Does The Trinity Open For Human Relations?

454 Words1 Page

Question:
Why is it that so many Christians do not understand how the Trinity is open for human relations? Is it due to the fact that the church lacks the correct ways to properly teach and to understand the Trinity? Or is it reasons still unknown to the general and elite populations?
So if we, as the church, are “the signs and servants of the kingdom to come,” how do we begin to fulfill this calling, or what do do we need to relearn to properly accomplish all that God has called the church to do?
How do we, as the church, learn to teach the Trinity in its full meaning? More so, how do we teach the Trinity as that God is all of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and not just Father, or Son, or Holy Spirit? In doing so will this be the step required …show more content…

Empirical (85): provable or verifiable by experience or experiment.
The author uses empirical to say that priori philosophy does not follow the way of early church fathers who sought after historical proof to understand the Trinity, but does so in a different way. 3. Resurgence (86): rising or tending to rise again; reviving; renascent.
The word resurgence is used in the text to let the reader know that the topic of the Trinity has risen so many times and that even Karl Barth, felt the need to raise it up again to bring to the Trinity, its original meaning, but done so in a different way. 4. Eschatological (87): the branch of theology dealing with last, or final, matters, as death, the Judgement, the future state, etc.
The author uses the term eschatological in to talk about our wait for “End Times.” The text comes from a quote by Hoffmeyer and his talk about the two factors involved with the gathering and sending of the church. 5. Coercion (92): the use of force or intimidation to obtain

Open Document