In her article on Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, Joanne Woolway explores a different interpretation of it, introducing the idea that while events of The Crucible parallels with Miller’s then events and how it criticizes them, it also introduces Miller’s criticism on society’s standards - raising “political questions which are valued in a range of social, cultural, and historical contexts” (132). She begins the article with a quote by Robert A. Martin on the uniqueness of a play, then argues that he is wrong and is misleading. Woolway goes on to explain the relevance The Crucible’s themes had on modern audiences in the production of the play in 1996, how its themes portrayed the problems of religious bigotry, mob mentalities, and communities …show more content…
destroyed by false accusations of child abuse. She talks about the parallels between The Crucible and recent cases in the U.S.
and Britain, such as scenes of mass hysteria, the rate of how fast rumors spread, and inability to stop accusations that have already started. Woolway uses these parallels and themes explored in The Crucible to connect back to the Puritan faith and human nature to explain that it is not a criticism on the communist “witch hunts” in the 1950’s, but rather one of religion and sexuality. Using Miller’s character, Abigail, as an example of a victim to the Puritan’s incredibly strict traditions, Woolway goes into depth on Abigail’s descent into her mischievous pleasure due to her parents’ deaths and forced abstinence by the Puritan faith. She then talks about how collective accusations in a community is incredibly detrimental and is caused by the freedoms allowed by excessive prohibition and social acceptance. Woolway concludes her article, stating that Miller’s views on society and religion is a timeless one that does not only apply to the Salem witches trials, but also to society and humanity itself. She finishes, implying that both the film and play asks the audience to look into themselves for the faults that the characters in The Crucible
have. The thing that I found interesting about Woolway’s article is how she wrote her introduction. I don’t think I have yet written an essay that began with a quote, and then going on to argue against it, while providing enough of my own ideas for the thesis. I myself thought that the introduction would be a generic one that starts off with a quote where the author would continue off on the quote, but was thoroughly surprised when she disproves the quote. Being able to catch the reader off guard is a powerful way to hook them in. The thing that I found most surprising in the article was how she pieced and flowed her paragraphs together, how she went on from one topic, then going onto the next while explaining their significances. Not often did I find myself confused or wanting a more in-depth explanation of her analyses, which I definitely would like to incorporate into my future works. Her article was definitely PEA formatted, except her paragraphs were more fragmented rather than explicitly having five paragraphs, which I have honestly never really thought about implementing into my works. The benefit of studying and reading criticism such as Woolway’s on The Crucible is to be able to develop more techniques on critiquing and be exposed to different works whilst growing as a writer overall.
The focus of Miller’s The Crucible is an appalling witch trial that morfs the once-peaceful town of Salem into a cutthroat slaughterhouse. As a lucrative playwright and a not-so-subtle allegory author, Miller is a seasoned wordsmith who addresses people akin to himself, and is not secretive about that information. The Crucible best serves its purpose as a learning device and a social statement, especially at the time of its publishing. Miller‘s piece showcases the appeals in an easy-to-identify manner that is perfect for middle or high school students who are new to the appeals, or for English majors who have no problem pinpointing them, making this play ideal for a classroom setting.
The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, was written during the early 1950s.It was the time of The rise of Senator Joseph McCarthy’s.All throughout history, accusations of witchcraft have been used as an excuse for the discrimination of people who cultures, traditions, race, and ideas were not easily accepted nor understood by the society even if it was untrue.In today’s society students are taught this because it show’s how important “The Crucible, and McCarthyism were and what changes they went through because of the human condition.It is extremely important and appropriate because it allows students the opportunity to respond in terms of their own experiences .The Salem Witch Trials and McCarthyism had many similarities. In The Crucible Abigail
In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, Miller demonstrated that it was Abigail William’s flaws – mendacity, lust, and arrogance – that led her to be responsible the most for the tragedy of the witch hunt in Salem, Massachusetts. Driven by lust, Abigail was able to lie to the Salem community in hopes of covering her and her friends’ deeds and gaining the attention of John Proctor. Her arrogance enabled her t0 advance her deceit.
Many of the characters in Arthur Miller's The Crucible have specific human flaws that cause the tragedy of the Salem Witch Trials. The Salem villagers exhibit failings, including greed, vengeance, and fear, which eventually lead to the downfall of their town. Many villagers, especially Abigail Williams, take advantage of the opportunity to seek vengeance on others through the trials. Greed for power and land often holds precedence when the hysteria takes over. Fear of being arrested or put to death is the key motivation in turning others in as witches. From these three human flaws, the town of Salem falls into chaos with many innocent people paying the price.
The statement,“The Crucible is essentially about courage, weakness, and truth,” is proven true numerous times, throughout the play. The Crucible was written by Arthur Miller, about the true events that happened in Salem, Massachusetts, between the years 1692 and 1693. The Salem witch trials consisted of many hangings, lies, and complete mass hysteria. The citizens of Salem followed the religion of Puritanism, and the ideas of predestination. The root of the mass hysteria comes from their belief in the sense that in something happens then it must have been planned by God. In Miller’s portrayal of the story, Abigail Williams was the ringleader of the witch trials, and she used the idea of predestination to cover up her own sins. Abigail was a very manipulative girl and ruined many lives. John Proctor, Mary Warren, and Elizabeth Proctor were just a few of the victims in Abby’s game. John, Mary, and Elizabeth exhibit the traits courage, weakness, and truth, whether it was in a positive or negative way.
The Crucible: Hysteria and Injustice Thesis Statement: The purpose is to educate and display to the reader the hysteria and injustice that can come from a group of people that thinks it's doing the "right" thing for society in relation to The Crucible by Arthur Miller. I. Introduction: The play is based on the real life witch hunts that occurred in the late 1600's in Salem, Massachusetts. It shows the people's fear of what they felt was the Devil's work and shows how a small group of powerful people wrongly accused and killed many people out of this fear and ignorance.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a play that discusses many issues and spurs contemplation within the reader. While reading this play, because of the controversy of many issues detailed within, it is difficult for one not to take a look at one’s own morals and determine what one would do if placed in a similar situation. The key issues discussed within this play, the effects of hysteria, marital betrayal, and the murderous powers of lies, are portrayed intriguingly and effectively. The lessons that can be learned from The Crucible are still quite applicable today.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
In The Crucible, the members of the Salem community accept the lies that their neighbors are taking apart of witchcraft as the truth. The lies and deceit in the community help attribute to the play’s overall theme of hysteria. The theme of hysteria is prevalent throughout the play, as the belief that witchcraft is occurring in the town enables members of the community to believe that their neighbors have committed devilish acts. As the town descends into a hysterical climate, members of the community take advantage of the situation to act upon any long-held grudges or repressed sentiment. Characters, such as Abigail, use both lies and hysteria to seek revenge and gain power. This reveals that the lies and deceit told throughout the play drive
The Crucible is a 1953 play by Arthur Miller. Initially, it was known as The Chronicles of Sarah Good. The Crucible was set in the Puritan town of Salem, Massachusetts. It talks of McCarthyism that happened in the late 1600’s whereby the general public and people like Arthur Miller were tried and persecuted. The Crucible exemplifies persecutions during the Salem Witch Trials. The people were convicted and hung without any tangible proof of committing any crime. Persecutions were the order of the day. When a finger was pointed at any individual as a witch, the Deputy Governor Danforth never looked for evidence against them or evidence that incriminated them; he ordered them to be hanged. This can be seen through his words “Hang them high over the town! Who weeps for those, weeps for corruption!” (1273), the people were persecuted aimlessly. The four main characters in the play, John Proctor, Abigail Adams, Reverend Hale and Reverend Parris, are caught in the middle of the witchcraft panic in the religious Salem, Massachusetts in late 1690’s. Persecution is the most important theme in the Crucible, the leaders and citizens of Salem attacks and persecutes one of their own without any tangible evidence against them.
True catalysts of chaos in The Crucible are those cunning enough to break their moral ties to Puritanism to avoid the destructive punishments of a puritanical society. Abigail, “the prime mover of the Salem hysteria” (Martin), is a complex character who demonstrates her ability to manipulate beliefs and evade punishment for breaking the Puritan moral code; her role in The Crucible is a petri dish for lies and abundant fear. Early on, Abigail’s opposition to Puritan fundamentals is revealed through a short lived affair with a married man, John Proctor. She continuously “imagines herself in the arms of Proctor” (Bigsby) and “had felt him 'burning ' in his loneliness’” (Bigsby), a frame of mind which is still intact
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a play that was first performed in 1953 in the United States of America in the midst of the persecution of alleged communists during the era of McCarthyism. Although the play explicitly addresses the Salem which hunt, many find that the play is an analogy to McCarthyism due to the striking similarities in which the people behaved. Miller highlight the different groups of characters in order to reveal overlying ideas of the play such as: Self preservation, power, and hypocrisy.
The Crucible by Arthur Miller is a highly complex tragedy about the Salem witch trials of 1692. According to Aristotle, “ tragedy is an action that is serious, complete, and of certain magnitude; with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such emotions” (qtd. in Bowers). The Crucible fills all these elements; it is an imitation of the serious witch trials that took place during the 1600s, and it arouses pity for the characters. John Proctor, the protagonist, is an example of one to be pitted. He battled with his guilt over his affair with Abigail and ended the relationship. In the story, whenever Abigail came near, he completely rejected her despite her continued advances. Abigail went as far as implicating Elizabeth in order to return to John’s bed. John, the true tragic hero, confessed and apologized to Elizabeth and the town even though it put him at great risk. The whole witch hunt began with John’s affair with Abigail and all her lies. And resulted in the death of many innocent people. Families, friends, and neighbors who were once close to ...
When Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953, America was in a state of unrest. Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee were spreading fear and hysteria with their Communist “witch hunts.” Miller wanted to address the subject in a way that would not blatantly denounce the hearings, and with his previous knowledge of the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692, he created an allegory, and The Crucible was born. By examining the universality of the theme of the play and its tragic elements, it will be apparent that The Crucible is Arthur Miller’s greatest achievement.
Throughout history literature has been a tool for mirroring, or contrasting present day society. It has been prevalent that literature be used in such a way, in order to create a better self awareness of the people in a society. With just the right amount of extreme portrayals, to the subtle, but intriguing criticisms found within a book’s cover, it enables readers in the multitude to understand how societies throughout the generations are all in some way connected. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, we can see how Miller creates this connection. He creates a world that seems far fetched, absurd. A world that really indeed existed in the late 1800’s. A world that oddly enough, is still not that far off from our own.