Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on primary sources
What are the differences between primary and secondary sources of data
Essay on primary sources
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on primary sources
1. What is the name of the document? Ida Tarbell Criticizes Standard Oil (1904) 2. What type of document is it? (newspaper, map, image, report, Congressional record, etc.) It is a magazine article in McClure’s Magazine, and an excerpt from the book, The History of the Standard Oil Company. 3. Is it a primary or secondary source? It is a primary source. 4. When was the document created? The document was created in 1903 in the magazine and 1904 in the book. 5. Who created the document? Ida Tarbell, a journalist, created this document. 6. What do you know about the creator of the document? Ida Tarbell was one of the “muckrakers” of the progressive era. She was a muckraker, referring to progressive journalists. She participated in investigative …show more content…
Rockefeller was the co-founder of the stand Oil Company. His wealth grew and became the world’s richest man. By the early 1880s, he dominated the oil business with his Standard Oil Company, in which he accounted thirty percent of. In the overall U.S. refineries and pipelines, his company accounted for around ninety percent. John D. Rockefeller was also a major philanthropist. By the end of his life, he had donated around five hundred million dollars to charitable causes. 7. Did the creator have any bias? Yes, this document is mostly one-sided from his point-of-view on the issue of the Standard Oil Company. He tries to back up his success of the Standard Oil Company by talking about the excellence and overall inexpensive of its products. He kept citing how the Standard Oil Company was actually an example and always has been the least hazardous. He writes how to a large degree the oil industry is a gamble for investors and companies. 8. Is the creator a reliable source of information? Yes, if a reader needed a source in John D. Rockefeller’s point-of view. However, I would say no if a reader needed a non-biased document of information because this excerpt was written by Rockefeller and has a lot of bias. There are little to none actual facts, as opposed to Tarbell’s document which showed actual facts about the oil …show more content…
What is the name of the document? The name of the document is Magazine Defense Rockefeller (September 1906). 2. What type of document is it? (newspaper, map, image, report, Congressional record, etc.) This document is a newspaper article from World’s Work. 3. Is it a primary or secondary source? It is a primary source. 4. When was the document created? This document was created on November 10, 1906. 5. Who created the document? The document was created by a journalist. 6. What do you know about the creator of the document? I do not know anything about the creator of the document, except that he or she lived in the time period of the issue of the oil industry, and was old enough to write a newspaper article. 7. Did the creator have any bias? I do not know the creator’s background, so it is very hard to tell if he or she has any bias. However, I do know the writer defends Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Company. 8. Is the creator a reliable source of information? No, the creator does not use facts to back his or her statements against critics. He or she states his or her point-of-view and uses logic, such as how Rockefeller is not a criminal because he used the same tactics as his opponents, and therefore if he was a criminal, Rockefeller would be surrounded by criminals, to prove Rockefeller’s
Being a conscientious journalist, Ida Tarbell is known for the inauguration of muckraking. President Theodore Roosevelt had given the term ‘muckraking’ to this type of investigative journalism done by Ida Tarbell. Roosevelt did not fully support her work because of its "focus and tone." The President got this name from a c...
It's said that before John D. Rockefeller died, "he gave away about $550,000,000 to charity, more than any other American before him had ever possessed" (98). His money went to schools, churches and also "paid teams of scientists who found cures for yellow fever, meningitis, and hookworm"(97).
Secondary sources of literature are primarily written by journalists and does not report an original finding, but rather relies on an original source to provide information that can be used as background material. To use it correctly, one must first distinguish it from primary sources and understand that secondary sources alone cannot sufficiently and
Fifth Edition Vol 2, New York: Longman, 1999. Hidey, Ralph W. and Muriel E. "History of Standard Oil Company (New Jersey), Vol. 1" Pioneering in Big Business" " Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History" eds.
Ida B. Wells-Barnett dedicated her life to social justice and equality. She devoted her tremendous energies to building the foundations of African-American progress in business, politics, and law. Wells-Barnett was a key participant in the formation of the National Association of Colored Women as well as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). She spoke eloquently in support of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association. The legacies of these organizations have been tremendous and her contribution to each was timely and indespensible. But no cause challenged the courage and integrity of Ida B. Wells-Barnett as much as her battle against mob violence and the terror of lynching at the end of the 19th century.
Prior to the year of 1999, Exxon and Mobil were the two largest American oil companies, which were direct descendants of the John D. Rockefeller’s broken up Standard Oil Company. In 1998 Exxon and Mobil signed an eighty billion dollar merger agreement in hope to form Exxon Mobil Corporation, the largest company ever created. Such a merger seems astonishing, not only because it reunited parts of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, but also because it would be extremely difficult for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to approve this merger due to its size and importance in the oil market. In fact, it took the FTC an entire year after the merger was proposed to make a decision due to its rigorous analysis in the product and its geographic market, the concentration of the oil market, the potential anticompetitive effects of the merger, the effects towards their growth and labor force, and lastly, the likelihood of entry and the efficiencies that may affect anticompetitive concerns. Although all of these notions are played a role in the analysis of the merger, it is important to remember that the merger’s result efficiencies did outweigh the the anticompetitive risks that were involved, especially since the oil market was headed towards decreasing prices to expand production.
Some, like Roosevelt viewed methods of muckrakers such as Ida Tarbell, Ray S. Baker, Lincoln Steffens, and Upton Sinclair as these types of people. Others saw these muckraking methods as perfectly acceptable for fighting against the industrial powerhouses. Either way, these muckrakers worked hard to arouse sentiment in the hearts of the public (Reiger 1).
To describe John D. Rockefeller in one word would be an extremely difficult, if not impossible thing to do. Rockefeller was known by so many things in his time and still today; a captain of industry who revolutionised the American economy with new business practices and keen management of what he controlled, a robber baron who lied and cheated his way to the top with back room dealings and taking advantage of the most disadvantaged of people. In his early life, Rockefeller grew up in Richmond, New York with his two brothers and two sisters about 20 years before the start of the Civil War as the child of Eliza Davison and William Avery Rockefeller. His father was con artist who spent most of John’s life traveling selling his various elixirs and his mother was a devout Baptist who John said shaped his life and most of his religious views for the rest of his life. Towards the end of his life, Rockefeller had built up a beyond substantial fortune but, seeing as how he was now retired from the oil industry and had no desire to invest into a new business, he decided to follow Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth by donating the bulk of his wealth to charity. John D. Rockefeller was truly a man who was almost undefinable despite the simple black and white labels that most people and historians have pinned upon him, as we examine his life it can be determined that Rockefeller was neither an evil man nor a good one but someone who lived his life in the grey.
Shabecoff, Philip. “U.S. Asks Exxon for $20 Million to Access Spill Damage in Alaska.”New York Times [New York] 18 January 1990: B4.
In its most basic form, the document is a tantrum of a long disgruntled employee. In this sense we would assume the document would be for the tyrant they oppose, but examination into how the document is written proves otherwise. Throughout the text, King George is consistently
...ichest men in the world, monopolizing the oil industry, which played an important role in shaping the economy. In today’s oil business Rockefeller’s effect can still be seem in business strategies, values, and competitive logic. The oil business is now structured and very competitive. It also plays many important roles in the economy.
Rockefeller was America’s first billionaire, and he was the true epitome of capitalism. Rockefeller was your typical rags-to-riches businessman, and at the turn of the twentieth century, while everyone else in the working class was earning ten dollars max every week, Rockefeller was earning millions. There has been much discussion as to whether Rockefeller’s success was due to being a “robber baron”, or as a “captain of industry”. By definition, a robber baron was an industrialist who exploited others in order to achieve personal wealth, however, Rockefeller’s effect on the economy and the lives of American citizens has been one of much impact, and deserves recognition. He introduced un-seen techniques that greatly modified the oil industry. During the mid-nineteenth century, there was a high demand for kerosene. In the refining process from transforming crude oil to kerosene, many wastes were produced. While others deemed the waste useless, Rockefeller turned it into income by selling them. He turned those wastes into objects that would be useful elsewhere, and in return, he amassed a large amount of wealth. He sold so much “waste” that railroad companies were desperate to be a part of his company. However, Rockefeller demanded rebates, or discounted rates, from the railroad companies, when they asked to be involved with his business. By doing so, Rockefeller was able to lower the price of oil to his customers, and pay low wages to his workers. Using these methods,
Barnett, Ida B., and Ida B. Barnett. Southern horrors and other writings: the anti-lynching campaign of Ida B. Wells, 1892-1900. Boston, MA: Bedford Books, 1997.
The first positive affect of John D. Rockefeller was his donations of large sums of money to public institutions. During his lifetime, Rockefeller gave away 540 million dollars (Sicilia 2006). Almost all of his philanthropies occurred after his retirement from Standard Oil. Donations varied from colleges, to churches, to hospitals. With the help of his son and Frederick Gates, the man Rockefeller put in charge of his philanthropies, he was able to help improve the lives of many (Poole 2000).
If I was the CEO of Wateroil and my company just had the largest oil spill in history, I would tell the investigators right away that it was not an accident. I would feel terrible that it is affecting a lot of people’s lives and businesses. The faster the truth is told about what happened, the faster the issue can be resolved even though there will be consequences. I don’t think I could live with the guilt of knowing how many lives were affected but I didn’t tell the truth just to save my job and company. Corporate greed and corruption is exactly what is taking place in this situation. Corporate greed and corruption is the act of intentionally deceiving, lying, cheating, and stealing in business.