Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the occupation of a pastor
Essay about characteristics of effective leaders
Essay about characteristics of effective leaders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the occupation of a pastor
“Character doesn’t matter” used by a presidential campaign was a way to cover up the lack of character of the candidate; therefore, using this slogan was a way to convince voters that the lack of character was irrelevant. Does character matter? The real question is not why character is important, but why it doesn’t get the attention and regard it deserves (Crossan, Gandz, and Seijts 3). That could be a matter of opinion; but to a large part of society character does matter, especially when it comes to a person that will be in the public eye or will have an influence in someone’s life. Therefore, character does matter; whether it is a president, a caregiver, a spiritual leader, a teacher, government officials, coaches, or in any leadership …show more content…
Many can argue that character doesn’t matter especially when it comes to someone who will hold a public office. Many will excuse character flaws, as long as this person has leadership and brings some form of financial advantages. As long as they function well in their professional life, their personal life doesn’t seem to matter. Gene Klann mentions that “In the consuming drive to climb the corporate ladder, leaders often compromise character to reach performance goals, forgetting that enduring, positive influence depends on the type of people they are, not merely on power, titles, and personal wealth” (Klann). But there are many instances that character does matter, especially if this person will affect someone’s life. A clear example is a church leader, where character is of true importance. If his character is flawed, could he be trusted? A leaders moral effectiveness relates to his or her conception of right and wrong and the need to live by those beliefs (Klann). The character of a spiritual leader is the foundation of his preaching because how he lives his life is the platform for his proclamation. Pastors are called to live what they preach; therefore, their character must back up what they
John Maxwell once said, “People buy into the leader before they buy into the vision.” A leader must have a solid foundation as a human being before he can try to pursue the public about his visions. He will be examined from every angle about his leadership traits, style, characteristic, and so forth. All of these areas of leadership comes together in what we know as integrity. Integrity is doing what is right morally; it requires honesty, making the “right” decisions for the community, taking the blame, and being selfless. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Machiavelli’s The Prince, there are various examples as to what is the difference between a good and a bad leader, including initiative, accountability, generosity, and the leader’s values.
These leaders focus on personal qualities, personal beliefs, and social characteristics. For example, a leader’s personality and social attributes might have a positive or negative effect on the public sector. Many problems ally with the trait theory in regards the courses of effective behavior that depend upon the situations. In the case of Kim Davis denying the right for a same-sex to obtain a marriage license, the trait theory is very much alive in this situation. Due to Ms. Davis’s personality and physical beliefs she refuses to obey her job as being an elected leader in the public sector. Kim Davis’s beliefs offer a small amount of insight into what she does as a leader.
in leadership can be traced to his character which is shaped by his moral values and
Harlow, Cassie B., Mark Jordan, and William H. Hendrix. Character Assessment: An Examination of Leadership Levels. 4. 17. Human Sciences Press, Inc., 2003.
...t the church will stop shuffling her hurting and broken members to the “experts” who lack the power and perspective of the Word of God, that pastors will instead seize the opportunities to teach, rebuke, correct, and train in righteousness a people fit for service to King Jesus” (27). Unfortunately, in the twenty years since the book was published the church has a long way to go before realizing Dr. Gantz’s hope.
Character is often the setting stone on what a person is judged upon. For someone to have character, they must noticeably stand out, and do extraordinary tasks that a normal student would not usually do. From school activities to sports clubs, I myself carry unique characteristics that set me apart from other students.
Our lesson starts off with this statement that say’s if we know something about the Pastor delivering our Sunday sermon; we will enjoy the sermon that much more.
While it would be logical for good character to be in accordance with good leadership ability, this is rarely true in application. History has proven that many effective leaders were cruel and corrupt, and even American literature has reflected the commonplace nature of corrupted politicians. Upright politicians have existed but do not stay in the brief spotlight of American attention as the ones consumed by scandal. Therefore, Americans labor under the misconception that it is acceptable for a politician to be dishonest. Politicians will ignore moral guidelines to suit the lackadaisical characters of the voters as well as for their own personal gain. Only when Americans decide that personal character is more important than charisma will quality of leadership be supplemented by the moral awareness that the job demands, but which ironically the voters often complain that American leaders do not have.
Bryant and Brunson have done a terrific job of assessing the pastoral ministry and giving sound advice, to the young or prospective pastor. The present author believes that this book should be standard in every pastor’s library. “God promises to be with his servants as they follow” (Bryant and Brunson 2007, 16) The apostle Paul gave three rules to keep the pastor on the track of a good reward: “Fight the Good Fight; Finish the Race; and Keep the Faith.” (Bryant and Brunson 2007, 240-242) The greatest joy for a pastor is to, “Finish well.”
According to Holian & Prysby, voters base characteristics off four personality traits as most relevant for presidential candidates. These include leadership, competence, integrity, and empathy (2012). Obama strengths were integrity and empathy. Taking the time to personalize messages to people and groups showed that Obama had every person’s best interest at heart showing empathy. While, Romney strength was leadership, like many Republicans. However, Obama matched Romney in the leadership characteristic, which is hard for a Democrat to do. Romney’s weaknesses were honesty and empathy. Romney saw everyone as a whole and told the people what he thought the people wanted to hear. Obama won over Romney in characteristics because as a strategy, he made Romney’s character appear negative. This gave Obama a positive look in the eyes of the country and settled the score in the area of
The preacher, according to McDill, must be a Godly example to his audience, the preacher cannot live two different lives. The man he
As I delved into what it meant to be a moral exemplar I found myself asking what qualities a moral person had. The qualities I decided that make people more or less moral than next included: a person’s decisiveness, how genuine a person is, and a person’s honesty. As I probed through
In my view most important character of a good leader is that they must be compassionate. Having a personality of caring about people is important. You can?t be a good leader unless you generally like people. That is how you bring out the best in them. No matter what credential they have and how much experience they have in administration but without being compassionate they can't ever become a responsible and successful leader. For example Hitler is known for his cruelty and he had no feelings for his own race. He failed to understand the feelings of Jews and thus persecuted them. He also failed to know the fact that the strength of his country lies in them, while opposite is Mahatma Gandhi, a major political and spiritual leader of India, followed nonviolent actions, avoiding any bloodshed in the country during their struggle for Independence. Because of his compassionate nature many leaders in today's world has looked him upon. So leader must be compassionate first without being influence by any ulterior motive.
To reflect back on my original question; although the degree of charisma may continue to be on the radar for the selection and evaluation of leaders, in many ways this trait can add to the effectiveness of leaders and I believe will continue to a valued trait.
A pastor has a great responsibility to minister the Word of God and to be a shepherd to his people. The pastor must be committed to biblical truths when he engages the work of the ministry. Some of these truths include: The Bible is the infallible Word of God, his preaching must be from the Word of God, and he must do proper exegesis to get to the authorial intent and proclaim that to his congregation.