Doodle’s Brother, Guilty or Innocent?
Doodle’s brother guilty or innocent you ask? Well let see here hmmm… GUILTY, GUILTY, and umm oh yea GUILTY! I mean helllloooo he's so guilty you couldn't even give evidence that he's not , I mean sure he might have said he loved his brother but would someone who loves their brother say that they were going to kill him? Let me teach you something I call it “Lying” and “lying” is where someone says one thing but never does it, I wonder where you might find that… oh yea DOODLE’S BROTHER. By now you’re probably saying something like smart like “Oh yea then he could oh lied about killing his brother than huu.” but sorry for I have evidence to prove that that wasn't a lie.
For example on page 354 Doodle’s brother states and I quote “I began to make plans to kill Doodle by smothering him with a pillow”. That itself should enough evidence to prove he’s guilty but to prove he’s not lying look on page 345 when Doodle’s brother quite clearly
…show more content…
states that he was a burden in many ways, this not only shows why Doodle’s brother hated Doodle and wanted to kill him but also shows that he did not want to put up with a brother that might have not been you know ‘all there’. There my friends are two pieces of proof that Doodle’s brother did in fact kill his brother. If you still say that Doodle’s brother is innocent then check out page what Doodle’s brother said on page 345 when Doodle’s brother states “A long list of don'ts went along with Doodle, all of which I ignored when we got out of the house” this shows that he mistreated Doodle, a.k.a he tried to kill his brother; The evidence is right there in front of you and if you still think that Doodle’s brother is innocent than here something that you can't deny and will surely change your mind about it.
On page 350 Doodle’s brother actually tries to kill Doodle “One day I took him up to the barn loft and showed him his casket… it was covered with a film of paris green, sprinkled to kill rats.’It’s not mine’ replied Doodle.’I want you to touch it’ Demanded Doodle’s brother. ‘I won’t touch it’. Exclaimed Doodle. ‘ You WILL touch it, or i'm not letting you down’. Threatened Doodle’s brother.” There you have it, there's the proof that Doodle’s brother not only threatened Doodle but also attempted to kill
him. I can see where someone might think that Doodle’s brother is innocent because he claimed Doodle “licked” him or you might think why would he spend so much time to train him, but the fact is that he was just embarrassed to have a weaker brother than most and did not want to be made fun of and after he failed he took the opportunity of the storm and Doodle being worn out and unable to move to kill his brother. Doodle’s brother is in fact guilty of the crime of murdering his brother William Armstrong also known as Doodle I conclude that where some might think that Doodle’s brother is innocent because of some mesley lies with no ground bases or proof of his love for his brother Doodle, but the cold hard truth remains that Doodle’s brother did infact not only make threats and attempts to kill his brother but actually did it, Doodle’s brother is in fact guilty for the murder of William Armstrong (a.k.a) “Doodle”.
Judge Dee disguised himself as an itinerant physician and later on as a silk merchant in order to apprehend the double murdered Shao Lee-huai in “The Double Murder at Dawn” case. Judge Dee was also very diligent with the documentations and procedures for his cases. In “The Strange Corpse” case for example, he “had the necessary documents relating to the exhumation filled out” (76). Additionally, Judge Dee also made sure the information he received was as accurate as possible. For example, the grave digger that indicated which one was Bee Hsun’s grave had to impress his thumbmark on a document: “testifying that this is indeed Bee Hsun’s grave. Should there be a mistake, then you will have to bear the consequences” (69). Judge Dee drew up reports of the events that transpired during his investigations to his superiors. Moreover, if the judge believed he made a mistake, he would report it. In “The Strange Corpse” case for example, Judge Dee “described in full detail how he had committed the crime of desecrating a grave, and recommended himself for appropriate punishment” (79). Judge Dee wrote this because he genuinely believed he made a mistake. He believed he had slander an innocent woman and had desecrated Bee Hsun’s body after the autopsy failed to reveal how he
In “Westbury Court,” author Edwidge Danticat tells the readers about how one drastic event in her childhood can completely change her whole life. Danticat grew up in an apartment in a seemingly unprivileged area called Westbury Court in Brooklyn, New York. One day after school, she came home with her younger brother and immediately turned on the television to watch her favorite show. Suddenly, she and her show were interrupted by an abrupt knock on the apartment’s door. Apparently, there was a deadly fire coming from the apartment across from theirs. By then, Danticat realizes the importance of the phrase that her mother told her after the tragedy, “Sometimes
of killing him he tried to find some way of saying that he was not guilty. He
On Bloodsworth’s appeal he argued several points. First he argued that there was not sufficient evidence to tie Bloodsworth to the crime. The courts ruled that the ruling stand on the grounds that the witness evidence was enough for reasonable doubt that the c...
This is another way he is guilty. Brother decides to teach Doodle to walk, because they are both getting older, "When Doodle was five years old, I was embarrassed at having a brother of that age who couldn't walk, so I sat out to teach him." (597). With Doodle not being able to walk still, but so close to starting school it scared his Brother. It scared him, because he didn't want to be teased because of his brother's condition. He thought he would teach him even though the doctors told him and his family that Doodle couldn't learn to walk, because it can be mentally and physically harming for
Brother is too engulfed in his selfish desire for a ‘better’ brother that he does not give Doodle a chance to rest. “I made him swim until he turned blue, and row until he couldn’t lift an oar.” This excerpt shows the reader how ruthless Brother is in the training he has set up for Doodle. Brother appears to care more about him being capable of doing these ‘fun’ things than his brother having fun doing them does. “Success lay at the end of the summer like a pot of gold” When Brother says this, he relays how he is greedy for a better brother and will do anything to get what he wants.
``In criminal law, confession evidence is a prosecutor’s most potent weapon’’ (Kassin, 1997)—“the ‘queen of proofs’ in the law” (Brooks, 2000). Regardless of when in the legal process they occur, statements of confession often provide the most incriminating form of evidence and have been shown to significantly increase the rate of conviction. Legal scholars even argue that a defendant’s confession may be the sole piece of evidence considered during a trial and often guides jurors’ perception of the case (McCormick, 1972). The admission of a false confession can be the deciding point between a suspect’s freedom and their death sentence. To this end, research and analysis of the false confessions-filled Norfolk Four case reveals the drastic and controversial measures that the prosecuting team will take to provoke a confession, be it true or false.
The novel Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer has a very in-depth conflict that is showcased all throughout the novel. In Theo's community, there is a high-profile murder trial about to begin. Mr. Pete Duffy, a wealthy business man, is accused of murdering his wife Myra Duffy. The prosecutors have the idea that Mr. Duffy did it for the one million dollar insurance policy he took out on his wife earlier, however they have no proof to support this accusation (Grisham 53). The defendants do however have the proof that no one saw the murder, for all everyone knew, Mr. Duffy was playing his daily round of golf at the golf course right by his house. As the trial moved on, the jury was starting to lean towards letting Mr. Duffy walk a free man. To this point, there has been no proof to support the prosecutors statements that Mr. Duffy killed h...
Doodle's brother was never able to accept him for who he was. Even very early in the story, shortly after Doodle was born. His brother's unhappiness with Doodle was mostly because he wanted a brother with whom he could play and run. The thought of a brother who could barely move and probably never walk was embarrassing. He even states that Doodle, "....
In “The Scarlet Ibis” by James Hurst, Doodle is an intelligent character. William “Doodle” Armstrong is a character who everybody thought was going to die. However, when Doodle lives on to see another day, he learns of the incredible world that his mind, but not necessarily his body, would be able to experience. Doodle’s first signs of intelligence is shown when the narrator describes his responsiveness. Doodle was able to respond to his name, and when he began to talk, he “talked so much that [they] all quit listening to what he said” (556). This description of Doodle’s earlier life shows his above-average intelligence because it emphasizes the extraordinary mental actions that Doodle was capable of, as opposed to what his physical well-being
In conclusion Doodle was not normal, he was weak but he was strong minded and tried to stay positive most of the time. His brother is helping him try to be normal by teaching him how to walk and crawl. Doodle cannot do most of the time normal people do he cannot run or have adventures. He is scared to be alone and doesn’t want his brother to leave his
...verything” (Hurst 1). The brother only cared about himself and having fun, and did not think about the affect his actions had on Doodle. The brother decides to “teach him [Doodle] to run, to swim, to climb trees, and to fight” (Hurst 3). Readers can begin to infer that the brother’s careless actions will later lead to serious injury or the death of Doodle.
During the novel, Chris states that a murder is commonly committed by a member of your own family. By stating facts and using statistics, the reader believes that it is possible Mr Shears committed the murder. “5. If it was c) I only knew one person who didn’t like Mrs Shears, and that was Mr Shears who knew Wellington very well indeed.” chapter sixty-seven, page fifty-four. In this quote, our protagonist explains to the reader why he believes Mr Shears may have murdered the dog, he does this by stating facts which forces the reader to believe Chris and consider Chris as a reliable source. During the novel the reader is not given any direct clues to any other suspects and follows along and agrees with Chris’ actions and beliefs. One way the author shows this is by making Chris keep investigating Mr Shears and trying to find evidence to prove him guilty. “This meant that Mr Shears was my Prime Suspect.” chapter sixty-seven, page fifty-four. This quote directly states who the suspect is and this short, direct sentence motivates the reader to agree and continue to believe everything the narrator states. With all things considered, Mr Shears did not commit the crime and his intention in the novel was to mislead the reader as well as the young
All of this evidence is true. I’m giving you all the facts about the night Bob was murdered, proving Johnny Cade guilty. Especially since Bob never even touched Johnny or Ponyboy. With all these reasons, Johnny Cade should be convicted of
When Doodle was up on the loft looking at a casket, his brother explained to him