. I am awkward and have plenty of trouble talking to new people. Most of us are told not to talk to strangers when we are younger because there are all sorts of crazy people out there. There could not be a better way to break out of my shell and violate a social norm than to sit down and talk to total strangers while they eat.
First, Chesney-Lind points out that research on female offenders in general is lacking, and that victimization plays a key role in the offending of women. "…Responses must address a world that has been unfair to women and especially those of color and pover...
Gender effects on sentencing are not direct but move through the use of differences in gender in offending behaviour and through individual histories of women that see a more prominent extent of women preceding the court with a group of the combination of attributes that makes authentic moderating circumstances. These components in turn prompt the inconsistencies that are found in the sentencing outcomes for both genders. These disparities are as a result of gender characteristics and differences associated with feminism and not as a result of being female.
Americans think that they have come a long way since a gap of equality between men and women existed. Because of this progress, many people make the assumption that there is no inequality left in the United States and women have the same opportunities as men. Yes, it is true that the American society has come from one of inequality to that one that is more equal. Yes Americans have come a long way, but unfortunately women are still not equal to their male counterparts. This inequality towards women is evident within several different aspects in life, ranging from politics, gender roles, marriage, society as a whole and, especially, women in the Police Force. The history of women in the criminal justice system as police officers has been governed by one widely held stereotype: that being a police officer is only a man’s job.
While all feminist theorists share a common focus on gender inequality, there are differing views on the source of the problem and the ultimate solution. Liberal Feminists Freda Adler and Rita argued that sociological factors, not physiology, best explain women’s criminality. There is a strong relationship between women’s emancipation and the increase in female crime rates. As women become more liberated and become more involved in full time jobs, they are more likely to engage in the types of crime that men commit. Thrasher, a leading exponent of the social disorganization perspective, felt that girls and women committed less crime because they were more closely supervised by boys and men. These arguments lacked any factual support.
Generally, prison sentences for men are longer than they are for women, even if they have committed the same crime (Kindlon et al). “How many guys do I know who have broken hands from punching inanimate objects?” Eighteen-year-old Walt, a teen from a suburb in New England, puts it (Pollack et al).
“Fair isn’t when everyone gets the same thing; it’s when everyone gets what they need. This quote is something I strongly agree with. It states that equality is not always fair,