Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study ; behavioral finance
Behavioral finance quiz
Case study ; behavioral finance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case study ; behavioral finance
Introduction
This essay will focus on behavioral bias and evaluate the bubble and market crash in its psychological aspects. One of a famous bubble was the dot.com bubble with throughout this essay, stock market trends to begin and end with periods of frenzied buying (bubbles) or selling (crashes). The herding behavior that irrational and driven by emotion and influenced the dot com bubble and burst. This essay will expected to I, explore difference phrase of Dot.com bubble and crash in which behavioral and psychological, ii, and explore how information cascades lead to herding, confirmation bias, and overconfidence in unjustified stock valuations and how this occurred in the Dot.com Bubble and Crash.
Literature review of behavioral finance
…show more content…
Social influence may mean following a leader, reacting simultaneously and identically with other investors in response to new information, or imitation of others who are either directly observed or observed indirectly through the media. Social influence appears to be strongest when an individual feels uncertain and finds no directly applicable earlier personal experience.
As Hirshleifer (2001) points out, people have a tendency to conform to the judgments and behaviors of others. People may follow others without any may stampede. Shiller (2000) said that the meaning of apparent reason. Such behavior results in a form of herding, which helps to explain the development of bubbles and crashes. If there is a uniformity of view concerning the direction of a market, the result is likely to be a movement of the market in that direction. Furthermore, the herd may stampede. Shiller (2000) said that the meaning of herd behavior is that investors tend to do as other investors do. They imitate the behavior of others and disregard their own
…show more content…
As the enthusiastic and social mood had slow down, the market trends turn around, those psychological based bias such herding, confirmation bias and over reaction act oppositely. It lead the technology market declined rapidly and eventually crashed.
According to Pepper and Oliver ‘a long period of rising prices is associated with an accumulation of investors who need to sell (since their holdings of money are less than the desired levels). Such investors may delay asset sales while prices continue to rise. A continuing rise in prices is likely to attract speculative investors who do not plan to hold the investments for the long term; Pepper and Oliver refer to their investments as being loosely held. A long period of rising prices would lead to many investors needing to sell shares in order to raise money for other purposes, and to many speculators with loosely held shares. When the expectation of price rises disappears, both groups of investors will sell. Share prices fall sharply’.
It is consistent to figure 1, Chart of NASDAQ closing values from 1994 to 2008. The shape depress on NASDAQ index during late 2000 to
In October 1929, the United States stock market crashed due to panic selling. This crash started a rippling effect that contributed to a world wide economic crisis called the Great Depression. This crash was such a shock because of the economic expansion of the 1920’s when the Dow Jones average reached an all time high of three hundred eighty one. The year 1928 was a time of optimism and the stock market had become a place where everyday people truly believed that they could become rich. People everywhere were talking about the market and newspapers were reporting stories of ordinary people such as chauffeurs, maids, and teachers making millions off the stock market. People who didn’t have the money bought on margin. The stock market was booming and the excitement about the market caused a lot of over speculation. People ignored the small signs of the impending crash until Black Thursday, October 24, 1929. Four days later the stock market fell again.
During the 1920's, the North American economy was roaring, but this decade would eventually be put to a stop. In October of 1929, the stock market began its steepest decline to this date in history. Many stock market traders and economists believe and pray that it was a one-shot episode never to be repeated. On the other hand, many financial analysts and other economists believe that the current stock markets are in place to repeat the calamitous errors of the 1920's. In this paper, I will analyze the causes of the crash and discuss the possibilities of it re-occurring.
In an era of superficial prosperity and indulgence, most Americans “threw all care to the wind” (Danzer, Klor de Alva, Krieger, Wilson, Woloch). Ron Chernow observed that “in the 1920s you could buy stocks on margin. You could put 10 percent down and borrow the rest against your stocks.” Buying on margin is exactly what reflected the American public of the 20s- reckless and optimistic. By using leverage to invest, buyers can maximize their profits through the stock in a bull market ("Buying Stock on Margin"). This idea of using brokers’ money to gain profit for themselves appealed to many Americans. The great bull market that had lasted for six years further instigated irrational exuberance- or the extreme confidence in investors that they overlooked the degrading economic fundamentals- in the American public (Shiller). However, this overvaluation proved to be deadly. Margin loan, like a double-edged sword, eventually stabbed Americans in the back- and stabbed them hard. The
It is often said that perception outweighs reality and that is often the view of the stock market. News that a certain stock may be on the rise can set off a buying spree, while a tip that one may be on decline might entice people to sell. The fact that no one really knows what is going to happen one way or the other is inconsequential. John Kenneth Galbraith uses the concept of speculation as a major theme in his book The Great Crash 1929. Galbraith’s portrayal of the market before the crash focuses largely on massive speculation of overvalued stocks which were inevitably going to topple and take the wealth of the shareholders down with it. After all, the prices could not continue to go up forever. Widespread speculation was no doubt a major player in the crash, but many other factors were in play as well. While the speculation argument has some merit, the reasons for the collapse and its lasting effects had many moving parts that cannot be explained so simply.
The United States signaled a new era after the end of World War I. It was an era of hopefulness when many people invested their money that was under the mattresses at home or in the bank into the stock market. People migrated to the prosperous cities with the hopes of finding much better life. In the 1920s, the stock market reputation did not appear to be a risky investment, until 1929.First noticeable in 1925, the stock market prices began to rise as more people invested their money. During 1925 and 1926, the stock prices vacillated but in 1927, it had an upward trend. The stock market boom had started by 1928. The stock market was no longer a long-term investment because the boom changed the investor’s way of thinking (“The Stock Market Crash of 1929”). The Stock Market Crash of 1929 was a mass hysteria because of people investing without any prior knowledge and the after effects that eventually led to the Great Depression.
In early 1928 the Dow Jones Average went from a low of 191 early in the year, to a high of 300 in December of 1928 and peaked at 381 in September of 1929. (1929…) It was anticipated that the increases in earnings and dividends would continue. (1929…) The price to earnings ratings rose from 10 to 12 to 20 and higher for the market’s favorite stocks. (1929…) Observers believed that stock market prices in the first 6 months of 1929 were high, while others saw them to be cheap. (1929…) On October 3rd, the Dow Jones Average began to drop, declining through the week of October 14th. (1929…)
“There were no smiles. There were no tears either. Just the camaraderie of fellow-sufferers. Everybody wanted to tell his neighbor how much he had lost. Nobody wanted to listen. It was too repetitious a tale” (The New York Times, World History Book). The stock market crash was only one of many contributions leading up to the Great Depression. There were many economic and societal conditions that worsened throughout this time. Luckily there have been documentaries on the life that was lived by the people and how they got through it, just like the character in the movie Cinderella Man, Jim Braddock. Millions of Americans and even people across the globe were hit and somewhat effected by this tragic period in history.
Cialdini, Robert B, & Trost, Melanie R. (1998). Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity, & Compliance. Interpersonal Phenomena. Retrieved from: angel.elmira.edu/section/default.asp?id=w114_PSY3010_01.
As the market was crowded with inexperienced but feverishly eager investors who lacked capital reserves, the falling prices produced a shock effect...
This essay concerns social influence in general. Aspects of social influence as such as majority influence and minority influence will be discussed in terms of their underlying psychological processes and how they differ. Majority influence or conformity refers to the desire to belong or to fit in within a particular group which involves adopting certain attributes, behaviour and attitudes of a particular group. As a result individuals consequently experience group pressure (in Baron, Branscombe & Byrne 2008). Minority influence on the other hand, refers to the influence that the minority exert over the majority in that the majority come to accept the beliefs and behaviours of a minority (in Baron et al. 2008).
Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions, Journal of Finance, 53, No. 1. 6, pp. 58-78. 1839 - 1885 - 1885. i.e. a. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.
We analyzed the market for two weeks to determine when the equity market would turn from a bearish to bullish market. Without a change in the market and a declining bond price, we decided to invest in equities according to our investment strategy, which brought us into the second phase of our portfolio. Therefore, at the beginning of February we bought shares in Sirius, Microsoft, Neon, Washington Mutual, and Nike. As assumed, the equity market continued to plummet decreasing the value of all our stocks except for our Gold Corporation stock.
Chapter 11 closes our discussion with several insights into the efficient market theory. There have been many attempts to discredit the random walk theory, but none of the theories hold against empirical evidence. Any pattern that is noticed by investors will disappear as investors try to exploit it and the valuation methods of growth rate are far too difficult to predict. As we said before the random walk concludes that no patterns exist in the market, pricing is accurate and all information available is already incorporated into the stock price. Therefore the market is efficient. Even if errors do occur in short-run pricing, they will correct themselves in the long run. The random walk suggest that short-term prices cannot be predicted and to buy stocks for the long run. Malkiel concludes the best way to consistently be profitable is to buy and hold a broad based market index fund. As the market rises so will the investors returns since historically the market continues to rise as a whole.
There is a lot of research work going on in this particular field, more so since the crisis of 2008. The purpose of this article was to make readers aware of the subject .Behavioral finance is an interesting mix of logics, psychology and economics. Budding investors and management students should look into this in more detail so that they are better equipped to make financial decisions.
Social influence is one person’s (or group’s) influence on another. The Holocaust is an "extreme form of physical destruction and can be considered the ultimate degree of social influence ." Groups are defined as two or more participants. Groups can be powerful forces shaping our feelings, judgments and behaviors (Baron, Kerr, & Miller, 1992). Cohesion of a group effects the group functioning by...