Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief introduction of outsourcing
The significance of outsourcing
Brief introduction of outsourcing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brief introduction of outsourcing
Outsourcing Outsourcing is a term defined as the movement of jobs elsewhere to another company that can perform the same tasks, even though there is the potential of doing the jobs inside the company itself. An example of outsourcing is currently being done at your company, where contractors, usually part of their own contracting company, are performing the duties the old employees used to do. Another example of outsourcing can be moving jobs overseas, such as to developing nations, where cheap labour is readily available and the laws are much less restrictive. In both of these circumstances, the aim of outsourcing is to provide a cheaper alternative for the company, while improving its efficiency. Though there is usually deep public backlash from workers right over Australia, when jobs are being sent overseas. Effects on Individuals and Their Possible Experiences There is a wide-range of experiences an individual will take, due to Outsourcing. Outsourcing has an array of benefits and setbacks, though is often use …show more content…
right across the Developed World. For workers in developing regions of the world and contractors, outsourcing is favourable towards them as it allows them to have a job, that will pay them. Although they won’t receive entitlements that normal employees would, such as annual leave loading, they know that companies will often be regularly scouting for contract-based workers and with this, comes a secure source of income for a period of time, that be used to combat poverty in some regions; feeding families and providing a future of hope. For contractors based in Australia perhaps, this means that they also gain a high level of autonomy from the employer and will be in charge of their own activities. Managers also benefit from this form of employment; whereby their responsibilities are significantly reduced and no longer liable in most workplace incidents. However, the effects are quite disadvantageous for those who are employees; directly working under the supervision of a manager. Outsourcing means that their jobs will be taken over by someone else and that they will lose their job. They will lose their income and any benefits acquired. They will feel as if a sort of injustice has been blown to them; with very little they are able to do. They will no longer be able to look after their families. They will also realise that the company doesn’t value their workers either. This will flow on with public opinion, with the media heavily criticising its decisions – if jobs are sent elsewhere. Though they can also be disadvantageous in a sense that quality if often lost, a company will lose much control over its activities, amongst others. Though the biggest threat posed by outsourcing is the need to share important data, which is often classified as confidential. Having no central control can severely limit a companies’ capability to control the flow of this information; as it may fall into untrustworthy hands. Laws and Legislation Although there is no particular law in relation to outsourcing or anti-outsourcing in New South Wales or right across Australia alone, there are still many legal issues that arise from the growth of outsourcing. Along with the issues, also comes the consequences, risks to companies and the subsequent impact on the local economy. Though this is mainly offshore, and contracting laws constitute a completely different set of legislation. For these type of workers, the two laws that define an independent contractor and what their rights and privileges are the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cwth) and the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cwth). Both of these laws work together to assist independent contractors right around Australia. The aspects relating contractors and contracting in these laws are administered by the Fair Work Ombudsman. These two laws, work in combination to define the difference between an employee and an independent contractor.
Usually, it is determined directly between the two parties of the worker and the employer; though when an incident occurs, it may be harder to find the truth. Usually, independent contractors enjoy a high level of autonomy when conducting their work and usually, work on hours they’ve assigned themselves, have their own tools etc., and since it is likely they have their own contracting business they will hold a unique ABN or Australian Business Number. This special code is used to identify a business to the government, client, customer, and in our case; an employer. This law also defends independent contractors from receiving and abiding by flawed contracts, which the Fair Work Ombudsman refers to as a ‘sham’. They also provide basic rights to each contractor in the workplace; though it is only partial in comparison to the rights of an
employee. As for responsibilities, independent contractors should always be informed of the law; and know how to properly identify a ‘sham’ contract. They must also know their power in the law. Whilst managers and employers must deal with all employees and contractors truthfully. They should be aware that they cannot offer flawed arrangements, via the contract and they cannot simply turn around and brand their employees as ‘contractors’, in any case, whether it is by threatening them or persuading them. If this is breached and an employee or contract worker feels as if their rights have been violated; they may make a claim with the Fair Work Ombudsman. If the employer is proven guilty, they could be forced to pay up to $54,000 for each offence committed and in some cases will need to pay damages to the employee, while possibly restoring them back to their original position; before their dismissal/incident. As a result of this, even though that many contractors are heavily used in the manufacturing industry; for example, within Juggernaut Industries. We seriously believe you should rethink the idea of contracting all your workers; you still need some employees to retain the central management of your company.
Outsourcing simply means acquiring services from an external organization instead of using internal resources (Butler, 2000). By using outsourced resources, organizations can gain a competitive advantage by utilizing contingent staff to accomplish strategic goals without incurring the fixed overhead. By focusing on the leading edge and highly specialized skill sets, outsourcing providers can often offer higher quality services, or at a lower price than the client organization. Typical reasons for outsourcing go beyond simple contingent staffing. Outsourcing providers are able to maintain economies of scale with regard to specialization (...
It will strictly follow the offshore labour laws. This was why Andrews decided to cut ties with the previous supplier. The risk of being associated with a supplier that violated labour laws would put Andrews under constant threat of legal problems and negative press. This condition would eliminate that risk to a great extent.
With the economy beginning to rebound, many companies are looking for every way possible to save money and/or maximize profits. One of the biggest costs incurred by any business is labor. Consequently, employers sometimes attempt to minimize this expense by utilizing independent contractors instead of employees. There are potential risks for employers who mischaracterize an employee as an independent contractor, because, while it may save payroll taxes and other benefit costs in the short term, it may lead to penalties on such taxes as well as other inadvertent violations of worker’s compensation laws, FMLA, etc, which each hold separate penalties for violation.
Recently outsourcing has been in the news, especially during political election years. It seems to be a phenomenon that is causing much concern among the population. But exactly how is outsourcing effecting both workers and businesses? And is it as big of a problem as politicians describe?
It is difficult to determine whether offshore outsourcing has a positive or negative effect on the U.S. economy. It may actually depend on which perspective you take on it. As stated by Hira and Hira (2005), outsourcing in the services sector is a major shift in how the economy operates and will have serious impacts, both positive and negative, on the trajectory of economic growth, distribution of income and the workforce. However, there are many factors to take into account when considering globalization. Companies must familiarize themselves with the various rules and regulations of global business, tariffs, trade agreements and barriers, and decide how to go global; global consistency or local adaptation. All of these issues affect a company’s plan to move forward with offshore outsourcing.
In many cases outsourcing has proven to be beneficial for businesses. It can help a business’s management by allowing executives to focus on the core structure of the firm rather than every specific element. Production, manufacturing, or additional servic...
The proponents of contracting out assume that outsourcing in the IT sector is useful in strategic, technological, and economic reasons. (Gonzalez, Gasco & Llopis, 2009) They believe that outsourcing enables an organization to get the same or better services with lower cost. First, strategic advantages enable organizations to refocus on strategic and core functions, and provide flexibility for organizations because organizations need not to concern about routine tasks (Gonzalez, Gasco & Llopis, 2009). OPPGA (1998) also support these strategic advantages. It asserts that outsourcing can provide organizations with great flexibility in personnel and facilities in short-term projects. Outsourcing providers can provide better services for clients since they usually use new and developed technologies. Second, proponents think that outsourcing gives organizations opportunities to access to technology and reduce technological obsolescence without large investments (Gonzalez, Gasco & Llopis, 2009). Lastly, Pros assume that contracting out can save s...
Outsourcing is a technique for companies to reassign specific responsibilities to external entities. There are several motivations for outsourcing including organizational, improvement, cost, and revenue advantages (Ghodeswar & Vaidyanathan, 2008).
This report is extremely credible and qualified, as it was written by an author who is well-versed on the topic. The author was also the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, making him even more authentic source. Throughout the article, the author discusses and examines the words of two other authors, Ron and Anil Hira, who are experts on the subject of American Outsourcing. These authors are also very credible; one is a professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology, and the other is a professor at Simon Fraser University. Additionally, the author refers to many case studies that were taken at different universities in order to justify his claims on why American Outsourcing is bad. The intended audience is
Outsourcing is a strategic activity in which some of the internal activities of the organisation are delegated to external firms because of various reasons such as:
Kibbe, C. (2004, 07 09). Outsourcing: the good, the bad and the inevitable. New Hampshire Business Review, pp. 1A-21A.
Outsourcing is shifting all of the costs-accounting costs, including personnel, plus the risk of failure and the responsibility for action-to the third party. In return for assuming costs, the third party benefits by controlling the operation (Coughlan 167). This is the basic definition of what outsourcing is. Outsourcing has been around from the beginning of time. In the movie, ?It Started With the Greeks,? they talk about how the Ionians found out that they could go around the world and find products that people back in their home town would buy. This essentially started the idea of outsourcing since the people who wanted the product was unable to get it but, they were able to have someone else do it for them. Once people knew that they could get anything that they wanted from around the world it lead into consumerism. So once someone got the idea to start and do this full time as a job they were able to outsource anything that they wanted.
The word "outsourcing" were introduced in the mid 80s. However, the hiring idea someone else that to do specific jobs or dividing labour has existed for hundreds of years. In the business era, outsourcing can be found in every place or...
Introduction Being as an employee in a company, there might have no differences between being an independent contractor or an employee in their points of view since they might be preforming the same job and working together at the same company. On the other hand, being as an employer, the employer must identify who and what are the differences between the employees and the independent contractors. Failure to do so might result in significant liability on the employer. The major difference between independent contractor and employee goes beyond the job, the title, and even the performance. The differences are majorly involved with legal issue such as determining one’s liability to pay and withhold Federal income tax, social security tax and
By contrast, the compliance standards applicable to contractor employees are much less comprehensive and can vary significantly from contract to contract. A handful of statutes apply to contractor employees and prohibit their offering bribes or illegal gratuities, serving as foreign agents, disclosing procurement information, and offering or receiving kickbacks. The FAR requires contracting officers to identify organizational conflicts of interest (in which the contractor has a corporate interest that may bias its judgment or the advice it provides to the government) and address or waive such conflicts. The FAR also requires contracting firms that have entered into one or more government contracts, valued in excess of $5 million and requiring 120 days or more, to have in place “codes of business ethics and