Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of domestic violence on australia
Effects of domestic violence on australia
Cases of domestic violence reported
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of domestic violence on australia
New speech 66,152. That is the number of domestic violence incidence that were reported between September 2013 to September 2014 in Victoria. 72,376. That is the number of domestic violence incidence reported between September 2014 to September 2015 in Victoria. Yes, it is true that after 63 women were killed in Australia last year, the Australian Government finally decided to do something about this issue. They announced a 100 million dollar package, which aimed to provide a safety net for women and children at high risk of experiencing violence. But, is using most of these funds for the monitoring of perpetrators really going to resolve this issue? Is this sufficient to tackle the issue of domestic violence which has become a significant issue in our community with one in six Australian women having experienced violence from a current or former partner. I certainly do not think so. Domestic violence can happen in various forms such as through physical, emotional and economic violence, and can affect …show more content…
people of any age. It is a form of violence that can occur within any relationship, whether it be family or intimate relationship. do I need any of this or is it going to be a waste of words? While it is true that the recent 100 million dollar package announced by Malcolm Turnbull does seek to provide better protection for victims of domestic violence by providing advanced technology such as GPS trackers to monitor perpetrators, thereby enhancing the safety of victims, it does not protect potential victims. Rather, it serves to provide better protection for those who have already suffered from domestic violence. The government needs to start taking a more preemptive rather than a retrospective approach. I am certainly not implying that the government should implement policies which allow the police to spy on couples or imprison potential domestic violence offenders. Instead, I believe the government needs to distribute funds in a more strategic way. For instance, there needs to be more funding towards educating potential victims and offenders. The rationale for fostering respectful relationships among children and young people is clear. It has been proven that children and young people are easily influenced by what they see in their household. As such, respectful relationship education can prevent violence and reduce harm. Early interventions with children and young people can have a lasting effect on their relationships in the future. As such, by funding Respectful Relationships education projects nationally, we can assist children in developing the skills they require in order to ensure that they treat their partners well and with respect. Furthermore, such project aim to raise children’s awareness of ethical behavior and develop protective behaviors. If the government was to fund more domestic violence programs, this would give them the opportunity to provide more domestic violence awareness campaigns and school programs. This would allow teenagers to be educated about dating violence and the various ways of handling conflict. Statistic here. This is therefore likely to lower the rates of domestic violence in the coming years In addition, there is no doubt that domestic violence has a significant influence on children who may witness the violence. Children that are exposed to domestic violence may not only believe that such violence is acceptable and a ‘norm’ but may suffer from a range of conditions such as mood problems including depression, lower self-esteem and anxiety. The new funding did provide an additional 5 million dollars for local women’s case workers, in order to coordinate support for women, including housing, safety and budgeting services. However, is 5 million dollars really sufficient? In the past year, the Crime Statistics Agency found that 72,376 family incidents were recorded in Victoria from September 2014 to September 2015. This figure increased by 9.6 per cent compared to the same time period last year. Furthermore, between December 21 and January 3 2016, Rape and Domestic Violence Services Australia assisted 1043 individual clients. This figure increased by 32 per cent in comparison to the same period last year. With figures constantly rising, is this 5 million going to be adequate to provide victims with emergency protection and services after an assault? In order to tackle the rising figures of domestic violence it may also be beneficial to establish a specialized domestic violence court.
There are many benefits of having a specialized domestic violence court. Firstly, having a domestic violence court would ensure that such cases are heard more promptly as the court would only be hearing domestic violence cases, and thus, not other cases such as theft and burglary. Furthermore, having a specialized court for domestic violence would mean that the judges develop expertise in that area of law. This would be extremely beneficial as domestic violence cases can be very complex and is not as simple as putting the offender behind bars. Imprisoning domestic violence offenders who have children and a good job will not do them any good. In fact, doing so can tarnish their rehabilitation chances. Putting such individuals in prison may mean that they lose their job and can damage their relationship with their
children. Having a court that specializes with domestic violence cases may mean that the court is at a better position of handling such cases. As they solely deal with such cases, they are more likely to impose a sanction which is specific and beneficial for both the offender and the victim. For instance, the court may place more emphasis in assessing the situation, taking into account the physiological mind of the individual, the event leading up to the incident, the age and family status, such as if they have any children and their job security. Based upon such considerations, the court is able to impose a decision which is in the best interest of both the victim and offender. For example, the specialized court may place a greater emphasis in sending suitable offenders into programs which assist the offender in rehabilitating, rather than just determining whether the offender is guilty, and is so, proceeding to the sanctioning stage. Furthermore, the cost at national level caused by domestic violence is enormous. According to ‘Access Economics’ domestic violence costed Australia approximately Australia $8.1 billion in 2002 to 2003. In 2009, the ‘National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children’ estimated that violence against women and their children costed the Australian economy $13.6 billion. As the number of domestic violence cases increase every year, it is certain that the cost of domestic violence to the Australian economy will also continue to rise. It is estimated that without action to address violence against women and their children, approximately 750,000 Australian women will experience and report violence in the period of 2021 to 2022. This will cost the Australian economy an estimated $15.6 billion. We must act now before we are burdened by this cost! In order to reduce recidivism, more emphasis should be put on perpetrator programs rather than just a punishment such as a fine or community service, as they can potentially reduce the risk of known perpetrators committing further offences. Perpetrator programs aim to prevent violence by changing attitudes and behavior. A range of different approaches are employed in perpetrator programs including goal setting, solution focused approaches, counselling, behavior change, narrative therapy, and anger management. Such programs can assist offenders in rehabilitating. The NSW Domestic Abuse Program (DAP), which won a 2011 Australian Crime and Violence Prevention Award, has shown promising results in assisting offenders in their rehabilitation process. The 20 session rehabilitative group intervention program is utilized for offenders serving community-based orders or custodial sentences for domestic and family violence related offences which is run by the Department of Corrective Services. The program emphasizes the importance of interagency cooperation, victim safety and offender accountability. An evaluation of the program has shown significant reductions in reoffending rates in the Domestic Abuse Program treatment group and a longer time to reoffend, in comparison to a matched control group. need to include this somewhere!!!!
Domestic violence is a problem in our country with nearly 1 million women experiencing at least one incident of domestic abuse each year, (2009/10 British Crime Survey). Social-program funding is being scrutinized in the current economic climate with doubts as to whether American tax dollars should be used to help victims of domestic violence. Cutting funds for government programs that assist victims of domestic violence is not an option for many reasons. In this essay I will explore some of the many ways these programs help our fellow citizens in order to support the argument for continuing to fund said programs.
Domestic violence covers a large array of abuses. Some of the different types of abuse include Physical, Emotional, Verbal, Sexual and Economical. Women suffering abuse usually suffer from all the different types. Often one type of abuse will bleed or lead to another and most abuse cases never start out with something physical. Most of the time one form of abuse is being used to enforce another.
The Need for the Group. Domestic violence is a terrible curse to all those involved. It inflicts harm on the victim, the perpetrator and witnesses, whether they be children or not. While support services have long been available to assist women and/or children overcome any issues that arise as a result of domestic violence, these services have left out a significant portion of victims, those that are male. In 2012 the Australian Bureau of Statistics found “That 33.3 per cent of victims of current partner violence during the last 12 months were male” (ABS, 2012) and “37.1 per cent of victims of emotional abuse by a partner during the last 12 months were male” (ABS, 2012).
From Statistics Canada data, 6 percent of Canadians who have or had spouse or partner were victims of domestic violence in the previous 5 years (2010). At the same time, most cases of domestic violence are not reported to the police. Statistics Canada (2010) mentions that only about 22 percent of victims reported the assault to police. Obviously, many cases are not reported to the police for different reasons. Neil Boyd (2015) points out that it may be because victims did not think it was important or did not want to involve police. Some victims depend financially on their abusers, some are worried about the family and some do not believe that calling the cops will change anything (Boyd, 2015). According to Statistics Canada (2013), women are three time more likely to become the victims of spousal homicide than men. In the Gangaram and Allen case, the victim was several times physically assaulted by her ex-boyfriend before (Gillis,
Historically, domestic violence was viewed as only involving physical abuse. However, the more contemporary view of domestic violence has come to include not only physical types of abuse; but as well as emotional, sexual, physiological, and economic violence that may be committed
Attention Getter: According to The National Coalition of Domestic Violence, 1 in 3 women are victims of some form of physical violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime. A woman is assaulted or beaten every 9 seconds in the US.
Domestic violence within Australia is a fear induced mechanism that generates a loss of self sufficiency and personal freedoms for the victim, acting as an outlet to induce change and cement the perpetrators dominant position in the power hierarchy of the family structure (Berrington 2016). 2015 Australian of the Year, Rosie Batty labelled domestic violence as “family terrorism”, suggesting that associating the phrase 'domestic violence' alongside that of 'terrorism' would compel Government's to increase funding aimed at eliminating the issue, and adopt more effective legal and non-legal responses to the threat. Batty's assertion that domestic violence is a greater threat than terrorism is widely accepted due to vast statistical evidence; for
Domestic violence is an issue that has affected many people regardless of age, race, or gender. The seriousness of it can vary dramatically. Domestic violence is the intentional intent to physically and/or sexually assault, batter, or has abusive tendencies against a sibling, parent, child (ren), or domestic partner. The overwhelming emotional, psychological, and physical ramifications of domestic violence can cross generations and last a lifetime. Bringing an end to abuse is not a matter of the victim choosing to leave; but the victim being able to evade their abuser safely. Establishing, I Choose Life Organization, gives those victims a safe haven to get back that confidence and self-respect that they lost due to their abuser.
"Each year an estimated 2 million to 4 million woman in the Untied States are abused by their male partners. Many of them are severely physically assaulted, and thousands are killed" (www.mayoclinic.com). Statistics such as these are phenomenal. Domestic abuse appears not only with violence, but it is very prevalent in psychological abuse. Domestic violence is widespread through the United States, mostly due to fear caused by the abuser. The problem is recognized in the United States and much is being done to correct this problem. The statistics of woman and domestic violence are very high .
Domestic Violence refers to the use of aggression towards one's significant other (be it in a marriage, in a committed relationship or a casual cohabitation). While the victims are mostly women, it is not unheard of men to be on the receiving end of domestic violence. In the United States, 22.1% of women and 7.4% of men having been victimized at least once in their lifetime by their spouse (current / former) or boyfriend/girlfriend. Statistically, 1 in every 4 women in the United States has been victimized at some point in her life.
... policies have to be able to effectively deal with the crime. The results of this study can be used to formulate policy in the state and in other states. The study plays an important role in understanding the nature of domestic violence, and how enforcement of stricter laws against it will affect its prevalence in the community.
There are many forms of domestic violence but the more prevalent types that I will discuss are physical abuse, verbal abused, psychological abuse, sexual abuse, social abuse and economical abuse. Every nine seconds, a husband physically abuses his wife in the U.S. (Schwartz & Scott, 2003). Physical abuse is any action that is taken against another person that inflicts pain and harm in order to control or intimidate whether in public or private. Pushing, slapping, punching, biting, kicking are just so...
Domestic violence can affect families in more ways than one: the husband-wife relationship, the children, and also the financial stability. “One woman is beaten by her husband or partner every 15 seconds in the United States” (Stewart & Croudep, 1998-2012). Domestic violence can interfere with the husband-wife relationship because one spouse is always in constant fear of the other. This violence could vary from physical abuse to psychological abuse, meaning that the abuser persuades the victim that they deserve the beating.... ...
Domestic violence is skyrocketing in our society. In the U.S., as many as 1.5 million women and 850,000 men were physically assaulted by their intimate partner last year, and numerous children abused by their parents. These sad criminal acts will continue to grow in our society, unless our community takes action to stop these crimes.
In my library research I came across an article by Boshier Peter titled “Family Law: Family Violence.” He is Principal, Family Court Judge, New Zealand. He said that the family violence is one of the most serious problems facing New Zealand. This article includes statistics about violence. During 2008, about 38,369 violence case related to incidents were recorded in the police department, and about 32,675 family violence related offences. That is lead to a huge family violence number which is 71,044 (Boshier). Also, the article appeals that every violence.