Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Representation of women in literature
Representation of women in literature
Corruption and its effect in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Representation of women in literature
The daughter of a wealthy architect, Dominique Francon is a powerful woman who is convinced the world is full of rotten corruption and that all things good have no chance of survival. She believes she understands the world of the successful.She perceives that in order to gain power, one must change and conform themselves to society and in doing so will lose their pride and dignity in oneself. She hates how society destroys talent, goodness and excellence. Society slowly corrupts the work of excellence and changes good into evil. Dominique despises society because of the threat it holds against human perfection she so passionately believes in. She has a great admiration for all that is beautiful and strong, including the beauty in destruction. She firmly believes the world destroys all that is great and so she refuses to love anyone or anything in fear the world will ruin all that she loves. She surrounds herself by people she does not like, knowing she will be in no danger of getting hurt as she knows she will not be able to love them. Due to this, she refuses to compromise her values to what the world wants because she refuses for the world to taint her. She finds beauty in everything she sees, including destruction, and in order to avoid watching the world destroy all she loves, she surrounds herself with what she despises. Meeting Roark, she finds herself intrigued by the way he holds himself and how he never bends or folds to meet others expectations. Dominique finds herself drawn to him and, in an act of caring for a man with vision and character, she sets out to destroy him first as she fears the world will destroy his potential for greatness. Upon Dominique’s encounter with Roark, she instantly recognizes his potential... ... middle of paper ... ...ark cannot, then she has been in her belief that all is great will be harnesses and corrupted. For her, attacking Roark will answer her question of if it is safe to develop one’s power in a world filled with people who want to take advantage of it. If Roark is able to stay standing, despite having the worlds out to destroy him, then Dominique Francon believes she too will be able to survive through the cold and injustice society. She learns through Roark’s self-sufficiency to not let a flawed society hinder her life, nor harm her hope in her own ideals. She begins to stop caring what the world or anyone in it thinks. She lives for herself and no one else. She discovers that it is through loving and caring that one can find happiness, and that because it is her happiness, it can not be taken away from her. She learns to be the change she so wishes to see in society.
...e relationship with men, as nothing but tools she can sharpen and destroy, lives through lust and an uncanny ability to blend into any social class makes her unique. Her character is proven as an unreliable narrator as she exaggerates parts of the story and tries to explain that she is in fact not guilty of being a mistress, but a person caught in a crossfire between two others.
Dominique Francon is the heroine of The Fountainhead and proclaimed by Rand as "the woman for a man like Howard Roark." Dominique bridges each of the main characters in a clearly defined line and her encounters with each mark her growth towards being ideal woman for Roark. In the novel she heavily overlaps each individual character's story and walks away from them towards the next necessary lesson. While married to Peter Keating she enlightens him to what he will eventually discover o...
The central characters, setting, and tone of the story help create the central idea of the psychological and internal desires of a woman. Through the view of the central characters it is established that the lawyer’s wife wants more than her average day and is searching for more to life than the daily routine of a house wife. Jean Varin is believed to be the desire she is looking for; however, she is not fulfilled or happy with the outcome of her choices. The setting and the tone reveal the psychological need for the wife to have an adventurous, lavish, and opulent lifestyle that she feels can only be achieved in Paris.
Jean Renoir’s greatness is reflected in his concerns about the people living at the bottom of society. Nonetheless, instead of directly depicting them, sometimes he cleverly used the images of the upper-level class people to indirectly reflect them. For instance, as one of the greatest films in the history of cinema, La Règle du jeu in 1938 depicts the moral affectation and callousness of the upper-class French society at that age. In the story, even though Jurieux is invited to La Colinière, he does not belong to the upper-class. Ironically, Schumacher, the gamekeeper who shoots Jurieux to death, is also from the underclass society. Although the manslaughter happens between two men of the underclass society, it is the rules of the upper-class society the culprit of tragedy. On the surface, no one is accused to commit the murder. Nevertheless, what most horrible is this silent kill, and it is done by the upper-class people’s tacit
The nature of Dominique’s need to destroy pure beauty is derived from her hatred of society. People are not just undeserving of seeing demonstrations of the true greatness of man, but are going to ruin its purity with their gaze and under appreciation. Rand purports that altruistic societies such as that of the one Ellsworth Toohey created, taint the honing of talent.
...; Roark exists untainted by the disease that is conformity, and is all the better for it. The sad truth that parasites, such as Keating and Toohey, strive to control man, which leads both men to misery and eventual ruin. Keating living in his worse nightmare, alone, and exposed as a fraud. Toohey, on the other hand, continues to appear happy to the general public, but silently fights the knowledge that he will never be a creator. In the end the message is clear, to be a creator is to rise above society and evolve nature, without concern for the group pattern. The parasite, however, attempts to rule men, but ends up being prisoner to them. The path Roark followed required strength of character, drive, and endurance that few posses, but if one can survive going against the grain, they can discover true happiness.
The next point would what is morality, the qualities needed for freedom, which Meursault gained. First, the thought of the character’s passion for the truth. Meursault takes the role ...
In The Stranger, Camus portrays women as unnecessary beings created purely to serve materialistically and satisfy males through the lack of a deep, meaningful, relationship between Meursault and females. Throughout the text, the main character, Meursault, creates closer, more meaningful relationships with other minor characters in the story. However, in his interactions with females in this book, Meursault’s thoughts and actions center on himself and his physical desires, observations, and feelings, rather than devoting his attention to the actual female. Living in Algiers in the 1960s, Meursault originates from a post-modernist time of the decline in emotion. Meursault simply defies the social expectations and societal ‘rules’, as post-modernists viewed the world. Rather than living as one gear in the ‘machine’ of society, Meursault defies this unwritten law in the lackluster relationships between he and other females, as well as his seemingly blissful eye to society itself. In The Stranger, males, not females, truly bring out the side of Meursault that has the capacity for compassion and a general, mutual feeling relationship. For example, Marie and Meursault’s relationship only demonstrate Meursault’s lack of an emotional appetite for her. Also, with the death of Maman, Meursault remains virtually unchanged in his thoughts and desires.
In the end, Nora’s greatest strength became her greatest weakness and it lead to her vindicated defeat. If only Nora used her powerful gift of control to step up to society instead of blocking it out, would she been able to save herself, her family, and her characters reputation as a feminine heroine, instead of a controversial role. But perhaps the controversy over Nora’s character is what we cherish so deeply because it is beyond our understanding. The idea that she is someone who is eternally captivating but can never fully be defined completely.
La Belle Dame sans Merci, written by famous romantic poet John Keats in 1819, has been declared one of Keats’s greatest works due to the ambiguous boundaries it sets between imagination and reality [Kelly]. Throughout the poem, the reader always questions the “reality” presented by the poem, creating many facets that the readers have discussed for years and still have not established a definite answer as to their true meaning. La Belle Dame sans Merci embodies Keats’s “negative capability” perfectly. Keats believed that people of great intellectual prowess must retain the ability to accept that everything might not have a clear-cut value and that there is not always one true answer. This is the essence of negative capability, and the poem requires readers to utilize this mindset in order to possibly understand the mysticism the poem creates through the knight-in-arms’s tale.
The story starts off showing Mathilde Loisel’s feeling for her house which is old with worn walls, abraded chairs and ugly belongings. Culture appears in this story in the form of Mathilde Loisel’s desire to be a part of the upper class and the riches she wants to possess (Laurie) . Everyone from a lower class has a desire to move up to the upper class and live a life of comfort. The way Mathilde wants to portray herself during the invitation shows how one wants to portray themselves in front of others with beautiful dresses and fine jewelry. It also shows through Monsieur how the clerks were working hard to get noticed by their
Through her powerful words she is able to speak to both men and women on how feminism is not art all what society labels it to be. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie speaks the puissant words, “The problem with gender is that it prescribes how we should be rather than recognizing how we are. Imagine how happier we would be, how much freer to be our true individual selves, if we didn't have the weight if gender expectations (Adichie, 18:31).” These extremely powerful words are the basis for the beginning of the comprehension of why character’s resist the influence of conformity, yet the question as to how much one rejects societal norms and how this passion for nonconformity alters the minds of the authors and their characters conveyed. Unfortunately, this extreme drive we see can be altered into one’s own contorted ideals that in the end does not lead them in the right direction. Through the words of Dick Hickock, he evades conformity even to his very last breath. While on the gallows, he does the complete opposite of what you might expect a dead man to do. Instead, he shakes the hands of the men who captured him and says that he is going to a better world
This novel provides a detailed look into the early nineteenth century condition in France. It is considered an historical novel for this reason. The novel shows how new and radical thought processes, especially that in the justice and political realm such as the reactionary movement, came to be and were outgrown by the good of all people. Thos is a great historical novel based on any definition of historical fiction.
The Champs-Elysèes is in the upper class neighborhood, and her walk is too similar to her earlier day-dreams of upper-class wealth. But it’s on this street where she meets Mrs. Forrestier; this is the first time seeing her in ten years. Mrs. Forestier does not recognize her. She introduces herself and the other expresses surprise. She begins to explain why she has not been able to show up for such a length of time. She could not help but to be completely honest with Mrs. Forrestier about the necklace. In reply Mrs. Foresiter surprises her by telling Mathilde it was a false diamond necklace. The “smile” of “ innocent and proud happiness” filled Mathilde’s face (205). While the walk serves as the conclusion surprise and irony, Mathilde’s being on Champs-Elysèes is a complete character, in keeping with her earlier thoughts pleasantly lost in a daydream about
...ad this book might have a question that they cannot answer which is "Why did Dominique Francon try to destroy Howard Roark when she really loved him?". However, she was tired of the evil society and did not want to live a happy life in that society. That led her to concern about her lover, Howard Roark, that the talent that he had on designing and building architectures might get destroyed by the society who did not appreciate Howard Roark's work. There is an old quote saying "sometimes when you give something up, you find something better." We can see this quote relating to Dominique Francon's situation. Of course she did not want to destroy a guy who she really loved but by destroying him, she could satisfy herself that she was the one who destroyed Howard Roark, not the society. In other words, she wanted to destroy Roark before the society tries to destroy him.