Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The pros and cons of doctors without borders
Doctors without borders analysis
Doctors without borders analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The pros and cons of doctors without borders
Renee C.Fox’s novel Doctors Without Borders: Humanitarian Quests, Impossible Dreams of Medecins Sans Frontieres is a sociological exploration of the French medical humanitarian organization Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). MSF provides international assistance to those affected by war, disease, and natural disaster while adhering to their core principles of neutrality, impartiality, and independence. Fox begins by showcasing MSF staff blogs that give insight to the reader into why people join MSF, their experiences, and their emotions while serving in a foreign country. She then discusses the moral and medical dilemma that arises when humanitarian action conflicts with political and military power. Fox gives us in depth reports of past field …show more content…
However, their terminology separating the two types of workers contradicts the borderless, egalitarian principles of MSF. The staff indigenous to the countries where MSF field missions are located are called “nationals,” while the others coming into the country are known as “expatriates.” An expatriate is someone who settles oneself abroad, which unfortunately makes it sound as though the European international workers coming into these impoverished countries are akin to problematic colonialists from the past. This idea is expressed by a self-aware MSF expatriate who says that the expatriate-national paradigm is a “form of discrimination that is ‘racist,’ ‘colonialist,’ and ‘neocolonialist” (Fox 106). One senior MSF member points out that the term “expat” sounds very similar to “expert,” which has caused some discomfort among the staff. People have expressed their concern about the hierarchical terminology in the past; however, no rectifications have been made by …show more content…
At the time, two-thirds of MSF’s field work was located in Africa; however, majority of their headquarters were located in Europe. Thus, a non-Western presence was needed to improve MSF’s international work and diversity. After years of colonial oppression, many African countries were beginning to gain independence and and a sense of identity. Thus, there was greater difficulty for Western organizations to keep the once weak African countries complacent. In “‘Nationals’ and ‘expatriates’: Challenges of fulfilling ‘sans frontières’ ideals in international humanitarian action,” Fox and Shevchenko reason,“Instead of lamenting the good old days when governments were weak and aid agencies could do whatever they wanted, MSF has to work to open itself up to establishing networks or building necessary links….” South Africa was the “necessary link” needed to evolve MSF into a real international movement, rather than a Western association claiming to be one. In November 2009, MSF South Africa became recognized as a delegate office, and finally in 2011 at the International General Assembly in Paris, it was formally declared an MSF association. MSF South Africa’s main goal, explained by member Ekambaram, is to appoint members to board based on merit, field experience, and character, rather than their status as national or international. By doing this, they can help bridge the gap between
Her memoir starts off in Darfur in 2005, where in her late 20’s, she hits rock bottom while managing a refugee camp for 24,000 civilians. It backtracks to her internship in Rwanda, while moving forward to her challenges in Darfur, in addition to her experiences in post- tsunami Indonesia, and post-quake in Haiti. By sharing her story, Alexander gives readers an opportunity to go behind-the-scenes into the devastations that are censored on media outlets. She stresses that these are often the problems that individuals claim they are educated on, but rarely make it their priority to solve. However, that is not the case for Jessica Alexander as she has over 12 years of experience working with different NGO’s and UN operations. As a result, Alexander earns the credibility to critique the multi-billion-dollar humanitarian aid industry. From her painful yet rewarding work experience, Alexander gives an honest and empathetic view of humanitarian aid as an establishment and a
During the author’s life in New York and Oberlin College, he understood that people who have not experienced being in a war do not understand what the chaos of a war does to a human being. And once the western media started sensationalizing the violence in Sierra Leone without any human context, people started relating Sierra Leone to civil war, madness and amputations only as that was all that was spoken about. So he wrote this book out o...
An Imperfect Offering is a powerful personal memoir from a James Orbinski, a Canadian who has spent most of his adult life in front-line humanitarian work in the world's worst conflict zones. Despite its dark chapters, it is also a hopeful story about the emergence of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) as a new and independent agent of civil society, and the possibilities of making the world a better place. In “An Imperfect Offering”, James Orbinski tells the story of people who have been harmed by war, and humanitarian workers who have come to heal them when possible. He engages in deep reflection on the nature of humanitarian response and the many threats to this most human activity. He has sharp criticism for governments who act to cause suffering or to prevent its relief. He asks, “How am I able to be in relation to the suffering of others?” His life as a doctor, and a humanitarian worker illustrates this answer. Accordingly, the books main thesis is that humanitarianism is about the struggle to create space to be fully human. However, he illustrates how this struggle is becoming increasingly difficult with the imperfect offering of politics, which has resulted in the blurring of boundaries between humanitarian assistance and the political objectives of military intervention.
...be seen as an entity that promotes vile results. However, it is imperative to understand that globalization is multilayered and difficult to fully understand. In the case of child soldiers, globalization has played a pertinent role in unifying international organizations in hopes of finding a solution to this “phenomenon”. On the other hand, although certain international organizations such as United Nations have had a prominent role in advocating against child soldiery, for the following reasons, its attempts are insufficient: it lacks the ability to enforce sanctions established within the international community and it does not do enough to recognize the political, social and economic inequalities that are prevalent in most of these fragile states. Therefore, child soldiery, cannot be eradicated until these issues are dealt with on a collective global scale.
Dr. Farmer in his article address the subject of structural violence and suffering by utilizing personal narratives. Dr. Farmer travels Haiti, a place deemed by experts to be undergoing “extreme human suffering” (Farmer 262) and recants the narratives of two Haitians, Acephie Joseph and Chouchou Louis, who both suffer premature deaths due to the Haitian Army. Acephie contracts HIV from a Haitian Army Captain and Chouchou is beaten to death by soldiers. At the hands of the Army, Acephie deals with structural violence against women, while Chouchou deals with structural violence against political expression. Although, Acephie and Chouchou are victims of two different forms of structural violence, Dr. Farmer observes one commonality that unites
"You're an expatriate. You've lost touch with the soil. You get precious. Fake European standards have ruined you. You drink yourself to death. You become obsessed with sex. You spend all your time talking, not working. You are an expatriate, see?" (Sun Also Rises, 115)1
Wheeler, Nicholas J. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21,3 (1992)
Osland, Joyce Sautters. "Working abroad: a hero's adventure." Training & Development Nov. 1995: 47+. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Nov. 2013.
Barnett, Michael, and Thomas G. Weiss. Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2008.
Dating back to 1986, Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) was founded by a group of professional doctors who were experts of medicine and health science to do the research and call for public awareness and justice actions to fight against inhumanity and human rights violations (Website—About PHR, 2011; Wikipedia, 2015). The initial purpose of the group was to testify as the representative of doctors and humanitarians in Chile, who were against the military dictator (Wikipedia, 2015). Over the almost 30 years, the survey and expertise of PHR contribute to powerful advocacy in human right activities, which particularly are used to persecute health workers, prevent torture, record the facts of mass atrocities and hold those who were responsible for human rights violations (Website—About PHR, 2011).
Once members in positions of authority recognize and understand this, then they will be able to accomplish resolving humanitarian issues, such as mass killings and genocide. Power’s book claims that the pattern of U.S. failure to assist with humanitarian issues is caused mainly because of the structure of the American political system. Kaufmann also states that out of all the genocides that have occurred since WWII, the Rwandan genocide of 1994 has been the most blatant failing of the U.S. aid. While I agree with Kaufmann’s statement of the United States being able to prevent the deaths of innocent victims had they intervened and taken effective measures to reduce the number of killings, there are several different factors to consider, such as transportation and preparation. I also agree with Power’s claim that the organization of the American political system is a great challenge in assisting to prevent
War is a tragic event, and is often regarded as the symbol of pain, suffering, injuries, and death. Words cannot describe the intensiveness and the pain people go through during these devastating times. War is about the experiences people have on the battlefield, as well the suffering of innocent civilians. It damages the lives of many individuals both physically and mentally. Unfortunately, the people directly partaking in military actions are not the only ones who suffer; their families often go through just as much emotional pain on the bloody journey to peace.
Humanitarian Intervention Hypothesis: That despite the incidents where humanitarian interventions have proved seemingly unsuccessful, they are, nonetheless, a vital tool in alleviating the human suffering that so plagues contemporary society. The post-Cold war world is one that has been riddled with conflict, suffering and war. In the face of such times, the issue of humanitarian intervention and about who, when and how it should be employed, has become hotly debated. While some critics declare this kind of intervention to be a violation of national sovereignty, others believe that relief efforts aimed at ending human suffering are perfectly justifiable. 7.
First of all, we must study the history of the organization that we are going to talk about in this assignment, Médecins sans frontières, abbreviated to MSF or Doctors without borders, is an international non-governmental organization with a humanitarian purpose of French origin but whose International headquarters is based in Geneva (Switzerland). It provides emergency medical assistance in cases such as armed conflict, natural disasters, epidemics and famines. MSF also offers longer-term actions in protracted conflict or chronic instability, refugee relief and post-disaster situations. The Organization awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1999. Doctors without borders was founded on 20 December 1971 in France and was the first non-governmental
He discusses the way the precise meaning of impartiality has evolved in recent years, in a world where in the same emergency, a Red Cross nurse can use the term to describe her medical program and a UN commander can use the same word to describe air strikes (Slim, 2010, p344). There is impartiality where it means you uphold accepted human values irrespective of the allegiance of the person involved. It has been reasserted by NGOs to be the guiding ethic of operations in war contexts. For the ICRC, impartiality was grounded in a commitment to non-discrimination that would facilitate proximity to suffering populations and an immediate response to need. The humanitarian idea of impartiality as a basis for delineating a space for ethical action apart from the political realm was influenced by the view, expressed by Pictet, that political struggle is invariably futile (Leebaw, 2007, p.227).