Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Does gun control reduce crime
Gun control and crime arte increases
Gun control policy in the united states aricles papers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Does gun control reduce crime
Does Gun Control Work?
In America, there's a lot of debate about whether or not gun control would work in the United States. Most Republicans and conservatives want less gun control, but most Democrats and liberals want more gun control. People should know some gun control history, the amount of deaths and lives saved by firearms and also what guns are commonly owned, and know the difference between full auto and semi auto and what is a bump stock and how it works and if more gun control will work or not.
The first gun control legislation was passed on June 26, 1934. The National Firearms Act part of President Franklin D Roosevelt’s New Deal for Crime. In 1938, the FFA required gun manufacturers, importers, and dealers to have a federal
…show more content…
firearms license. In 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson pushed for the Gun Control Act of 1968. The GCA repealed and replaced the FFA. The bill imposed age restrictions for the purchase of handguns so they had to be at least 21 years old, prohibited felons, the mentally ill, and others from buying guns. The bill also required that all manufactured or imported guns have a serial number. In 1986 the Firearm Owners Protection Act was passed by congress. The bill also includes expanding the GCA to prohibit civilian ownership or transfer of full auto guns “machine guns” not semi auto guns made after May 19, 1986. In 1994 the Violent Crime Control and Law signed by former president Clinton. It banned the sale of semi auto rifles from 1994 to 2004. “A Timeline of Gun Control Laws.” On average there's about 36,000 people that die from firearms. Out of that 36,000 about 22,000 die from suicide, 12,000 get murdered, 500 get killed unintentionally, 500 get killed by legal intervention and 300 die but the intent was unknown. Not many media sources break down the numbers of gun deaths. Most of guns deaths are suicides and most of the gun suicides are done by males. According to “FBI statistics” for murders by firearms, though 2010-2014, handguns kill about 9,000 people, rifles kill about 350 people and shotguns kill about 300 people. A CDC report says that 500,000 to 3 million lives are saved by guns in a self defense situation. Some cases of just showing your firearm can deter criminals from harming you and or your family. In America about 42 percent of U.S.
households had at least one gun in possession. The most common owned type of gun by type. The five most commonly owned pistols are Glock 19, Sig Sauer P938, Springfield XD-S, Ruger Lightweight, Smith & Wesson M&P Shield. The five most commonly owned rifles DPMS Oracle, Ruger AR-556, Kel-Tec SuB-2000, Colt LE6920, Smith & Wesson M&P15. That's just a few of the pistols and rifles. Americans own between 210 to 370 million guns there's about 55 guns per 100 people.
The AR-15 platform is the most commonly sold rifle in the US. The AR in AR-15 actually stands for ArmaLite Rifle not assault rifle. The AR is a semi auto rifle, which means one pull of the trigger only shoots one bullet you cannot purchase a full auto AR-15 they have be banned since 1986. The type of round the AR shoots is the 223. AR-15's and other semi-automatic "assault weapons" were only used in 24.6 percent of mass shootings, according to a Northeastern University
…show more content…
study. “What Is a Bump Stock and How Does It Work”? Bump stocks are an accessory to a rifle. A bump stock doesn't make a gun full auto but it simulates full auto fire, but the rifle is still a semi auto rifle which makes it legal to own and have a bump stock. The way a bump stock works is the shooter holds their trigger finger in place, while applying forward pressure on the barrel and backward pressure on the pistol grip while firing which allows the gun to use the recoil to bump fire. The NRA supports the idea of tighter regulation on bump stocks. If you want to buy a rifle you have to know what you want to buy and you should research your state laws. Then the seller has to perform a background check and make sure you're over 18. Then the FBI will check your background and make sure you're able to purchase the rifle you want. The ways you cannot buy a gun is if you're convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment of more than a year, a fugitive from justice, an illegal alien, someone under a restraining order for harassing or threatening an intimate partner or the child of an intimate partner, and a person convicted of domestic violence. More gun control might work, or it may not. In my opinion, I beviele that to much gun control will limit law abiding Americans to purchase guns and protect themselves and their family or be able to hunt. The places with the most gun control usually have the most gun violence for example, Chicago is one of the cities with the most gun control and has one of the highest homicide rate in the country. Yes it's a good thing that we have background checks and regulations to keep criminals from buying guns that they don't need. But one thing more gun control won't stop is shootings and if you do a gun buyback, It might seem good, but in the end the good citizens would turn their guns in but not the bad. “Repeal gun-free zones”, killers continue targeting locations where guns are not allowed.
Ninety-eight percent of public mass shootings in this country occur in gun-free zones. 81% of police officers support arming teachers and principals so that teachers can protect the students. So what would work? Repealing gun-free zones. The killer at Sutherland Springs church in Texas last November was stopped by a neighbor with an AR-15. The year before, police credited an armed firefighter with stopping a school shooting in South Carolina. He was possessing a concealed handgun.For example, France has far more gun control than we do. The French have greater restrictions on semi-auto weapons. Yet gun ownership restrictions in France did not stop terrorists from murdering 130 people at a concert in 2015. Not only that, France had more mass shooting deaths and injuries in 2015 than during Barack Obama’s eight years as president. Repealing gun-free zones and lifting the restrictions that keep good people from carrying guns for
self-defense. President Trump’s stance on gun control is more conservative and pro gun. Trump repeatedly promised to eliminate gun-free zones around schools and military bases. At a rally in New Hampshire on January 7, 2016, he vowed to abolish them on his first day in office, saying, “You know what a gun-free zone is to a sicko? That’s bait.” Trump wants to arm teachers to protect the student. “History shows that a school shooting lasts, on average, 3 minutes. It takes police & first responders approximately 5 to 8 minutes to get to site of crime. Highly trained, gun adept, teachers/coaches would solve the problem instantly, before police arrive. GREAT DETERRENT!” (Donald Trump)
One of the biggest debates in education is how to respond to gun violence in schools. According to BBC, “There were 64 school shootings in 2015” (BBC). One response to the rise in gun violence in schools is to arm teachers. Even our President has mentioned “giving a bonus” (Davis 2) to teachers that The fact that the idea of arming teachers is even being discussed is disappointing. Bringing more guns into a school is not the answer to gun violence. Most people that defend the idea that guns will “help” keep schools safe have basically three points: (1) teachers will be trained in gun safety, (2) it helps deter potential school shooters, and (3) it will make the students feel more safe. Even though there is some truth to those points, I think that the cons of arming teachers vastly outweigh the pros of arming teachers.
Gun control is a very controversial subject now days in politics. My personal view on gun control is that it will never work. I'm am just fore warning you that this paper may be a little bias, but I'll try to give views from both sides.
Enforcing an assault weapons ban can reduce the all-too-familiar occurrences of mass shooting and massacres. When Adam Lanza shot 26 people in Sandy Hook Elementary School..police say he largely relied upon a Bushmaster AR-15 "assault-type weapon," a semiautomatic rifle that could rapidly fire multiple high-velocity rounds. He was also equipped with magazines that held 30 bullets each (Plumer). As a chart from Princeton's Sam Wang shows, the number of people killed in mass shootings did go down in the years the [1994 Assault Weapons Ban] was in effect...and the number of mass shootings per year has doubled since the ban expired (Plumer). This statistic clearly shows the effectiveness of the ban passed by Congress and signed by former president Bill Clinton as part of the V...
Some people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban of private firearm possession, and violating individual ownership rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting firearm access.
They have taken over the interest of everyone who thinks they are in danger. Even with the protection of a handgun, statistics show that crimes are still being committed. According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics “an average of only about 65,000 defensive uses of guns each year compared to the more than 800,000 crimes committed with guns” (Mcdowell 1982-84). Guns are a danger in the household if marital disputes and domestic violence are present. If a gun is a readily available object, then the chances of it being used to let out anger and frustration instead of self-protection is great.
“I don’t believe people should be able to own guns. (Obama)” This said prior to Obama’s presidency, in the 1990’s, is still a topic that is constantly questioned today. Many American’s feel the need to seek ownership of weapons as a source of protection; While others believe that private ownership of guns will do nothing more but heighten the rate of violence due to people taking matters into his or her own hands. Philosophy professor Jeff McMahan agrees with Obama’s statement in regard to the ownership of guns. In his New York Times editorial titled “When Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan provides evidence to support his theory of the dangers that quickly follow when allowing the community to own guns legally. McMahan, throughout the text, shows responsible reasoning and allows the reader the opportunity to obtain full understanding and justifies his beliefs properly.
... a high school student, I don’t take much stock in the safety codes and drills in place to keep students safe in the event of a shooting. I would feel much safer knowing my teacher has the ability to protect the class, rather than hide and lock the door. An educator is responsible for the students in their class. They are responsible for their education and their safety while the children are in their classroom. The safety of fifteen or more students would be much more easily secured by one person if that person was armed. Promoting teachers to arm themselves also prevents school shootings; criminals don’t attack a victim that can fight back. At least 60% of school attacks would be prevented with an armed faculty warning sign. School faculty members should be armed to secure the safety of the countries students, and in hand prevent the majority of potential shootings.
Gun violence in the United States is higher than ever, and criminals with guns will “…kill as many as 1000 people each day” (Alpers&Wilson). Taking this into perspective, it is only right to fight fire with fire or, in this case, use a gun to protect yourself and those around you. Gun control does not only decrease the ability for protection, it also decreases our rights as U.S citizens. The constitution clearly states that we are given the right to bear arms, meaning we may carry fire arms. Even if we have stricter laws for guns, it will not stop killers from shooting innocent people. These men and women causing damage to the lives of numerous individuals do not care if there is a law banning guns, because all they truly want to do is hurt others. The pain citizens endure every day from losing a family member, friend, or even just a colleague is repulsive. These permanent deaths continue to make people fearful and it causes damage in their lives; unless something is done. Most people agree that action needs to be taken to stop this inhumane cruelty, but the question is; what can be done? Americans need protection, rights, and power to break this inexcusable gun violence circling America. Gun restrictions for trustworthy and reliable gun owners have not been proven to weaken gun violence in the United States; therefore, gun control should be limited because it is only hurting America, not helping it.
At present there are numerous regulations and restrictions on firearms imposed by the government. However there are no national mandated requirements or all encompassing legislation. The laws in place vary from state to state and are in some cases are poorly enforced. Hard evidence as to the effectiveness of these present regulations is ambiguous. The question as to how the government and society deals with gun control is unique to the USA. In a complex issue such as gun control both sides of the equation have valid arguments to be h...
The statistics show that the 31 states that allow private citizens to carry concealed weapons have an average 24% lower violent crime rate. They also have 19% lower murder rate. There are 39% lower robbery rate than states that don’t allow concealed carry. The nine states with the lowest violent crime rate all have the right to carry. The bad guys know there is more of a risk to use their gun. If the violent intruder came in with a gun and the teachers had guns, he would be instantly out numbered. This would only make our schools less
Arming teachers is believed to make schools safer. Each year 142 school shootings take place, but only in the U.S.. On 5/3/17, 45 school shootings took place in the U.S. in the year 2017. That’s about one third, only in four months, which gives more time for shootings to happen. In these shootings, many people die, and many others wish they were stopped.
Since the development of firearms, human life has been threatened more than during the use of any weaponry. Crimes related to firearms like mass killing, assault and homicide are increasing at a tremendous rate. Keeping the safety of their citizens in mind, many nations have formulated gun control laws as a major part of their legislation. Just like other nations, United States have also passed out Second Amendment law declaring ‘right of the people to keep and bear Arms’ (Worsnop). Gun control laws illustrated by the second amendment make drastic changes in gun-related issues. Not only did it restrict the usage of highly dangerous assault rifles
“More than 400 people have been shot in over 200 school shootings.” (Patel). A lot of the deaths and injuries could have been avoided with the use of hand held guns. Also arming teachers with guns can be used as a threat to shooters. Money also would not be that big of a problem. The outcome would be very successful and according to CNN, “Arming teachers ‘can be done right’” (Chavez).
Revolvers – these can be described as pistols with revolving chamber which enables you to fire several shots without reloading. Revolvers were popular in the end of XIX - beginning of XX century because they are quite easy to use, reliable, and cheap, but were soon replaced by pistols because of their limited capacity and mobility. However, revolvers are still used by the policemen -- large-caliber bullets they use (“Magnum” 45 or 36 millimeter) can knock out an outlaw at first shot, even if fired in foot. Revolvers usually hold 5, 6, or 7 bullets. There are 2 major types of revolvers: with single and simultaneous extraction of fired shells. In the first case, after you’re done shooting, you have to take out every single shell using some sharp object to push on it from the front holes of the chamber. In the second case, the revolver usually opens up, “breaking into two pieces” and you pull out every single shell, or the chamber is shifted left and emptied by pushing on the special rod in the front (i.e. “Colt” or “Smith-Wesson”). Revolvers are also divided into manual and automatic ones. In the manual revolver you have to draw back the firing lever each time to make a shot, in automatic it moves back itself, each time you pull on the trigger.
Mass gun ownership is today the greatest threat to American citizens. It has been and still is both a right in America and one of the highly controversial political and social issues. Currently, there are over 250 million guns owned by Americans. Statistically, this means that almost every American owns a gun with a third of the population owning these fire arms. Consequently, America has the highest number of gun related deaths in the world. While a gun is acquired with personal protection in mind because it is the most effective defense weapon, it does not mean it is the only choice.