Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender variation of language
Gender variation of language
Gender variation of language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender variation of language
Discussion of Significant Differences Between Men's and Women's Talking Manners
Beginning with the role of compliments in female-male interaction by
Janet Holmes in Reading B of Chapter 1 of your textbook Using English:
from conversation to canon, discuss the significant differences
between men’s and women’s talk – the way they interact, their choice
of words and phrases and the topics they like to discuss.
The linguist Halliday (1978) suggests that language has a dual
function; it communicates ideational meaning, in terms of the
information and ideas expressed, and it also communicates
interpersonal meaning, expressing the degree of friendliness, or
status difference between speakers. Since women and men occupy
different subcultures, and subcultures are also differentiated
according to how language is used, it is reasonable to say that the
genders would exhibit distinctive language patterns. ( Maybin, Mercer,
p5 )
Beginning with the work of Lakoff (1975), which documented that women
and men communicate on the basis of languages which are differentiated
according to gender. She suggests that women use more tag questions
(eg. Isn’t it? Don’t you think? ) more indirect polite forms (eg.
Could you please? ) more intensifiers (eg. Really ) and what she sees
as generally weaker vocabulary ( eg. Words like lovely and Oh dear ).
Linguists use the term female register to indicate a particular set
of grammatical constructions that are used primarily by women. (
Crosby and Nyquist, 1977).
Usage of Qualifiers
First, women use more qualifiers than men. These words hedge or
soften statements that are mostly evaluative in na...
... middle of paper ...
... conversation’,
Language, vol. 50, no. 4 pp 696-735
34. Tannen, D. (1984) Conversational Style: analyzing talk among
friends, Norwood, N.J., Ablex.
35.Tannen, D. (1989) Talking voices: repetition, dialogue and imagery
in conversational discourse, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
36. Wolfson, N. (1982) CHP: the conversational historical present in
American English narrative, Cinnaminson, USA. Foris.
Robin Lakoff (1975) also suggests that women use more tag questions
like ( isn’t it? Don’t you think?) more indirect polite forms (eg.
Could you possibly? ) more intensifiers (eg. Really) ; and weaker
vocabulary (eg. Words like lovely and Oh dear ) She also observed that
men tend to dominate the topics and the management of mixed gender
conversation, interrupting more and giving less feedback and support.
In her article “But What Do You Mean” Deborah Tannen, claims that there is a huge difference in the style of communicating between men and women. Tannen breaks these down into seven different categories; apologies, criticism, thank-yous, fighting, praise, complaints, and jokes. With each of these she compares men to women by explaining the common misconceptions that each of the genders do. The different style of communication can cause some problems at the workplace and even affect the environment. The different styles of communication has been around forever and almost becomes a “ritual”(299). Tannen is effective with mainly women and not men. She is primarily successful with women due to the fact that her tone targets women, also the organization
“Men are from Mars, women are from Venus” as the famous saying of John Gray goes. It is believed men and women are nothing alike in almost every aspect. In Deborah Tannen’s essay “Gender in the classroom: Teacher’s Classroom Strategies Should Recognize that Men and Women Use Language Differently” she focused on how men and women differ when it comes to communicating, with emphasis on how it effects to how men and women behave in the classroom.
In the introduction of Deborah Tannen’s “Conversation Style: Talking on the Job”, she compares and contrasts the ways men and women communicate. This reminds me of what I tell people that are struggling in their relationships. Women and men express themselves differently. Women think, but men act. If you can’t wrap your head around this, being in a relationship with anyone is going to be hard. Yet, this is such a basic way of looking at this issue. Not only are the genders vastly different, but each person relates to the world around them in a certain way. He or she also needs to be related to in a specific way. Looking at personalities and personal histories can give a better look at the way we communicate with each other. Tannen examines
In recent years, gender differences have already been one of the most controversial issues in various research. As an important communication tool of mankind, language is inevitably involved in controversies. However, Rachel Rafelman, a Canadian journalist and the author of “The Party Line” express her thought and opinion in her essay. She not only have some great points on what and how women and men are likely to talk, but also have different points on the talking environment. She comes up with facts and fit real and particle examples in her essay to make it understood. Whereas, Ronald Macaulay, a professor of linguistics and the author of “Sex Difference” uses words of novels to argue and promotes them as a cause of reinforce to men’s and women’s stereotypes in his essay. He argues through his whole as rebuttal and gives some examples to oppose the preconceived notion of sex differences. Over all, both Rafelman and Macaulay are the good writer but Rafelman is having upper to prove her essay better organized using her tones as per requirement.
Do men and women effectively communicate in the same way, or is it just a conversation of misunderstanding? There is constantly a new interest in whether men and women converse successfully. Professor and journalist, Deborah Tannen writes, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” Tannen compares and contrasts all conversational styles, and explains how the expectation of dialogue affects how men and women converse. Tannen focuses on the subject of marriage and the imbalance of interest between male and female couples. The contrasting perspective however comes from, Deborah Cameron, author of, “What Language Barrier”. Cameron conveys that the stereotypes left upon male and female communication
A vividly concrete illustration of the change of words connotation depending on their usage is provided by Robin Tolmach Lakoff in his work You Are What You Say. He explained that the construction of sentences conveys different meaning. According to Tolmach Lakoff’s investigation, flat statements sound more confident, direct, and dogmatic. They show that a speaker knows what he says and believes fairly in his words (Lakoff 322). In comparison, a yes-no question will point at lack of the respondent’s knowledge, while a tag question shows that a person knows the subject of conversation but she is not so confident in the truth of the claim.
For instance, “most forms give four titles to choose from. “Mr.” carries no meaning other than that the respondent is male. But a woman who checks “Mrs.”
According to Kramarae groups within our society are muted, or go incompletely heard due to the lack of an effective means to express certain groups of ideas, experiences, or thoughts. Kramarae calls these groups muted and focuses specifically on the muted group of women. She argues that language is "man-made" and "aids in defining, depreciating and excluding women" (Griffin,1997,459). Muted Group Theory sees language as excluding women based on several factors. For example the words used to describe a sexually promiscuous individual are radically different. For men words like, stud, playboy, rake, gigolo, and womanizer among others, all with positive connotations, describe the sexually active male. In a harsh contrast words to describe a female with an active sexual appetite include: slut, hooker, mistress, hussy, easy lay, prostitute, whore, and nymphomaniac. The women-specific words are demoralizing and place a negative value on women’s sexuality. The words used to describe men make them seem powerful, controlling, and dominant. Kramarae’s theory poses questions about why these phenomena exist.
Nevertheless, words spoken can be positive or negative depending on how it is received and by whom. I find that it depends on who is speaking and how their demeanor is can simply emphasize a word. Naylor writes, “The noun girl was its closest equivalent to that sense, but only when used in direct address and regardless of the gender doing the addressing.” The understanding of the word girl being misspoken by someone can go from a positive to a negative outcome.
Lieberman, Simma. “Differences in Male and Female Communication Styles” Simma Lieberman Associates (undated). Retrieved February 25, 2010<
Everyone has a certain type of communication style that we rely on to communicate with others. The style we chose to express ourselves, usually shows a great deal about our personalities. Passive, aggressive, passive-aggressive, and assertive are four types of communication. Out of all these, assertive communication is the most beneficial for everyone, because it gets your point across without taking away other people's voices.
Leech (1974:12) stated that connotative meaning can be subjective or unstable. It depends on how an individual perceives the word. In conceptual meaning, the word woman is defined in three different features (+Human, -Male, +Adult); however, in connotative meaning, there is the additional characteristics, properties, and features that woman has, such as:
Through out my adolescence and now as a young adult, I have always taken an interest in the discussion of gender and women’s studies. I have always questioned the status quo and for the last couple of days I have embarked to be critically observant to the communication that is influenced by gender around me. As I began this class, I had just returned from a month long visit to Colombia where I spent time with family. As both a feminist and the by-product of two differing cultures, it was interesting to find the ways in which the culture my aunts participated in was more “traditional” than I expected. Both the culture at home and the mass media messages in the country were indicative of a dynamic where a woman is expected to be “polite, neat,
“Men are from Mars, women are from Venus.” It’s the thought that crosses everyone’s mind; are men and women the same? In many ways men and women are different. When people think about men and women they do not think similarities even though there are many reasons why they should. The differences between the two are much larger than the similarities but they are still there. Stereotypes have a lot to do with this because the way the world sees females and males affect how they act. Three of the main differences and similarities are within parenting, physical shape, and emotional state.
Wardhaugh states different social norms defining the standards of being men or women, which has a profound influence on the language behavior shown by different genders. In other words, both men and women should possess the ability to show either masculinity or feminity through the language they use. When this ability overlaps with the other gender, however, one might be considered as as outsider of their own gender. He then lists the main differences between males and femals with the connection with language: genetic differences, social differences (e.g. various roles people take within a certain society), and linguistic differences (e.g. speech style and word choice). Doing so, he gives readers an indepth idea about how gender differences link to various language behaviors. He further explains how these differences are possibly created and constructed in society. Wardhaugh also examines a few common gender stereotypes, such as women talk more than men, and proves most of the stereotypes are wrong.