Dona Marina or La Malinche was the only prominent female figure in the conquest, being employed as an interpreter, guide, strategic advisor and friend and lover of Hernan Cortes. The mere fact that the conquistadors had reliable translator, was undoubtedly a huge success for them; however, there is evidence that La Malinche was not limited to only the role of an interpreter, but became influenced by many things. Bernal Diaz del Castillo, a soldier in the conquest was very often and reverently speaking of Dona Marina. He argued that without the help of Dona Marina, they would not have understood the language of New Spain and Mexico.
However Indian sources were even more interesting as commenting about her role, and on the fact of her fame
…show more content…
in the sources describing the conquest. By examining the two painting that we saw in the class Cortes rarely is painted directly without Dona Marinas presence beside him, and at times shows just La Malinche, without Herman, apparently, pointing her personal influence on some events. When she was brought to life at the court, her loyalty to Cortés could be dictated by the rules of conduct in the marriage of the local elite. In the role of the main wife she had to help her husband in achieving his military and diplomatic purposes. Mexican independence from Spain was the turning point in the perception of the image of La Malinche. But her status as a great conquistador was abandoned at the same time when Mexicans kicked the Spaniards. Since that time, her reputation has fallen to the reputation of a traitor. The reasons for the change of opinions were a lot. Nationalists started to enter into the Mexican government to invent new national ideas, starting with the rejection of everything Spanish, including common symbols, and society, at the same time praising the pre-Hispanic Indian culture. These measures, by which they reinterpreted the conquest, drowned the voice of La Malinche in history. The aim of the nationalists was to make women to subordinate to men, making them socially, physically and psychologically dependent and transforming them into the invisible, lifeless, useless, worthless objects. So, the nationalists created an example for Mexico with contrasting perspective on women, on example of La Malinche represented as pure evil. But her integrity and loyalty were the highest female virtue; La Malinche, thus, has been used as an example of a woman who retreated from the behavior expected from a female. She was surrounded by negative characters and images, and became associated with the negative aspects of national identity and sexuality. Her name became synonymous with the words "treason" and "betrayal". In prominent role in the creation of opinion against La Malinche was made by Octavio Paz.
He said that La Malinche was representative of a cruel incarnation of the feminine as a raped mother and a passive figure of the conquista. Yet she was described as the mother of the nation, that sold the Mexico to white people. It was a typical feature of La Malinche – she cheated on Mexico, and if she had been true and loyal to her people, then the conquest would never have happened.
Because of these images Mexican people began to despise La Malinche as a symbol of treason of Indian values and bondage of the Spanish culture. Since then, they do not forgive her. But it seems to me that people did not realize that she was a victim of patriarchal attitudes of the time - women were things for men. Her story really is replete with violence and ill-treatment of her, first by the Indians, and later – Spanish. That is why she used her ability as an interpreter to keep being significant and to remain brave for a woman in a man's world.
Nationalists described La Malinche as she sold and betrayed the entire Mexico. They accused her of rejection of ethnicity, especially during the events occurred in Tenochtitlan. However her quick actions saved the Spaniards, but contributed to the ruthless and cruel retribution of Cortez, during which hundreds of people were slaughtered. Nationalists saw this as a clear and distinct example of
betrayal. I was impressed by how La Malinche was living among all men and still stayed string and humble to her job. I disagree with the idea of her being a traitor. Firstly because it is important to remember that the idea of statehood did not exist. Even when the Aztecs dominated in most of the modern central Mexico, Mexico was not a state and, of course. There were several tribes despised the Aztecs that were tired of their system of taxes. But still they were considered neither as traitors nor as betrayers, despite the fact that they obviously played a much greater role in the defeat of the Aztecs than La Malinche. And I think the explanation is simple: for the nationalists La Malinche embodied the both political and sexual betrayal, while, for example, Tlaxcala - only political). The Spaniards took advantage of their hostile attitude and smoldering resentment on the Aztecs. Secondly, the population of Mexico did not perceive themselves as a unified entity. They did not perceive themselves as united Indians against the Europeans. Instead, they identified themselves as the Aztecs or tlashkalteki. So as La Malinche was not one of them, then she cannot be considered as their betrayer. She certainly could not consider herself as one of the Aztecs. Thus, the issue of ethnic and national loyalty is not justified. To accuse her of treason should consider Indians as a nation that is not established in this case. The Indians were scattered and presenting them as one nation and a unit we distort the facts.
In this section his initial thoughts show through. “But losers matter, especially in the history of early America.” Many different regions of early America are examined in their years of early conquest when native populations started their descent. The biggest theme throughout the section is the effect that conquistadors and explorers had on the native population in their search for gold and glory. The information that is given is not typical of what is learned of early America, but tries to really focus on the most important figures of the time and there voyages. For example, when talking about the Plains nations and there explorers, Coronado and De Soto a tattooed woman woman is brought up who had been captured by both explorers at different times and different places, but little is known about her. “Of the tattooed woman who witnessed the two greatest expeditions of conquest in North America, and became captive to both, nothing more is known.” This point captures the main idea of the theme and what many know of this time. Horwitz aims to point out the important facts, not just the well known
Even today, she’s still considered “La Reina de Tejano” and her legacy still lives on. Works Cited 1) http://www.biography.com/people/selena-189149 2) http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20105524,00.html 3) http://www.selenaforever.com/
One of the many characteristics that a hero needs to have is bravery. Cortez of course didn’t want what happen to happen, but he had the bravery to stand up to an Anglo sheriff to defend his brother. At the time that this happened, Anglos intimidated many Mexican-Americans who were living in Texas because of the tension that was there from the war. Mexican American were abused and mistreated because of the language barrier that wasthere was between them. This...
The fear the Spanish unleashed to the Natives was immense. The armor the Spaniard’s whore terrified everyone who saw them. The loud clamor they made as they marched also installed fear into the Natives heads.
La Malinche, also called Malintzin, Malinalli or Doña Marina, was a Nahua woman from the Mexican Gulf Coast. “She was born into a noble family sometime between 1496 and 1501 in the Paynalla province in Coatzacoalcos, in the Veracruz region of southern Mexico” (“Creator or traitor”). Pocahontas was born around 1595; she was the daughter of Wahunsenaca (Chief Powhatan). Her name was Matoaka, but she was called by her nickname Pocahontas, which means “Little Wanton” (“Pocahontas 1595 – 1617”). She lived in eastern North America, present day Virginia. These women belonged to different region of America and different time. Malinche had contact with Spanish conquerors and Pocahontas was related to English conquerors.
The downfall of the Aztec Empire was a major building block of the Spanish colonial empire in the Americas. Spain’s empire would stretch all the way into North America from the Southwest United States all the way up the Pacific Coast. The unfortunate side effect of this was the elimination of many nations of indigenous people. The three major themes shown in this conquest really give deeper look into the anatomy of this important historical event. Without context on the extent of native assistance given to Cortez in his fight with the Aztecs, a reader would be grossly uniformed. The Spanish conquest was closer to a civil war than an actual conquest. Until reading detailed personal accounts of the fighting it is difficult to judge the deadly effectiveness of the Spaniards technological superiority. Without it is difficult to imagine 500 conquistadors holding thousands of native warriors at bay. Once the greed of Cortez and greed in general of the Europeans one understands that if it wasn’t Cortez if would have just been a different man at a different time. Unfortunately fame and prosperity seem to always win over cares about fellow human beings
In The Underdogs written by Mariano Azuela, we are introduced to a character that strongly symbolizes the fuel of the Mexican Revolution. Heroes like Demetrio Macias brought the Serrano’s hope of giving them what they felt they truly deserved. Although Demetrio Macias, the general (colonel) of a rebel army is hunting down the army of Pancho Villa, he seems to have the same ideals as the enemy. In addition to Demetrio Macias, we meet women like Camilla and War Paint who represent the different roles that women played during the Mexican Revolution.
North Americans and Mexicans must also attempt to overcome the ideas that women should be seen and not heard. In Anzaldúa’s words, “Hocicona, repeloma, chismosa, having a big mouth, questioning, carrying tales are all signs of being mal criada. In my culture they are all words that are derogatory if applied to women – I’ve ever heard them applied to men” (2947).
In schools, students are being taught wrong information. “Our gods were vanquished after the fall of Tenochtitlan as were our traditions. Our warriors and nobles were eradicated, our children starved and our women ravished by the white conquerors and their allies.” (157). In books across America, the Spaniards were said to be good people, but the way that Huitzitzilin described what happened, shows the complete opposite of how the Spaniards actually were.
This historical study will define the important role of Hernan Cortes in the colonization of Mexico in the age of the Spanish conquistador. Cortes was an important figure in Mexican history because of his discovery of Mexico at the Yucatan peninsula in 1519. During this time, Cortes became a historical figure that represented the “conquistador” system of conquest throughout the Mayan and Aztec Empires during the early part of the 15th century. The fall of these indigenous civilizations marked the beginning of Spanish colonization of Central America. Cortes was a significant figure because of the primarily military style of coercion and conquest that sought to annihilate the indigenous peoples of Mexico, and to claim Spanish territory. These conquests contributed significantly to the blend of indigenous and Spanish traditions of Mexico’s national history. Cortes represents the first phase of colonization for the Spanish empire in terms of the violent and aggressive nature of the Spanish Conquistador in the discovery of Mexico. The image of the Spanish conquistador as an often violent and ruthless colonizer is defined the invasion and destruction of the Aztec empire in Mexican history. In essence, a
Aztec women embarked on several defining moments of labor, gender, class, symbolism, and political power in the Aztec Mexico history and culture. The roles of the Aztec women were unjustly marginalized. Their contributions to the work activities, economy, government and the influence of growth and development were grossly deceptive in the Ethnohistoric documents. Moreover, the variations of Aztec women cooking and weaving revolutionized gender. They say a picture is worth a thousand words.
The corrido has been identified as having distinctive characteristics that make up its theme and plot. First, the corrido has a “context of hostile relations between Anglos and Mexicans along the border and the establishment of a scenic structure, geographical locale, and opposing social forces” (Mendoza 146). The corrido’s hero “is a hard-working, peace-loving Mexican, who, when goaded by Anglos, outrages into violence, causing him to defend his rights and those of others of his community against the rinches, the Rangers” (Saldívar). This hero “is quickly introduced in legendary proportions and defiant stature” and many people must die before the hero reaches his triumphant, but tragic, demise (Mendoza 146).
Like many Chicanos, she developed a strong sense of cultural belonging. This is primarily due to discrimination amongst neighboring Mexicans, whites, and anyone in between. Latinos and latinas would attack her, saying “...cultural traitor, you’re speaking the oppressor’s language, you’re ruining the Spanish language” (Anzaldua 412). It was this ethnic struggle that drove her to latch onto her cultural background so strongly. In the personal narrative “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” by Gloria Anzaldua, Anzaldua states “When other races have given up their tongue, we’ve kept ours. We know what it is to live under the hammer blow of the dominant norteamericano culture” (Anzaldua 419) when referring to the resilience of her native people. She states this in response to other cultural groups having abandoned their language, meanwhile they retained theirs. The Chicanos are aware of the harsh standards of North American society. By saying “When other races have given up their tongue, we’ve kept ours,” she means that even when other ethnicities have been pushed to eliminate their languages, her ethnicity stayed strong; they refused to cave in. Likewise, when Anzaldua states “We know what it is to live under the hammer blow of the dominant norteamericano culture,” she draws pride from her culture’s ability to fend off even the most suffocating adversities. In this way, Anzaldua conveys
The image of the Virgin Mary seen by Juan Diego has changed the world. About forty years after Mary’s appearance to Diego, it is believed to be a turning point in western civilization. At this time there were a lot of copies of the painting of Our Lady of Guadalupe being circulated around Europe and one ended up in the hands of Admiral Giovanni Andrea Doria. The King of Spain gave this special copy to him. There were three hundred Turkish ships blocking the Gulf of Lepanto and the admiral was given command of a squadron to sail to the blockade. The Christian fleet consisting of about three hundred ships was to meet the Turkish navy head on. However, the Turkish outmaneuvered the Christian forces. It is said that when this crucial hour was at hand, Doria went into his cabin to kneel and pray before the Image of Guadalupe. By nightfall the direction of the battle started to shift. One Turkish squadron was defeated and captured causing the others to panic which lead to the destruction of the whole fleet. Fifteen thousand Christians that were enslaved in the Turkish galleys were freed. This battle marked the end of the Ottoman Empire’s expansion into the western Mediterranean.1
The contrast between the Mexican world versus the Anglo world has led Anzaldua to a new form of self and consciousness in which she calls the “New Mestiza” (one that recognizes and understands her duality of race). Anzaldua lives in a constant place of duality where she is on the opposite end of a border that is home to those that are considered “the queer, the troublesome, the mongrel and the mulato” (25). It is the inevitable and grueling clash of two very distinct cultures that produces the fear of the “unknown”; ultimately resulting in alienation and social hierarchy. Anzaldua, as an undocumented woman, is at the bottom of the hierarchy. Not only is she a woman that is openly queer, she is also carrying the burden of being “undocumented”. Women of the borderlands are forced to carry two degrading labels: their gender that makes them seem nothing more than a body and their “legal” status in this world. Many of these women only have two options due to their lack of English speaking abilities: either leave their homeland – or submit themselves to the constant objectification and oppression. According to Anzaldua, Mestizo culture was created by men because many of its traditions encourage women to become “subservient to males” (39). Although Coatlicue is a powerful Aztec figure, in a male-dominated society, she was still seen