Donald J. Trump, whose presidential campaign has doused the Republican Party with the verbal equivalent of napalm, has escalated his rhetoric to new levels of intensity before the crucial South Carolina primary this week. It is a vote that, if he wins, could erode the prospects of Republican leaders’ stopping his candidacy.
During the Republican debate in South Carolina over the weekend, Mr. Trump condemned former President George W. Bush in acid terms, saying his administration had lied about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. “They lied,” Mr. Trump said — words that even two Democratic presidential nominees declined to use about Mr. Bush and the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and that were more akin to what the rabble-rouser liberal
…show more content…
filmmaker Michael Moore has said. But Mr. Trump did not stop there: He shredded Mr. Bush as a poor leader who let the World Trade Center come down during his watch. In the process, Mr. Trump both challenged Republican orthodoxy and picked at old, sensitive scabs within the party over the war, all in the final days of the primary campaign in a military-heavy state that has been instrumental to the success of the most dominant family in Republican politics for the last 25 years. If Mr. Trump wins the primary on Saturday, as every public poll shows him on track to do, it will be after reverting to the storm-the-gates populism that led to his political rise and refusing to back down amid criticism. But his remarks in the debate were a gamble a week from when voters head to the polls, and raised the stakes if he wins: The Republican Party’s eventual nominee could be someone who has been taunting its leaders for months. And Mr. Bush is planning to campaign in South Carolina on Monday for his brother Jeb Bush, who has repeatedly invoked his family as the primary vote approaches, and who appeared to get under Mr. Trump’s skin during the debate. Also on Monday, Mr. Trump has scheduled a rare news conference in South Carolina, as rival campaigns tried to make sense of a multi-candidate battlefield at the debate. However late he began doing it, Jeb Bush has been the only candidate who has consistently taken on Mr. Trump. In a Sunday afternoon email to supporters, Mr. Bush pressed the case he’ll make over the next week. The subject line said, “Donald crossed a line.” In a round of interviews and on the Sunday morning programs, Mr. Trump, who has spent the entire campaign defying predictions that his comments would come back to bite him, responded to questions about his comments in the debate with an across-the-board “I don’t care.” He dismissed complaints that he had gone too far, or that his remarks could hurt him in a state where the former president remains highly popular. “If it does, it does — I have to tell the truth,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with The New York Times. “I could be very quiet,” he added.
“I could say, ‘Oh, that’s wonderful,’ or I could say, ‘Excuse me, the World Trade Center'” came down during Mr. Bush’s tenure.
Mr. Trump headed into the final week in South Carolina with a crescendo of orthodoxy-challenging pronouncements, including criticism of the home-state Senator Lindsey Graham. He also defended his previous comments about the work of Planned Parenthood, saying during the debate, when challenged by Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, that he did not approve of abortion but that the organization did “wonderful work” for women’s health more broadly. That remark could be toxic for Republican primary voters; it had made its way into an ad from Mr. Cruz by late Sunday afternoon.
Mr. Trump’s comments about the former president overshadowed those about Planned Parenthood. But even some former advisers to George Bush did not believe that the remarks about the Iraq war and the World Trade Center would do much damage to Mr.
…show more content…
Trump. “Overwhelmingly, most Republicans disagree with his criticisms of George W.
Bush, but most Republicans also don’t want to debate” Mr. Bush’s legacy, said Steve Schmidt, a Republican strategist who was a top adviser to Mr. Bush’s 2004 campaign.
Most people share Mr. Trump’s view that the war was a mistake, Mr. Schmidt added, and in a state heavy with military members, many families have grown weary of repeated deployments.
Tony Fabrizio, a Republican pollster who advised Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky’s presidential campaign, also saw little peril for Mr. Trump, even if one of his opponents puts the remark into a television or radio ad.
“It could potentially bring down his margin, but when you’ve got a guy who wins by double digits, does it matter?” Mr. Fabrizio said.
For Mr. Trump, standing by even his contentious comments has been a hallmark of his appeal.
“What the electorate’s been responding to is strength,” Mr. Schmidt said. “Mr. Trump once again last night showed what many Republican voters will regard as strength.”
More problematic for Mr. Trump, Mr. Fabrizio said, could be his Planned Parenthood
comments. Mr. Trump made noises before the Iowa caucuses about being a “healer” and aligning with the Republican establishment. In a crucial debate in New Hampshire, his approach was to avoid torching his opponents for the most part. But when he had a dust-up with Mr. Bush during the final debate in New Hampshire and the audience booed Mr. Trump, he made the most of it, saying they were against him because they were major donors and he could not be controlled. He has since used that line repeatedly on the campaign trail, even singling out Mr. Bush’s finance chairman, the billionaire Woody Johnson, as an example of the type of donor who is working against Mr. Trump — never mind that Mr. Trump and Mr. Johnson are actually friends. When the crowd at the South Carolina debate on Saturday night also began to boo, Mr. Trump again sought to use it to his advantage, saying, “I only tell the truth, lobbyists!” At another point, he criticized Mr. Graham for polling poorly in his presidential race. And he said Mr. Cruz was “the single biggest liar” — something that would have been seen as indecorous in previous campaigns, but that channels the anger voters feel toward elected officials. That coarsening of the language in the campaign, Mr. Schmidt argued, reflects the toxic culture of social media, and such behavior is no longer considered as much of a risk. Mr. Trump’s comments about both George Bush and Planned Parenthood are likely to stick to him well beyond the vote in South Carolina, in other primaries. But as for South Carolina, even those who would like to see him disappear from the race struggled to suggest that, after so many predictions of his demise, his latest comment would be the one to prove debilitating. While his margin of victory might be diminished, some operatives suggested, as long as there are multiple candidates, Mr. Trump will continue to amass delegates and roll toward the convention in Cleveland. “Accusing President Bush of lying about the war adds to the hard cap of Trump’s ceiling,” said Rob Stutzman, a California-based Republican strategist and a supporter of Jeb Bush. “But I don’t think it matters until this is a two-man or three-man race.” Trygve Olson, who also advised Mr. Paul’s campaign, said, “Conventional wisdom would say Trump should end up paying a high price for his thermonuclear gambit on the debate stage, his attack on President Bush and his positions that are totally incongruent with the vast majority of conservative voters.” But he was reluctant to embrace that wisdom. “I personally think he will pay a price,” Mr. Olson said, “but given how this cycle is unfolding with regards to Trump, the reality is it is difficult, if not impossible, to say that will be the case.”
On the brink of two different wars, two United States’ Presidents rose up to the challenge of calming the American people and fighting for the belief of justice. A day after devastation on December 7, 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt gives his “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation”. At the beginning of a terrorist crisis in 2001, George W. Bush announces a “‘War on Terror’ Declaration”. Both Presidents have many similarities in common, yet their differences set them apart with uniqueness. These two speeches, separate by nearly sixty years, weave an outright and assertive tone into their diction and detail.
Golden, A. L. (2001). Disputed ballots, partisan conflict, and constitutional uncertainty: The election of 2000 in historical context. The American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2252-2268. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214769221?accountid=45049
“President’s Address to Nation/” The Fifth Anniversary of September 11, 2001. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of 11 September 2006. http://whiteshouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060911-3.html. Reporters Without Borders. Press release: Worldwide Press Freedom Index, 2007.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair delivered speeches shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York and the Pentagon in Virginia, which occurred on September 11, 2001. The Former President George W Bush utilized pathos, anaphora, and personification in his speech to convey an optimistic tone. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, addressing the same topic, utilized mild invective and parallel structure to express an affirmative tone.
It all happened in an instant. One minute thousands of civilians were on their way to work when everything changed. President George Bush gave an iconic speech that was not only memorable but gave hope to the Americans that justice would be served to those associated with the terrorist group al-Qaida. George Bush’s speech rallied the Americans to fight back against the terrorists because he used rhetorical devices such as parallelism, analogies, and repetition.
Bush’s method of topic by topic argument along with many emotional appeals was a rather effective way of winning the audience’s support. By appealing to the emotions of the audience Bush was able to give the audience issues they could relate to as well as issues they would feel strongly about. With an emotionally involved audience Bush was able to gather a great number of supporters of his party, just as he intended in his original purpose. The further reference to the character of the people involved in the issues really paid off by drawing the crowd closer to the people working for them. With the topical structure and the appeals used, the speech was a very effective tool in gaining support for the Republican Party from the northern Arizonan audience.
A substantial amount of individuals believe that the government should defund Planned Parenthood. The claims made against the organization include; The Planned Parenthood Action Fund endorsed Barack Obama in his 2012 election as a “champion for women’s health.” Many believe that it was wrong for them to endorse a presidential candidate, because they had only done it three times before. Planned Parenthood is seen as being wealthy; their revenue has gone over their expenses by $90 million. Planned Parenthood has been accused of fraud of over eight million dollars of
Today’s leading news stories range from sports to overseas affairs, and from these Americans must decide what is important to our nation. Governor George W. Bush tries to make this decision a little easier in his announcement of candidacy on June 12, 1999 in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Like most candidates in an election, Bush’s main purpose is to present his ideas to a large audience and convince them that he is the man that can change the presidency. Governor Bush offers his opinion on free trade, our current military power, and drawing a moral line in politics. Bush speaks elegantly to his intended audience, which consists of his loyal supporters and those interested in changing America’s political scene with a “compassionate president.” At the same time he tends to exclude people who haven’t kept up with his agenda or that are not in the market for significant political transformation. Overall, Bush gives sufficient information to back up his claims. Only reading the speech would not indicate this, but exploring his website provides background information and family history, and is all done with a friendly, inviting tone. The effort made by Bush to run and manage this campaign exemplifies a caring and committed candidate and produces an effective rhetorical argument.
“The beauty of me is that I am very rich” according to Donald Trump. His ignorance has lead him to do things that he shouldn’t being doing or has done. In the past few months he has been racist man that would insult people that are from a different race. When Trump started running for president he would insult and bully everybody in general not knowing the people’s stories. He made people seem like they are poor and have nothing to live for, Trump’s inability to see past his greed. He wants to separate the United States and wants people to think he is the best of the best; Trump should not be President.
President- elect, Donald Trump, and Vice President- elect, Mike Pence, have stated their views on Planned Parenthood and how it should be defunded; especially Vice President elect, Mike Pence, who has a history of trying to defund Planned Parenthood. In 2007, Mike Pence introduced a bill to defund Planned Parenthood, and kept pushing for it until it passed in 2011. "If Planned Parenthood wants to be involved in providing counseling services and HIV testing, they ought not be in the business of providing abortions," Pence told Sarah Kliff in 2011. "As long as they aspire to do that, I’ll be after them." So after this troubling statements and bills, I decided to set the record straight. Planned Parenthood is a nonprofit reproductive health care organization. It’s services provide STD testing, pregnancy prevention, contraception, counseling, cancer and HIV tests, and abortions. Planned Parenthood is a well rounded health care organization for men and women. They use their resources to help you not the other way around. Planned Parenthood is a program designed to help all human beings. Planned Parenthood shouldn’t be defunded; instead it should be keep being available to all human beings visiting or living in the
It is undoubted that we are exposed to more open and activating political environment today than ever. We talk about 2016 presidency election, criticize those candidates’ political claims, argue about political issues and disdain those who belong to different “side” with us. And it is under this social context that Planned Parenthood, all of a sudden, is dragged into the political spotlight.
“David Robinson, who performed a statistical analysis of the President-elect's Twitter account in August, said Mr. Trump's tendency to tweet like an "entertainer" meant he was able to garner the “interest" of the American people, which in turn boosted his chances of election success”(Independent.co.uk 1). His appeal to emotion has personally benefited himself to the point where he remained a key subject of interest throughout the entire election. Whether or not he was favored, he was the most focused on topic for the widespread media.
President Bush used a copious amount of rhetorical strategies in his speech. He used many forms of personification, anaphora and metaphors. Personification is used to get people to comprehend what the country has at stake here when he says, “Freedom and fear are at war.” Anaphora is used when he wanted to make a point by disclosing, “The advance of human freedom, the great achievement of our time, the great hope of every time…” He used metaphors to describe to this glorious nation what they could do by proclaiming, “...our generation, will lift a dark threat of violence of violence from our and our future.” Overall the President's tone was sombre and proactive because what he was talking about was the worst situation anyone could imagine in America. While being sombre he was also proactive because he knew we couldn’t just sit there and let it happen again and he was letting the people know he wasn’t going to.
Polls have a role in political campaigns and shaping government policies but recently the reliability of polls have come into question. The Republican polls provided the information to Presidential candidate Mitt Romney that he had a strong chance of winning key battle ground states. The polls showed "he had at least 267 out of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election" (Hoffman). When watching the election night returns the reality was Romney only received 206 Electoral College votes far away from the magic number needed to win or tie the national election. The candidate’s team used these polls and focused on states that showed a strong chance to gain votes. Romney focused his energy in Ohio and Pennsylvania, both states he eventually lost.