Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on victim blame
An essay on victim blame
Victim blaming and blame culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on victim blame
Has Christianity Encouraged Victim-Blaming? Victim blaming is “a social and psychological phenomenon wherein the fault in a crime (rape, robbery, assault) is attributed to the victim. The victim is regarded as partly or completely responsible (to blame) for the accident or trauma. These are but forms of rationalization and coping mechanisms in an attempt to distance one's self from the victim and the problem” (Psychology Dictionary). There is a reason a psychological dictionary offers a definition of victim-blaming at all - it is because there exists a psychological reason why human beings engage in victim blaming. Juliana Breines explains in an article titled “Why Do We Blame Victims?” that “victim blaming tendencies are rooted in the belief …show more content…
Rosemary Radford Ruether, in the first chapter of Sexism and God-Talk, argues that if the goal of Christianity is the redemption of humanity, and women make up half of humanity, then whatever may detract from the full humanity and liberation of women is not redemptive. In this way, she implies that sexism is not Christian, and seems to suggest that it is a sin. The sexism inherent in sexual assault victim-blaming thus undermines the logic of victim-blaming. Similar logic can be applied to poverty victim-blaming, as poor people also make up a large part of humanity - if the goal of Christianity is the redemption of humanity, and the poor make up a large part of humanity, then whatever may detract from the full humanity and liberation of the poor is not redemptive, and thus …show more content…
The entire idea of sexuality or anything that prompts thoughts of sexuality being immoral causes attractive features to be perceived as sexually immoral themselves so that they must be hidden. Yet, these expectations only seem to apply to women. Women are expected to dress modestly and behave in a demure and innocent fashion in order to indicate their sexual purity. As explained by political writer Amanda Marcotte in her article “How Christian conservatives blame victims and let rapists walk free,” this puts an undue emphasis on women as the “controllers of sex and the people who have the responsibility of enforcing chastity.” If women are seen as being in control of sex, then they can be blamed when they are sexually assaulted because they supposedly tempted the assailant. In addition, the widely disseminated ideas of St. Augustine further contribute to this idea of women being in control of sex because he describes sexual desire for men as inescapable and enslaving, such that they cannot control their urges in Books II and III of his Confessions. Thus, when enticed supposedly by the way a woman is dressed or behaves, a man can say that he cannot help
…many people now acquire "victimhood" through counseling. Being a "victim" draws sympathy. It explains the tragedies, the failures, the hardships, the health problems and the disappointments of life. It relieves people of some of life's natural burdens: dealing with complexity, facing things beyond their control, and accepting responsibility for decisions and actions.
The civilization of men is called chivalry and is earned by women at the price of their own civilization. “For the female, civilized behavior means chastity before marriage and faithfulness within it. Chivalrous behavior in the male is supposed to protect that chastity from involuntary defilement” (Griffin, 516). Unfortunately, the definition of civilization for women requires them to be feminine, dainty, and submissive while men are strong and dominant. This robs women of the mentality that they can be strong and independent and forces them to seek protection from men instead of finding it in themselves. This mentality and dependence deprives women of the ability to protect themselves from men creating a world of fear for them to live in. It also keeps women submissive because they do not want to step out of line and risk being hurt. Essentially, men keep women submissive by defining womanhood and using it like a cage to restrict their behavior and thoughts. In addition, their chivalrous protection does not apply to women who step outside of their required behavior. This means that women who act independently cannot be raped, they are beyond violation and an open target for all men. This double standard serves to make rape an acceptable and even encouraged behavior while keeping women quiet and well-behaved, lest they be mistaken for a bad girl worthy of
There are always those moments when we make decisions that affect the rest of our lives, turning left when we should have turned right. The difference is that most times we live to regret those decisions unlike Carla and her ill-fated jog to her death. There have been throughout time theories as to why offenders commit crime and what drives them to go against all social norms, but now the discussion in the last 50 years, or so, has been what and how much responsibility the victim has in what makes them an attractive target and how their daily routines can even make then more susceptible to crime. The three theories of victimization I found are the Victim Precipitation theory, the Deviant Place theory, and the Lifestyle theory. Each theory has
Burt explains that “the hypothesized net effect of rape myths is to deny or reduce perceived injury or to blame the victims for their own victimization” (Burt, 217). When men get raped they don't see it as getting raped. Yet, when it comes to women they are more easily blamed because of “poor choices” like walking down an alleyway late at night, wearing sexy clothes or for drinking too much, giving a man a “justifiable” reason for his actions. McMahon also describes how “common rape myths include the belief that the way a woman dresses or acts indicates that “she wanted it” and that rape occurs because men cannot control their sexual impulses” (McMahon, 357). Chapleau, Oswald and Russel also explicate how “benevolent sexism is associated with victim blaming to protect one’s belief in a just world” (602). Benevolent sexism is the reverent attitudes that reward women who are traditionally feminine and is similar to hostile sexism in the idea that hostile sexism is when women are objectified or degraded often presented as anger, resentment or fear, while benevolent sexism is just as harmful, but put into a positive disguise, in a casual nonchalant manner that doesn’t make it so
Ideologies are to blame Secondly, dominant ideologies in the media represent criminals as demoralized and dangerous individuals while, on the other hand, police officers are depicted as “honest and heroic public servants” (Hirschfield and Simon 2010: 155). In turn, these forms of ideology lead to individuals blaming the victims for their abuse. In addition, according to William Ryan (1976: 3) the formula for blaming the victim is, “justifying inequality by finding defects in the victims of inequality”. In other words, blaming the victim occurs when the victim of a crime is held accountable for the violence that they endured. Thus, the victim of the crime is blamed for his or her suffering.
I have been taught that Christianity is a loving religion that cares for all, But this is not always the case. Upon reading, among other theological works, “Quest for the Living God” by Elizabeth A. Johnson, it becomes apparent that Christianity has been used to systematically marginalize women throughout history despite the teachings of the Bible. While it might not be intentional, the negative treatment of Women has been ingrained into Christian teachings over hundreds of years.
Victimology can be defined as the claim that a person or a group of people undergo problems, due to victimization. This could be any sort of crime or discrimination against race, sex, gender and even income. Since social media is a transparent source of voicing everybody’s opinion, victimology has become stronger over the past years. Everyone claims to be a victim of some element of society. For example, racial victimology has spiked up ever since the shooting incident of Fergusson, Missouri. Social media has exaggerated the extent of racism involved in this incident. There have been so many opinions and thoughts shared about this story, that it is impossible to access the real incident underneath all these layers. People have been sharing posts and articles about similar racial discrimination ever since, where white
From the origins of criminal victimization, we begin with blaming the offended. (Silverii). Still what is more baffling is to question whether or not it is one's duty to make sure victims won't be victimized again or if victims of a crime that are unreported should even be considered victims. There are three main issues that are provided through victimology and these are context, connections, and investigative direction (Turvey). Most victims are not just victims they're perceived by a criminal as an ideal victim. An ‘ideal victim’ is someone who has played no part in their victimization by an offender who was solely responsible for the incident. In the early 1970s, research by the National Opinion Research Center and the President's Commission on Law Enforcement, and the Administration of Justice indicated that many crimes were not reported to police. A lot of times victims are not prepared for the insensitive and unpleasant treatment they may incur from the police, hospitals, and judicial system. In response, the U.S. Census Bureau began conducting the annual National Crime Victimization Survey in 1973. The survey provides the largest national forum for victims to describe the impact of crime and characteristics of violent offenders. The data includes type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime; relationship between victim and offender; characteristics of the offender; self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions; consequences of the victimization; type of property lost; whether the crime was reported to the police and reasons for reporting or not reporting; and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol.
This tendency to attribute others' misfortunes to their intrinsic failures relates to the widespread social problem that is victim blaming. Observers will "blame" the victims of such diverse wrongful acts as poverty or mental illness, etc. by attributing these ills to intrinsic qualities (laziness, unwholesomeness, etc.) rather than taking into account the many potential extrinsic causes: institutionalized cyclical poverty, lack of mental health care, etc.
Victim precipitation theories generally involve an explanation of how an individual’s behavior may contribute to his or her own victimization. In future the victim precipitation is behavior by a victim that initiates subsequent behavior of the victimizer and the degree to which victim is responsible for own victimization
Comparatively, victim provocation is similar to victim precipitation, except in victim provocation the victim was the one who most likely encouraged, goaded, challenged, or incited an attack which caused their wounds or death (Karmen, 2016). Consequently, victim precipitation and provocation are associated with crimes such as murder, robbery, assault, and rape (Karmen, 2016). Subsequently, in a collaborative study to differentiate victim precipitation and victim provocation, victimologists and criminologists conceded the victims that precipitate crimes are less blameworthy than those who provoke crimes (Karmen, 2016). In my own effort to distinguish the difference between victim precipitation and victim provocation, I developed scenarios for each
Victim-blaming mentality start, instances of sexual harassment have nothing to do with how one looks or dresses. Girls fully covered in school uniform, for instance, have been harassed. It’s sad that once a person becomes a victim in these situations, she is suddenly made to think about her looks or choice of clothes and as an effect chooses to fully cover up her body as preventive measure against the harasser who thinks that a show of skin is an open invite. It’s even more sobering to think that these men are aware that what they’re doing or have done is wrong, and is an act of harassment.”
I think that there is a difference between the term victim precipitation and victim blaming but it is easy to blur those lines. Victim precipitation is not necessarily blaming the victim for the crime they were a victim of but merely looking at how their actions influenced or provided the opportunity for the crime. In some crimes such as homicide this may be possibly used as a mitigation circumstance for the offender. For example: if someone is a victim of homicide because they attacked another and then were killed while the second party was defending themselves this would be a mitigating circumstance for the offender. Victim blaming simply places fault on the victim for what happened and comes across much more negatively.
Having never been to a party, she did not know whether to wear something comfortable, tight, or just normal clothes she would wear to school. After examining Sarah’s closet, her friend decided she needed to wear a dress that fit just right in all the right places. When Sarah arrived to the party, she received multiple compliments from both girls and boys over her outfit. Receiving these compliments made sarah feel as if her outfit was normal for a party, but when she went to the police to report her rape, the first question they asked was, “what were you wearing?” Sarah proceeded to tell him, “a tight red dress with black simple heels and some jewelry.” After telling him this he instantly replied, “Are you sure that is appropriate to wear out in public?” At this moment, Sarah instantly started to doubt herself. “Is it my fault? Should I have even come to the police? Maybe I knew deep down I was asking for it.” These are all thoughts that go through the minds of people having just been raped. In many cases, these thoughts are why most rapes do not get reported. Why do women think something is their fault because they are wearing tight or revealing clothes. The rapist should have the self control to contain themselves. If he does not, he should know the body he is staring at is not just an object. There is a person inside the body; a person with feelings and rights. These unalienable rights cannot be taken away simply because of the clothing she wears and a man 's want for something that is not his to take. People have the freedom to express themselves, one way to do this is by the clothes that they wear. If someone wears a long skirt, to the public eye they are seen as prude. When they wear a short skirt, they are seen as a slut. How does the length of the dress someone wears determine who they are as a person? Wearing a short or tight skirt simply means that a
A writer from Southernct stated a fact that “ men, women, and children of all ages, races, religions, and economic classes have been victims of sexual assault. Sexual assault occurs in rural areas, small towns, and larger cities” ( “Southernct” 1). We have all seen on the news a case where a female has been raped and somehow the world makes us believe that it was her own fault that it happened. This is due to victim blaming. Victim blaming occurs when the victim of some sort of crime or wrongdoing is held partially or fully responsible for what happened to them. It is not always easy to identify though. Some people would be considered to be victim blaming over every day situations in life. For example, someone making the