Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender equity in African society
Gender equality in ancient civilizations
Gender equality in ancient civilizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender equity in African society
The topic of gender roles and gender inequality has been a universal issue. There has always been a norm that men were seen as the dominant figures while women were inferior. But recently, people have been more aware and have begun taking action to promote gender equality. The art piece that I will be discussing is the wood-sculpture named the Dogon Couple. It was made sometime between the 16th and 19th century in Mali, Southern cliff. This sculpture is made out of wood and metal. The sculpture’s credit line is Lester Wunderman because it was gifted from Wunderman in 1977. This sculpture is now exhibited in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The sculpture presents to the audience the idea of equality between men and women in the Dogon society …show more content…
By using bilateral symmetry, the audience can see that they look almost identical except for the distinct features that identify them as man or woman. “The artist distills man and woman to a perfectly integrated and harmonious union”. The artist portrays man and woman as if they are one being. The way the man and woman in the sculpture are display and from the size of both sculptures, it can portray the idea of how they are representations of each other. The physical features of both their faces, from their eyes, nose, and even their bodies and legs are identical. Both of their bodies are long and vertically parallel to each other to show that they are the same. But the man has a beard while the woman has more jewelry like the earrings portrayed on her face. This is to symbolize a more feminine figure. But even though the man has a beard, she has a labret that is inserted on her lower lip as an ornament which balances out the shape of the man’s beard which ultimately shows that they are still identical and equal despite their gender. Their facial expressions are the same. They look identical to the point where the artist is trying to say that the man and woman are reflections of each
Both statues are double portrait with two figures standing side by side. They are joined together to create one single unit with a frontal pose. Both statues are reliefs that are united to their wife as a symbolic gesture of embrace. Yuny and Renenutet medium is limestone and paint, meanwhile Menkaure and his wife medium is greywacke. Menkaure and his wife is wearing a royal traditional custom emphasizing power through headdress, beard, and royal knit. However, Yuny and Renenutet is wearing a less traditional custom, but more fashionable emphasizing the importance and power through head gear and clothing only. Individually Yuny and Renenutet and Menkaure and his wife has many similarities and
To conclude, both sculptures do not have much in common, but it is obvious that the artists had knowledge in human anatomy and was able to sculpt them spectacularly. It is also obvious the break from somewhat idealistic to realistic human nature. The change is so drastic that one might not believe that both sculptures come from the same Greece because it is so well-known for its astonishing artworks found in temples, building, etc.
Both sculptures represent Mary holding the dead body of Jesus. According to our textbook, “This figure group represented a challenge for sculptors, because the body of the adult Christ had to be positioned across his mother’s lap,” (139). Both of the sculptures were created through carving. This is a “subtractive process in which a block of material is cut away to reveal the desired form,” (Carving).
Both pieces to me seem to represent godlike features. For example, in the palette the king is shown as larger than his enemies and in the stele the king is standing over the people and is much higher than them. As rulers, they are both depicted as strong and heroic and as humans, they are depicted as
The subject does not accurately depict the human anatomy. In fact, while studying this figure, one may notice that geometric shapes make up many of the limbs. For example, the artist uses ovals to represent the palm of the hands, the shoulders and the knees. The man's chest is in the form of squares with rounded edges and with perfect little white circles as nipples. This...
On the other hand, his well-defined upper body with broad shoulders, muscular chest, and burly biceps are exemplified with smooth and elegant carved lines symbolizing his youthfulness. However, these smooth and elegant lines do not weaken at all his powerfulness which is best illustrated with his straight hanging down arms while his fists are wrapped around some kind of circular solid rod. The viewer captures his youthfulness but still gets the notion of his strength through the indicated tension in his smooth naturalistic carved muscles in his underarms. It is the contrast of these two different usages of lines that gives the sculpture the balance between the strength of confidence and relaxed peace.
In my examination of the works, I came across a particular sculpture that portrayed both beauty and craftsmanship. A 15th century sculpture (1490), made in Venice, Italy by Tullio Lombardo, shows a life-size figure of Adam. Titled Adam, the work is the most prominent in the gallery mostly because of its 6-foot standing. It immediately caught my attention and gave me a very realistic impression. One beige color and made of marble, Adam is depicted simply, yet the statue has intense emotions. His meaningful glance is seen in the upward and tilted head position. Adam has almost lifeless looking eyes and seems to be staring into the distance. With these sagging eyes, parted lips, and lacking posture I feel Adam’s guilt is displayed in this figure.
These two artworks are similar and also have differences they range from the colours, shape, and
Both of these pieces of art have much in common. Their functions are almost identical. Both were used to mark burial sites and to honor the deceased buried there. The body language of both the pieces’ figures are similar, with one seated and several others standing around them. Neither has color, but unlike the grave stele, the funerary banquet does show some degree of emotion. The figures in the banquet scene have slight smiles. These pieces played an important role in their times, honoring those who had passed on to the afterlife. For both of these people, it was important to memorialize them very similar to our practices today.
Linda Nochlin in her article, “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” discusses the various aspects to this issue and believes that even though the legal battles of the feminist movement provided formal legal equality to women, too often, it does not ensure substantive equalities. The explanations to this problem can cover the spectrum from sexism to feminism. Nochlin rightly believes that perhaps, the true answer lies in the institutional problems that plague our society. As Nochlin points out, “as late as 1893, lady students were not admitted to life drawing at the Royal Academy in London, and even when they were, after that date, the model had to be partially draped.” The very fact that women artists were denied the right to paint
Although both sculptures, LOVE and The Kiss, are about love, they touch upon different aspects of love. The LOVE structure illustrates love in general, as a whole. The word love can be interpreted into the love a parent has for their child or even the love of an object. On the other hand, The Kiss can be interpreted as ecstasy or even lust. Although The Kiss seems to be viewed as the more romantic of the two, LOVE demonstrates love better because the...
The Lady has a white “V” neck shaped collar while the Mona Lisa has gold trim on her square shaped collar. Mona Lisa’s dress also looks a lot more flowy and lighter while the Lady’s dress seems more layered and thicker probably due to the colder weather in northern Europe. The Lady only has a dark blue canvas for a background while the Mona Lisa has a clearly defined landscape behind her with trees, water and a dirt road. The veil that the Lady wears is made from significantly thicker cloth and wears a dark colored headband. The Mona Lisa’s veil is barely visible. The Lady has a lighter hair color and is tied up in a bun with some kind of net or cap around it with silver pins tucked into it to keep her veil in place, while Mona Lisa has her dark, wavy hair draping down her shoulders in a casual yet elegant manner. We can see the ears on the Lady, but the Mona Lisa has her ears covered by her hair. The eyes of the Lady are bright and hazel colored. Mona Lisa’s eyes are dark and you can barely see her pupils in her irises. Maybe that is how Leonardo got the effect that her eyes seem to be moving. It also appears that she has no eyebrows, or they’re severely
Art depicting women reflected this expectation of virtuousness – while art pieces featuring males, whose image as athletic, youthful embodiments of
Starting from hundreds and thousands ago gender inequality exists. Some would point out that there is not any gender inequality around us, but there are. For this paper, I am going to write about gender inequality. First, I would attach an argument from articles. However, I would object the articles and provide an explanation for my objection. Then, I would consider a response of my objection and reject the objection.
In today’s society, a majority of young couples are taking the opposite route when it comes to preparing for marriage. Instead of waiting till their newlyweds to move in together, many couples have decided to move in together. They believe that by living together, the divorce rate is decreased significantly. This idea of living together before marriage baffles a lot of people who are pro and against the idea. Yet, when you think about it for a moment, it does kind of make sense. Compared to previous generations, millennials would rather live together to decide whether marriage is in their future. There have been arguments for and against this idea of couples moving in together.