Document Design And Social Justice Summary

502 Words2 Pages

Many texts often exclude and marginalize readers from its content. Writers produce their writings without thinking about the accessibility of their work and what type of readers they might not be reaching due to the lack of a not carefully considered document design. Natasha N. Jones and Stephanie K. Wheeler turn to Universal Design for Documents (UDD) as the best solution to this problem on their article “Document Design and Social Justice”, because it implies the writer has established values and considered inclusiveness when designing their work. Their suggestion also aims to not prioritize one audience over another, evening out their discourse community.
Jones and Wheeler know how to write to their audience, which are mainly writers. Their purpose was to present a different framework of document design, UDD, as the better alternative to the accessibility and usability frameworks. They do so by carefully analyzing each method and pointing out their benefits and handicaps before praising the method they suggest. Their …show more content…

Jones and Wheeler mention that this framework promotes “collective access…and participatory design” (663), but its most valuable characteristic is how it allows the writer to assume a common and universal background knowledge between readers and adapt their work to that vision. To a Philosophy writer using UDD, for example, a reader with a PhD in Philosophy and a reader with a minimum knowledge of Philosophy are in the same discourse community. Her work will be designed to attend to the necessities of that discourse community, which means assuming the reader with a superior knowledge of the subject and the reader with no knowledge of it require the same things to be able to understand and engage with what she writes. When writing, thinking of the reader with the least amount of knowledge of a subject possible allows the writer to reach a broader scope of

Open Document